Stereotactic mesencephalotomy versus multiple thalamotomies in the treatment of chronic cancer pain syndromes.

F Frank, A P Fabrizi, G Gaist, K Weigel, F Mundinger
{"title":"Stereotactic mesencephalotomy versus multiple thalamotomies in the treatment of chronic cancer pain syndromes.","authors":"F Frank,&nbsp;A P Fabrizi,&nbsp;G Gaist,&nbsp;K Weigel,&nbsp;F Mundinger","doi":"10.1159/000100733","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Two neurosurgical centers, Bologna (Italy) and Freiburg (FRG), have compared results obtained with stereotactic mesencephalotomy (SM; Bologna) and multiple thalamotomies (MT; Freiburg) in the surgical treatment of chronic cancer pain syndromes. In total, 161 patients were operated, 109 in Bologna and 52 in Freiburg. In SM the lesions were single and centered on the spinothalamic tract at the mesencephalic level, while in MT the lesions were multiple in the thalamic nuclei (ventrocaudal parvocellular nucleus, nucleus limitans, lamella medialis, centromedian nuclei). The following results emerged after 2-7 months' follow-up: (1) in an antalgic sense, SM was much more beneficial, with 91 patients (83.5%) pain-free after the operation versus 27 patients (51.9%) who had only an attenuation of the pain syndrome after MT; (2) SM, compared to MT, is burdened by mortality and a higher morbidity [2 deaths (1.8%) vs. 0; 3 anesthesia dolorosa and 8 severe gaze palsies (10.1%) vs. only 1 case of permanent aphasia (1.9%)].</p>","PeriodicalId":75525,"journal":{"name":"Applied neurophysiology","volume":"50 1-6","pages":"314-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1987-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1159/000100733","citationCount":"16","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000100733","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 16

Abstract

Two neurosurgical centers, Bologna (Italy) and Freiburg (FRG), have compared results obtained with stereotactic mesencephalotomy (SM; Bologna) and multiple thalamotomies (MT; Freiburg) in the surgical treatment of chronic cancer pain syndromes. In total, 161 patients were operated, 109 in Bologna and 52 in Freiburg. In SM the lesions were single and centered on the spinothalamic tract at the mesencephalic level, while in MT the lesions were multiple in the thalamic nuclei (ventrocaudal parvocellular nucleus, nucleus limitans, lamella medialis, centromedian nuclei). The following results emerged after 2-7 months' follow-up: (1) in an antalgic sense, SM was much more beneficial, with 91 patients (83.5%) pain-free after the operation versus 27 patients (51.9%) who had only an attenuation of the pain syndrome after MT; (2) SM, compared to MT, is burdened by mortality and a higher morbidity [2 deaths (1.8%) vs. 0; 3 anesthesia dolorosa and 8 severe gaze palsies (10.1%) vs. only 1 case of permanent aphasia (1.9%)].

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
立体定向中脑切开术与多发性丘脑切开术治疗慢性癌性疼痛综合征。
两个神经外科中心,博洛尼亚(意大利)和弗莱堡(FRG),比较了立体定向中脑切开术(SM;Bologna)和多发性丘脑切开术(MT;Freiburg)在慢性癌症疼痛综合征的外科治疗中的应用。总共有161名患者接受了手术,其中109名在博洛尼亚,52名在弗赖堡。在中脑水平,SM的病变是单一的,以脊髓丘脑束为中心,而MT的病变在丘脑核(腹侧旁胞核、限制核、内侧板核、中央核)中是多发的。2-7个月的随访结果显示:(1)在镇痛意义上,SM更有益,91例(83.5%)患者术后无疼痛,27例(51.9%)患者术后疼痛综合征减轻;(2)与MT相比,SM的死亡率和发病率更高[2例死亡(1.8%)比0例;麻醉麻木3例,重度凝视性麻痹8例(10.1%),永久性失语1例(1.9%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Proceedings of the 2nd International Symposium on Dorsal Root Entry Zone (DREZ) Lesions. Durham, N.C., April 24-26, 1987. Abnormal physiology of the dorsal horn as related to the deafferentation syndrome. Neurochemistry of the dorsal horn. Investigation on cerebrospinal fluid opioids and neurotransmitters related to spinal cord stimulation. Historical development of neural transplantation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1