The efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid administration among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IF 1.5 Q3 ORTHOPEDICS Shoulder and Elbow Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1177/17585732231207972
Mahdi Yousef Alyousef, Sadiq Issa Alaqaili, Mohammed Ali Alzayer, Ali Sultan Alsultan, Ammar J Abusultan, Mohammad M Alzahrani, Saad M Alqahtani
{"title":"The efficacy of preoperative tranexamic acid administration among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials","authors":"Mahdi Yousef Alyousef, Sadiq Issa Alaqaili, Mohammed Ali Alzayer, Ali Sultan Alsultan, Ammar J Abusultan, Mohammad M Alzahrani, Saad M Alqahtani","doi":"10.1177/17585732231207972","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods Five databases were screened until December 18, 2022. The included RCTs were assessed for risk of bias, and the endpoints were summarized as mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model. Results Seven RCTs with 510 patients (TXA = 261 and control/placebo = 249) were analyzed. The overall risk of bias was “low” and “unclear” in four and three RCTs, respectively. The mean operative time (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −9.64 min, 95% CI [−15.74, −3.54], p = 0.002) and mean postoperative pain score on postoperative day 1 (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −0.56, 95% CI [−1.06, −0.05], p = 0.03) were significantly reduced in the TXA group compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between both groups regarding visual clarity, amount of irrigation solution, and estimated intraoperative blood loss. Conclusion Among patients undergoing ARCR, preoperative TXA did not reduce intraoperative blood loss or improve visual clarity. However, TXA administration correlated with significant reductions (statistically) in operative time and postoperative day 1 pain score compared with the control group. Level of evidence: Level I; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732231207972","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim To conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that investigated the effectiveness of tranexamic acid (TXA) among patients undergoing arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods Five databases were screened until December 18, 2022. The included RCTs were assessed for risk of bias, and the endpoints were summarized as mean difference/standardized mean difference (MD/SMD) or risk ratio (RR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) in a random-effects model. Results Seven RCTs with 510 patients (TXA = 261 and control/placebo = 249) were analyzed. The overall risk of bias was “low” and “unclear” in four and three RCTs, respectively. The mean operative time (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −9.64 min, 95% CI [−15.74, −3.54], p = 0.002) and mean postoperative pain score on postoperative day 1 (n = 5 RCTs, MD = −0.56, 95% CI [−1.06, −0.05], p = 0.03) were significantly reduced in the TXA group compared with the control group. However, there were no significant differences between both groups regarding visual clarity, amount of irrigation solution, and estimated intraoperative blood loss. Conclusion Among patients undergoing ARCR, preoperative TXA did not reduce intraoperative blood loss or improve visual clarity. However, TXA administration correlated with significant reductions (statistically) in operative time and postoperative day 1 pain score compared with the control group. Level of evidence: Level I; Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
关节镜下肩袖修复术患者术前给予氨甲环酸的疗效:随机对照试验的系统回顾和荟萃分析
目的对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行系统回顾和荟萃分析,研究氨甲环酸(TXA)在接受关节镜下肩袖修复(ARCR)患者中的有效性。方法筛选5个数据库至2022年12月18日。对纳入的rct进行偏倚风险评估,终点总结为随机效应模型中95%可信区间的均差/标准化均差(MD/SMD)或风险比(RR)。结果7项随机对照试验共510例患者(TXA = 261例,对照组/安慰剂= 249例)。在4项和3项随机对照试验中,总体偏倚风险分别为“低”和“不明确”。与对照组相比,TXA组的平均手术时间(n = 5 RCTs, MD = - 9.64 min, 95% CI [- 15.74, - 3.54], p = 0.002)和术后第1天的平均疼痛评分(n = 5 RCTs, MD = - 0.56, 95% CI [- 1.06, - 0.05], p = 0.03)均显著降低。然而,两组在视觉清晰度、冲洗液量和估计术中出血量方面没有显著差异。结论在接受ARCR的患者中,术前TXA并没有减少术中出血量或改善视力。然而,与对照组相比,TXA给药与手术时间和术后第1天疼痛评分显著减少(统计学上)相关。证据等级:一级;随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shoulder and Elbow
Shoulder and Elbow Medicine-Rehabilitation
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊最新文献
Epidemiology of acromioclavicular joint separations presenting to emergency departments in the United States between 2004 and 2023. Arthroscopic rotator cuff repair with bioinductive patch achieves equivalent patient-reported outcomes and retear rate at 1 year. Patterns of management for post-traumatic elbow stiffness: A comparative study of open and arthroscopic approaches. Stress shielding influences shoulder function after reverse shoulder arthroplasty using a short stem at minimum 2 years follow-up and can be predicted using a preoperative planning software: A retrospective cohort study. Response to the Letter-to-the-Editor by Dr H Duansuperwong and Prof. V Wiwanitkit.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1