Students’ Argumentative Ability in the Graduate Thesis Introductions

Ideas Pub Date : 2023-09-23 DOI:10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3624
Annisa Annisa
{"title":"Students’ Argumentative Ability in the Graduate Thesis Introductions","authors":"Annisa Annisa","doi":"10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3624","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research aimed to explore the students’ argumentative ability in their thesis introduction and to explore the most difficult moves for students in their thesis introduction. Students’ argumentative ability refers to the way students write their thesis introductions by following swales’ pattern (1990). Swales’ Pattern consist of three moves, establishing a research territory, establishing a niche, and occupying the niche.This research used a Descriptive Quantitative Method. The sample of this research were graduate students thesis from the Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021. The total sample was sixteen graduate students thesis. The procedure of this research was collected by analysing the students’ thesis introduction by using a rubric.The results of research found that 1) Students’ argumentative ability in the graduate thesis introductions was good which the students wrote their introduction by claiming the importance of the research (move 1 step 1), reviewing items of previous research (move 1 step 2), indicating a gap (move 2 step 2) and outlining the purposes (move 3 step 1). 2) The most difficult moves for students were move one step two (reviewing items of previous research), and move two step one (indicating a gap). It was identified based on the lowest score got by the students in each move. Therefore, it can be concluded that in writing thesis introductions, the students from Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021 followed Swales’ Pattern (1990).","PeriodicalId":34645,"journal":{"name":"Ideas","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ideas","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24256/ideas.v11i2.3624","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research aimed to explore the students’ argumentative ability in their thesis introduction and to explore the most difficult moves for students in their thesis introduction. Students’ argumentative ability refers to the way students write their thesis introductions by following swales’ pattern (1990). Swales’ Pattern consist of three moves, establishing a research territory, establishing a niche, and occupying the niche.This research used a Descriptive Quantitative Method. The sample of this research were graduate students thesis from the Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021. The total sample was sixteen graduate students thesis. The procedure of this research was collected by analysing the students’ thesis introduction by using a rubric.The results of research found that 1) Students’ argumentative ability in the graduate thesis introductions was good which the students wrote their introduction by claiming the importance of the research (move 1 step 1), reviewing items of previous research (move 1 step 2), indicating a gap (move 2 step 2) and outlining the purposes (move 3 step 1). 2) The most difficult moves for students were move one step two (reviewing items of previous research), and move two step one (indicating a gap). It was identified based on the lowest score got by the students in each move. Therefore, it can be concluded that in writing thesis introductions, the students from Graduate Program of English Language Education at Muhammadiyah University of Makassar who completed their studies in 2021 followed Swales’ Pattern (1990).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
研究生论文导论中学生的议论文能力
本研究旨在探讨学生在论文导论中的议论文能力,探讨学生在论文导论中最困难的动作。学生的议论文能力是指学生按照swales(1990)的模式撰写论文介绍的方式。斯韦尔斯模式包括建立研究领域、建立生态位和占领生态位三个步骤。本研究采用描述性定量方法。本研究的样本为2021年完成学业的望加锡穆罕默德迪亚大学英语语言教育研究生项目的研究生论文。总样本为16篇研究生论文。本研究的过程是通过分析学生的论文介绍,用一个标题收集。研究结果发现:1)学生好辩的能力在学生的毕业论文介绍很好写他们的介绍声称这项研究的重要性(移动1步骤1),审查项目的先前的研究(移动1步骤2),表明一个缺口(移动2步骤2)和概述(移动3步骤1)。2)学生最困难的举措是一步两个先前的研究(检查项目),并将两个第一步(指示差距)。它是根据学生在每个动作中获得的最低分数来确定的。因此,可以得出结论,2021年完成学业的望加锡穆罕默德迪亚大学英语语言教育研究生课程的学生在撰写论文介绍时遵循了Swales(1990)的模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Philippe Colin, Lissell Quiroz, Pensées décoloniales. Une introduction aux théories critiques d’Amérique latine Le documentaire engagé : sport dans les Amériques La batalla cultural en la década los 60. La ley 14.101 y los docentes como enemigos de la Nación Elizabeth Kelly Gray, Habit Forming: Drug Addiction in America, 1776-1914 La persecución penal de los crímenes de las dictaduras de Chile y Uruguay. A 50 años de los golpes de Estado
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1