Survival analysis for cohort of Bhopal gas disaster victims during 1985-2015

IF 0.8 Q4 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_190_22
Dharma Raj, Sushil Singh, Yogesh Sabde, Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, RajnarayanRamshankar Tiwari
{"title":"Survival analysis for cohort of Bhopal gas disaster victims during 1985-2015","authors":"Dharma Raj, Sushil Singh, Yogesh Sabde, Madhanraj Kalyanasundaram, RajnarayanRamshankar Tiwari","doi":"10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_190_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Context: After the gas tragedy on the night of December 2/3, 1984, at Bhopal, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) started following up on four population cohorts with different levels of post-disaster mortality from December 3–6, 1984. Aims: The present study was undertaken to estimate the survival time of the cohort, and investigate the risk of mortality based on exposure, gender, and median age. Settings and Design: Survival analysis is generally used to evaluate factors associated with the time to an event of failure or death among any covered population. Methods and Materials: To know the cause of death and mortality rate, a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on the outcomes of 92,320 individuals with an exposed and non-exposed group from 1985 to 2015 in Bhopal, India. Statistical Analysis Used: Basic survival analysis method, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to analyze the mortality risk. Results: During the past 30 years, the survivability was 87.25%, and the mortality rate was 7.2% for the cohort population of Bhopal gas survivors. Cox regression analysis showed that exposed, males, and individuals above 21 years (at the time of the disaster) were at higher risk of mortality from 1985 to 2015. Conclusions: During the initial two phases, the mortality was higher in the exposed group, but over time, their survival turned out to be the same in both groups.","PeriodicalId":43585,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijoem.ijoem_190_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: After the gas tragedy on the night of December 2/3, 1984, at Bhopal, the Indian Council of Medical Research (ICMR) started following up on four population cohorts with different levels of post-disaster mortality from December 3–6, 1984. Aims: The present study was undertaken to estimate the survival time of the cohort, and investigate the risk of mortality based on exposure, gender, and median age. Settings and Design: Survival analysis is generally used to evaluate factors associated with the time to an event of failure or death among any covered population. Methods and Materials: To know the cause of death and mortality rate, a retrospective cohort analysis was conducted on the outcomes of 92,320 individuals with an exposed and non-exposed group from 1985 to 2015 in Bhopal, India. Statistical Analysis Used: Basic survival analysis method, Kaplan–Meier method, and Cox proportional hazard regression model were used to analyze the mortality risk. Results: During the past 30 years, the survivability was 87.25%, and the mortality rate was 7.2% for the cohort population of Bhopal gas survivors. Cox regression analysis showed that exposed, males, and individuals above 21 years (at the time of the disaster) were at higher risk of mortality from 1985 to 2015. Conclusions: During the initial two phases, the mortality was higher in the exposed group, but over time, their survival turned out to be the same in both groups.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
1985-2015年博帕尔毒气灾害受害者队列生存分析
背景:1984年12月2/3日晚上在博帕尔发生毒气惨案后,印度医学研究委员会(ICMR)开始对1984年12月3-6日四个灾后死亡率水平不同的人群进行跟踪调查。目的:本研究旨在估计该队列的生存时间,并调查基于暴露、性别和中位年龄的死亡风险。环境和设计:生存分析通常用于评估任何被调查人群中与失败或死亡事件发生时间相关的因素。方法与材料:为了解死亡原因和死亡率,对1985 - 2015年印度博帕尔92320例暴露组和非暴露组的结果进行回顾性队列分析。统计学分析方法:采用基本生存分析方法、Kaplan-Meier法和Cox比例风险回归模型分析死亡风险。结果:30年间博帕尔毒气幸存者的生存率为87.25%,死亡率为7.2%。Cox回归分析显示,1985 - 2015年,暴露者、男性和21岁以上(灾难发生时)的个体死亡风险较高。结论:在最初的两个阶段,暴露组的死亡率较高,但随着时间的推移,两组的存活率相同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine
Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊介绍: The website of Indian Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine aims to make the printed version of the journal available to the scientific community on the web. The site is purely for educational purpose of the medical community. The site does not cater to the needs of individual patients and is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between a patient/site visitor and his/her existing physician.
期刊最新文献
An Exploratory Study on Self-Reported Auditory Symptoms and Hearing Loss among Workers in a Small-Scale LPG Plant. Assessment of Indoor Particulate Matter and Teacher's Perceived Indoor Climate in Government Schools of Bilaspur District, Chhattisgarh, India: A Cross-Sectional Study. Depression, Anxiety and Stress Symptoms among Afghan Healthcare Workers: A Cross-Sectional Analytical Study. Developing Practical Tools for Improving Safety and Health of Small Enterprises and Informal Economy Workplaces. Effect of Training of Adolescents on Household Environmental Safety from Childhood Injuries in a Rural Area of Delhi.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1