Deconstructing and Reconstructing Englishness: National Symbolism of the County House in McEwan’s Atonement

IF 0.2 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1080/00111619.2023.2270895
Kui Zeng, Hongbin Dai
{"title":"Deconstructing and Reconstructing Englishness: National Symbolism of the County House in McEwan’s <i>Atonement</i>","authors":"Kui Zeng, Hongbin Dai","doi":"10.1080/00111619.2023.2270895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTThis article extends previous readings of Atonement’s representation of the English country house by examining it in relation to a nostalgic version of Englishness that still appeals to a contemporary audience. It argues that the novel both deconstructs and reconstructs the idea of rural Englishness endorsed by the heritage culture. By disclosing the constructedness of the timeless England, Atonement shows that rural Englishness is crafted out of a fantasy of seamless historical continuity that has never existed. McEwan indicates that the projection of the aristocratic patriarch’s private property as a repository of English values and culture obscures the class and gender oppression embedded in the country-house power structures. The progressive politics of Atonement is further seen in its refiguration of the elitist, exclusive version of Englishness as a more democratic and inclusive form of Britishness. It justifies the vision of multicultural British identity by appealing to the shared past of Heritage England and immigrants from the old empire. This shared past is revealed in the novel through subtle allusions to the hidden connections between English estate houses and Britain’s colonial enterprise. Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. See Mark Girouard, Life in the English Country House: A Social and Architectural History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), p. 292; and Susie L. Steinbach, Understanding the Victorians: Politics, Culture, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Britain (London: Routledge, 2016), p. 22.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China [20BWW041].Notes on contributorsKui ZengKui Zeng is currently a postdoctoral fellow at the College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China. His research interests include British rural novels (with a focus on English country-house novels), Sino-British literary relations, and postcolonial criticism. His work has appeared in international journals such as the Journal of Language, Literature and Culture and Renaissance Studies.Hongbin DaiHongbin Dai is a professor at the College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China. He specializes in the fields of modern English literature and has published three monographs and more than thirty articles in various journals at home and abroad, such as Critique, Scottish Literary Review, Modernism/modernity, Foreign Literature Studies, Religions, and Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature.","PeriodicalId":44131,"journal":{"name":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","volume":"12 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CRITIQUE-STUDIES IN CONTEMPORARY FICTION","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00111619.2023.2270895","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTThis article extends previous readings of Atonement’s representation of the English country house by examining it in relation to a nostalgic version of Englishness that still appeals to a contemporary audience. It argues that the novel both deconstructs and reconstructs the idea of rural Englishness endorsed by the heritage culture. By disclosing the constructedness of the timeless England, Atonement shows that rural Englishness is crafted out of a fantasy of seamless historical continuity that has never existed. McEwan indicates that the projection of the aristocratic patriarch’s private property as a repository of English values and culture obscures the class and gender oppression embedded in the country-house power structures. The progressive politics of Atonement is further seen in its refiguration of the elitist, exclusive version of Englishness as a more democratic and inclusive form of Britishness. It justifies the vision of multicultural British identity by appealing to the shared past of Heritage England and immigrants from the old empire. This shared past is revealed in the novel through subtle allusions to the hidden connections between English estate houses and Britain’s colonial enterprise. Disclosure StatementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. See Mark Girouard, Life in the English Country House: A Social and Architectural History (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1978), p. 292; and Susie L. Steinbach, Understanding the Victorians: Politics, Culture, and Society in Nineteenth-Century Britain (London: Routledge, 2016), p. 22.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the National Social Science Foundation of China [20BWW041].Notes on contributorsKui ZengKui Zeng is currently a postdoctoral fellow at the College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China. His research interests include British rural novels (with a focus on English country-house novels), Sino-British literary relations, and postcolonial criticism. His work has appeared in international journals such as the Journal of Language, Literature and Culture and Renaissance Studies.Hongbin DaiHongbin Dai is a professor at the College of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Xiamen University, China. He specializes in the fields of modern English literature and has published three monographs and more than thirty articles in various journals at home and abroad, such as Critique, Scottish Literary Review, Modernism/modernity, Foreign Literature Studies, Religions, and Interdisciplinary Studies of Literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
解构与重构英国性:麦克尤恩《赎罪》中郡宅的国家象征主义
摘要本文扩展了之前对《赎罪》中英国乡村别墅的解读,将其与一种仍然吸引当代观众的怀旧的英国风格联系起来。文章认为,小说对传统文化所支持的乡村英国性观念进行了解构和重构。通过揭示永恒英格兰的建构性,《赎罪》表明,乡村英格兰是由一种从未存在过的无缝历史连续性的幻想精心打造而成的。麦克尤恩指出,将贵族家长的私有财产投射为英国价值观和文化的宝库,掩盖了嵌入乡村权力结构中的阶级和性别压迫。赎罪的进步政治进一步体现在它将精英主义的、排他性的英国性重新塑造为一种更民主、更包容的英国性形式。它通过诉诸传统英格兰和来自旧帝国的移民的共同过去,为多元文化英国身份的愿景辩护。这种共同的过去在小说中通过微妙的暗示揭示了英国庄园与英国殖民企业之间隐藏的联系。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。参见Mark Girouard,《英国乡村别墅的生活:社会和建筑史》(纽黑文:耶鲁大学出版社,1978),第292页;苏茜·l·斯坦巴赫:《理解维多利亚时代:19世纪英国的政治、文化和社会》(伦敦:劳特利奇出版社,2016),第22页。本研究得到中国国家社会科学基金项目[20BWW041]资助。作者简介曾奎,现任厦门大学外国语言文化学院博士后。他的研究兴趣包括英国乡村小说(重点是英国乡村小说)、中英文学关系和后殖民批评。他的作品曾发表在《语言、文学与文化》和《文艺复兴研究》等国际期刊上。戴宏斌,中国厦门大学外语文化学院教授。主要研究英国现代文学,在《批判》、《苏格兰文学评论》、《现代主义/现代性》、《外国文学研究》、《宗教》、《文学跨学科研究》等国内外刊物上发表专著3部,论文30余篇。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
56
期刊介绍: Since its inception in the 1950s, Critique has consistently identified the most notable novelists of our time. In the pages of Critique appeared the first authoritative discussions of Bellow and Malamud in the ''50s, Barth and Hawkes in the ''60s, Pynchon, Elkin, Vonnegut, and Coover in the ''70s; DeLillo, Atwood, Morrison, and García Márquez in the ''80s; Auster, Amy Tan, David Foster Wallace, and Nurrudin Farah in the ''90s; and Lorrie Moore and Mark Danielewski in the new century. Readers go to Critique for critical essays on new authors with emerging reputations, but the general focus of the journal is fiction after 1950 from any country. Critique is published five times a year.
期刊最新文献
Metabibliographic Fiction: Metafiction After the Death of the Book in Steven Hall’s Maxwell’s Demon and Nicola Barker’s I Am Sovereign ’’I’m a Woman. Man, Woman, M–Woman.’’ – Identity, Sexuality, and the Body in the Short Fiction of Malika Moustadraf Driving While Brown: The American Road Trip in H.M. Naqvi’s Home Boy “A Look at the Gaze in Tolkien’s The Lord of the Rings” Frontier Stories: Burnt Shadows and an Alternative Ethic of Narrativizing Violence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1