Evaluating Representation in Science Through a Peer-Reviewed Research Study

CourseSource Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.24918/cs.2023.41
Cissy J. Ballen, Abby E. Beatty, Enya Granados
{"title":"Evaluating Representation in Science Through a Peer-Reviewed Research Study","authors":"Cissy J. Ballen, Abby E. Beatty, Enya Granados","doi":"10.24918/cs.2023.41","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demographic representation of scientists featured in biology curricular materials do not match that of the undergraduate biology student population or of the U.S. population. In this lesson, we promote awareness of inequity in science through an exercise that encourages students to think about who is depicted as scientists in science curricular materials&mdash;specifically, biology textbooks. After a brief lecture on the scientific method, students read an excerpt from the introduction of a peer-reviewed publication that provides background information on the importance of representation in science. Next, students collect data from their own biology textbook about the representation of scientists who possess different identities and make a table depicting their results. Then, students fill in predictive graphs about demographic representation over time with respect to scientist identities including perceived gender and race/ethnicity. Students compare their predictions with the results from the peer-reviewed article and discuss the implications of the results. Finally, students apply their new knowledge by designing an experiment that would examine representation of an alternative scientist identity, such as age. Students conclude by answering questions that gauge their knowledge of the scientific method. This activity uses a peer-reviewed publication as well as authentic data generated by the student to increase ideological awareness and teach societal influences on the process of science. <em>Primary Image:</em>&nbsp;Many stacked textbooks. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Downloaded from <a href=\"https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Many_Old_books.jpg\">Wikimedia Commons</a> on May 30, 2023 by authors.","PeriodicalId":72713,"journal":{"name":"CourseSource","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CourseSource","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24918/cs.2023.41","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demographic representation of scientists featured in biology curricular materials do not match that of the undergraduate biology student population or of the U.S. population. In this lesson, we promote awareness of inequity in science through an exercise that encourages students to think about who is depicted as scientists in science curricular materials—specifically, biology textbooks. After a brief lecture on the scientific method, students read an excerpt from the introduction of a peer-reviewed publication that provides background information on the importance of representation in science. Next, students collect data from their own biology textbook about the representation of scientists who possess different identities and make a table depicting their results. Then, students fill in predictive graphs about demographic representation over time with respect to scientist identities including perceived gender and race/ethnicity. Students compare their predictions with the results from the peer-reviewed article and discuss the implications of the results. Finally, students apply their new knowledge by designing an experiment that would examine representation of an alternative scientist identity, such as age. Students conclude by answering questions that gauge their knowledge of the scientific method. This activity uses a peer-reviewed publication as well as authentic data generated by the student to increase ideological awareness and teach societal influences on the process of science. Primary Image: Many stacked textbooks. Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 Downloaded from Wikimedia Commons on May 30, 2023 by authors.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过同行评议研究评估科学中的代表性
生物学课程材料中科学家的人口统计学代表与生物学本科生或美国人口的人口统计学代表不匹配。在这节课中,我们通过一个练习来提高学生对科学不平等的认识,这个练习鼓励学生思考在科学课程材料中,特别是在生物教科书中,谁被描绘成科学家。在关于科学方法的简短讲座之后,学生们阅读了一篇摘录自同行评审出版物的介绍,该出版物提供了代表性在科学中的重要性的背景信息。接下来,学生们从他们自己的生物学教科书中收集关于具有不同身份的科学家的代表的数据,并制作一个表格来描述他们的结果。然后,学生们填写关于科学家身份的预测图表,包括感知到的性别和种族/民族。学生们将他们的预测与同行评议文章的结果进行比较,并讨论结果的含义。最后,学生们通过设计一个实验来应用他们的新知识,这个实验将检验另一种科学家身份的代表,比如年龄。学生通过回答问题来衡量他们对科学方法的了解程度。该活动使用同行评审的出版物以及学生生成的真实数据来提高思想意识并教授社会对科学过程的影响。主要形象:许多堆叠的教科书。2023年5月30日由作者从维基共享资源下载。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Engaging Students in Pharmacogenetics: Patient Case Studies Using the PharmGKB Website. Who’s That Speci-Mon? Using PokémonTM to Understand Biological Terminology Using Greek and Latin Roots A Simple Method for Predicting a Molecule's Biological Properties From Its Polarity Good Drug, Bad Practice: Tackling the Ivermectin Fiasco Defining and Understanding Pathogenic Disease: An Engaging Activity That Connects Students’ Lived Experiences With Their Academic Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1