Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model

Tim Kiefer, Martin Knoll, Andreas Fath
{"title":"Comparing Methods for Microplastic Quantification Using the Danube as a Model","authors":"Tim Kiefer, Martin Knoll, Andreas Fath","doi":"10.3390/microplastics2040025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the impact different mesh-sized filtration methods have on the amount of detected microplastics in the surface water of the Danube River delta. Further, the distribution of microplastics in different size categories (20 µm, 65 µm, 105 µm) and in the water column (0 m, 3 m, 6 m) was analyzed. Our findings show that the Danube River carries 46 p∙L−1 (microplastic particles per liter) with a size larger than 105 µm, 95 p∙L−1 larger than 65 µm and 2677 p∙L−1 that are larger than 20 µm. This suggests a negative logarithmic correlation between mesh size and particle amount. The most abundant polymer throughout all samples was polyethylene terephthalate, followed by polytetrafluorethylene. Overall, the data shows that different sampling methods cannot be compared directly. Further research is needed to find correlations in particle sizes for better comparison between different sampling methods.","PeriodicalId":74190,"journal":{"name":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Microplastics and nanoplastics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/microplastics2040025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study investigates the impact different mesh-sized filtration methods have on the amount of detected microplastics in the surface water of the Danube River delta. Further, the distribution of microplastics in different size categories (20 µm, 65 µm, 105 µm) and in the water column (0 m, 3 m, 6 m) was analyzed. Our findings show that the Danube River carries 46 p∙L−1 (microplastic particles per liter) with a size larger than 105 µm, 95 p∙L−1 larger than 65 µm and 2677 p∙L−1 that are larger than 20 µm. This suggests a negative logarithmic correlation between mesh size and particle amount. The most abundant polymer throughout all samples was polyethylene terephthalate, followed by polytetrafluorethylene. Overall, the data shows that different sampling methods cannot be compared directly. Further research is needed to find correlations in particle sizes for better comparison between different sampling methods.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
以多瑙河为模型的微塑性定量方法比较
本研究探讨了不同网目过滤方法对多瑙河三角洲地表水微塑料检测量的影响。此外,还分析了微塑料在不同尺寸类别(20µm, 65µm, 105µm)和水柱(0 m, 3 m, 6 m)中的分布。我们的研究结果表明,多瑙河携带46个p∙L−1(每升塑料微粒),其尺寸大于105µm, 95个p∙L−1大于65µm, 2677个p∙L−1大于20µm。这表明网目尺寸和颗粒量之间呈负对数相关。所有样品中含量最多的聚合物是聚对苯二甲酸乙二醇酯,其次是聚四氟乙烯。总的来说,数据表明不同的抽样方法不能直接进行比较。为了更好地比较不同的采样方法,需要进一步的研究来发现颗粒大小的相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Vertical movement of microplastics by roots of wheat plant (Triticum aestivum) and the plant response in sandy soil Informing the Plastic Treaty negotiations on science - experiences from the Scientists’ Coalition for an Effective Plastic Treaty Impacts of micro- and nanoplastics on early-life health: a roadmap towards risk assessment Use of metal-tagged environmentally representative micro- and nanoplastic particles to investigate transport and retention through porous media using single particle ICP-MS Unravelling protein corona formation on pristine and leached microplastics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1