‘If we do not worship idols, then we worship sin in every possible way’: The topoi of pagan sacrifice in a late 17th century sermon

Q4 Arts and Humanities Shagi/ Steps Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-29-46
A. I. Popovich
{"title":"‘If we do not worship idols, then we worship sin in every possible way’: The topoi of pagan sacrifice in a late 17th century sermon","authors":"A. I. Popovich","doi":"10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-29-46","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines the specificity of late 17th century preachers’ employment of the topoi of sacrifice to a demon/idol/devil, which have their roots in biblical and Church Fathers’ denunciations of paganism. The article mostly focuses on sermons from the little-studied handwritten collection Statir, created by an unknown author in the Kama Region, and on sermons from the collection Spiritual Dinner (Rus. Obed Dushevnyi) by Simeon Polotsky. The works of Dimitry Rostovsky are also used to reconstruct the multidimensional context of polemics. These authors are united by their increased focus on contemporaneousness, and by their desire to offer the listener/reader by means of homilies an ideal of salvation (including ‘everyday martyrdom’), contrasting it with ‘sacrifice to idols’. The study identified sources of the topoi chosen by the authors: biblical books, the works of John Chrysostom, and sermons from the Didactic Gospel (1619) by Cyril Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky. The article shows that the circumstances which prompted the preachers to turn to these common places were the church schism and the increasing opposition of the church and state to superstition and other ‘pagan matters’. In the atmosphere of an age of change, scholars sought to combat sin through spiritual enlightenment of the flock, appealing to the inner world of man while avoiding unnecessary formalisation of their work by adapting topoi to current circumstances.","PeriodicalId":36644,"journal":{"name":"Shagi/ Steps","volume":"121 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shagi/ Steps","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22394/2412-9410-2023-9-1-29-46","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the specificity of late 17th century preachers’ employment of the topoi of sacrifice to a demon/idol/devil, which have their roots in biblical and Church Fathers’ denunciations of paganism. The article mostly focuses on sermons from the little-studied handwritten collection Statir, created by an unknown author in the Kama Region, and on sermons from the collection Spiritual Dinner (Rus. Obed Dushevnyi) by Simeon Polotsky. The works of Dimitry Rostovsky are also used to reconstruct the multidimensional context of polemics. These authors are united by their increased focus on contemporaneousness, and by their desire to offer the listener/reader by means of homilies an ideal of salvation (including ‘everyday martyrdom’), contrasting it with ‘sacrifice to idols’. The study identified sources of the topoi chosen by the authors: biblical books, the works of John Chrysostom, and sermons from the Didactic Gospel (1619) by Cyril Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky. The article shows that the circumstances which prompted the preachers to turn to these common places were the church schism and the increasing opposition of the church and state to superstition and other ‘pagan matters’. In the atmosphere of an age of change, scholars sought to combat sin through spiritual enlightenment of the flock, appealing to the inner world of man while avoiding unnecessary formalisation of their work by adapting topoi to current circumstances.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“如果我们不崇拜偶像,那么我们就是在以各种可能的方式崇拜罪恶”:17世纪晚期一次布道中对异教徒献祭的主题
本文考察了17世纪晚期传教士对恶魔/偶像/魔鬼献祭的主题的特殊性,这些主题源于圣经和教会神父对异教的谴责。这篇文章主要集中在很少被研究的手写文集《Statir》中的布道,它是由一个不知名的作者在卡马地区创作的,以及《精神晚餐》(罗斯文)中的布道。《奥贝德·杜什夫尼》,西蒙·波洛茨基著。德米特里·罗斯托夫斯基的作品也被用来重建辩论的多维语境。这些作者的共同之处是,他们越来越关注当代性,他们希望通过布道为听众/读者提供一种救赎的理想(包括“日常殉道”),并将其与“向偶像献祭”进行对比。该研究确定了作者选择的主题的来源:圣经书籍,约翰·金口的作品,以及西里尔·特兰奇利翁-斯塔夫罗维茨基(Cyril Tranquillion-Stavrovetsky)的说教福音(1619)中的布道。文章表明,促使传教士转向这些公共场所的环境是教会分裂以及教会和国家对迷信和其他“异教事物”的日益反对。在变革时代的氛围中,学者们试图通过对羊群的精神启蒙来对抗罪恶,呼吁人的内心世界,同时通过调整主题来避免不必要的形式化工作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Shagi/ Steps
Shagi/ Steps Arts and Humanities-Arts and Humanities (all)
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊最新文献
Alfonso X and his “History of Spain”: Translation and publication of a monument of medieval historiography Shadows of rediscovered tradition: Postconciliar perspective on relations between the bishops of Rome and Spain in the First millennium Alexander R. Korsunsky: The combat experience of a medievalist Continuity, transformation and extinction of the curiae in Spain from the 4th to the 9th centuries Dracontius as propagandist and historian: Didactic meaning of Roman history in De Laudibus Dei
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1