ML-Based Approach to Predict Carotid Arterial Blood Flow Dynamics

IF 0.6 Q3 MATHEMATICS Contemporary Mathematics Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.37256/cm.5120243224
T Raja Rani, Abdullah Al Shibli, Mohamed Siraj, Woshan Srimal, Nooh Zayid Suwaid Al Bakri, T S L Radhika
{"title":"ML-Based Approach to Predict Carotid Arterial Blood Flow Dynamics","authors":"T Raja Rani, Abdullah Al Shibli, Mohamed Siraj, Woshan Srimal, Nooh Zayid Suwaid Al Bakri, T S L Radhika","doi":"10.37256/cm.5120243224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the current study, a numerical model has been developed to simulate the blood flow characteristics in the human carotid artery. The data thus generated is analyzed to understand the blood flow variations and predict the flow characteristics using Machine Learning techniques. In developing the numerical model, the key features of the system, namely, the blood, is modeled as an incompressible Newtonian fluid, and the artery is an elastic pipe. This model is simulated using COMSOL software by varying the material properties of the artery. Univariate analysis was performed to gain insight into the features' behaviour and target variables. Subsequently, machine-learning regression models were trained using the data generated from the idealized human carotid artery. Furthermore, the validity of the data was ensured by comparing it with flow division ratios available in the literature. The evaluation of these models was conducted by calculating the Mean Absolute Error values for the test dataset, resulting in the following values: polynomial regressor (0.0106), hyper-tuned support vector regressor (0.0487), decision tree regressor (0.000), random forest regressor (0.0156), Adaboost (0.0508), gradient-boosting (0.0044), and XGboost (0.0043). A quantile loss function was employed to assess the prediction uncertainty. According to the theory of loss function, models with low loss values are considered good predictors. The prediction uncertainty was measured by applying quantile loss function, and it identified that the random forest regressor as the best predictor model for the data, followed by the polynomial regression of degree 3. Prediction intervals for the target variable were computed by leveraging the random forest quantile regressor model. Moreover, the developed polynomial model was utilized to investigate the presence of stenosis in the artery.","PeriodicalId":29767,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Mathematics","volume":"104 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37256/cm.5120243224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the current study, a numerical model has been developed to simulate the blood flow characteristics in the human carotid artery. The data thus generated is analyzed to understand the blood flow variations and predict the flow characteristics using Machine Learning techniques. In developing the numerical model, the key features of the system, namely, the blood, is modeled as an incompressible Newtonian fluid, and the artery is an elastic pipe. This model is simulated using COMSOL software by varying the material properties of the artery. Univariate analysis was performed to gain insight into the features' behaviour and target variables. Subsequently, machine-learning regression models were trained using the data generated from the idealized human carotid artery. Furthermore, the validity of the data was ensured by comparing it with flow division ratios available in the literature. The evaluation of these models was conducted by calculating the Mean Absolute Error values for the test dataset, resulting in the following values: polynomial regressor (0.0106), hyper-tuned support vector regressor (0.0487), decision tree regressor (0.000), random forest regressor (0.0156), Adaboost (0.0508), gradient-boosting (0.0044), and XGboost (0.0043). A quantile loss function was employed to assess the prediction uncertainty. According to the theory of loss function, models with low loss values are considered good predictors. The prediction uncertainty was measured by applying quantile loss function, and it identified that the random forest regressor as the best predictor model for the data, followed by the polynomial regression of degree 3. Prediction intervals for the target variable were computed by leveraging the random forest quantile regressor model. Moreover, the developed polynomial model was utilized to investigate the presence of stenosis in the artery.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于ml的颈动脉血流动力学预测方法
在目前的研究中,已经开发了一个数值模型来模拟人颈动脉的血流特性。分析由此产生的数据,以了解血流变化,并使用机器学习技术预测血流特征。在开发数值模型时,系统的关键特征,即血液,被建模为不可压缩的牛顿流体,动脉是弹性管道。通过改变动脉的材料特性,使用COMSOL软件对该模型进行模拟。进行单变量分析以深入了解特征的行为和目标变量。随后,使用从理想的人类颈动脉生成的数据训练机器学习回归模型。此外,通过将数据与文献中可用的分流比进行比较,确保了数据的有效性。通过计算测试数据集的Mean Absolute Error值对这些模型进行评估,得到多项式回归量(0.0106)、超调支持向量回归量(0.0487)、决策树回归量(0.000)、随机森林回归量(0.0156)、Adaboost(0.0508)、梯度增强(0.0044)和XGboost(0.0043)。采用分位数损失函数评估预测不确定性。根据损失函数理论,具有低损失值的模型被认为是良好的预测器。采用分位数损失函数对预测不确定性进行了测量,结果表明随机森林回归模型是该数据的最佳预测模型,其次是3次多项式回归模型。利用随机森林分位数回归模型计算目标变量的预测区间。此外,利用所建立的多项式模型来研究动脉是否存在狭窄。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Algorithm Optimizer in GA-LSTM for Stock Price Forecasting Controllability of Hilfer Fractional Semilinear Integro-Differential Equation of Order α ∊ (0, 1), β ∊ [0, 1] A Study on Approximate Controllability of Ψ-Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Impulsive Effects A Study of Some Problems on the Dirichlet Characters (mod q) Topological Indices and Properties of the Prime Ideal Graph of a Commutative Ring and Its Line Graph
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1