Impact of protection methods and abiotic factors on Nothofagus pumilio seedlings mortality in Torres del Paine National Park, Chile

IF 1.1 Q3 FORESTRY Journal of forest science Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.17221/45/2023-jfs
Martin Smola, Josef Cafourek, Antonín Kusbach, Martin Šenfeldr, Josef Střítecký, Petr Maděra
{"title":"Impact of protection methods and abiotic factors on Nothofagus pumilio seedlings mortality in Torres del Paine National Park, Chile","authors":"Martin Smola, Josef Cafourek, Antonín Kusbach, Martin Šenfeldr, Josef Střítecký, Petr Maděra","doi":"10.17221/45/2023-jfs","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<br>National parks (NP) are the last refugia of forests dominated by the <i>Nothofagus</i> species in Chile. However, frequent, careless human-caused fires are destroying these forests even within the national parks. After large-scale fires, <i>N. pumilio</i> stands are unable to recover naturally neither in generative nor in vegetative ways and artificial regeneration must be resorted to in order to maintain their extent. However, even artificial regeneration is not successful without protection against browsing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to experimentally test a range of repellents and other methods of mechanical protection of seedlings against browsing. Five replicates of plots were placed in Torres del Paine NP, in different habitat conditions and with different methods of protection against browsing (11 repellents, wire mesh, plastic tube and control). In each plot, 12 seedlings were treated with each type of protection. In our experiment, only 8% of the seedlings were damaged by browsing, while the mortality rate was 38%. The results indicate a more significant effect of abiotic factors (mainly frost, drought or wind) on seedling mortality than browsing. In parallel, however, it is clear that, compared with the control, six of the eleven repellents used in the experiment showed a significantly positive effect. We suggest the use of plastic tubes as the best option to protect seedlings, which, in addition to providing 100% protection against browsing, are likely to provide more favourable microclimatic conditions for seedlings, similar to leaving the burned snags.","PeriodicalId":16011,"journal":{"name":"Journal of forest science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of forest science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17221/45/2023-jfs","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract


National parks (NP) are the last refugia of forests dominated by the Nothofagus species in Chile. However, frequent, careless human-caused fires are destroying these forests even within the national parks. After large-scale fires, N. pumilio stands are unable to recover naturally neither in generative nor in vegetative ways and artificial regeneration must be resorted to in order to maintain their extent. However, even artificial regeneration is not successful without protection against browsing. Therefore, the aim of this study was to experimentally test a range of repellents and other methods of mechanical protection of seedlings against browsing. Five replicates of plots were placed in Torres del Paine NP, in different habitat conditions and with different methods of protection against browsing (11 repellents, wire mesh, plastic tube and control). In each plot, 12 seedlings were treated with each type of protection. In our experiment, only 8% of the seedlings were damaged by browsing, while the mortality rate was 38%. The results indicate a more significant effect of abiotic factors (mainly frost, drought or wind) on seedling mortality than browsing. In parallel, however, it is clear that, compared with the control, six of the eleven repellents used in the experiment showed a significantly positive effect. We suggest the use of plastic tubes as the best option to protect seedlings, which, in addition to providing 100% protection against browsing, are likely to provide more favourable microclimatic conditions for seedlings, similar to leaving the burned snags.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
保护方法及非生物因素对智利托里斯德尔潘恩国家公园矮叶蓟幼苗死亡率的影响
国家公园(NP)是最后的避难所ofÂ森林主导by Nothofagus物种inÂ智利。然而,频繁的、粗心的人为火灾正在摧毁这些森林,甚至在国家公园内。在大规模火灾之后,N. pumilio林分无法toÂ自然恢复,无论是inÂ生殖方式还是inÂ营养方式,人工再生都必须beÂ诉诸to inÂ以toÂ维持其范围。然而,如果没有防止浏览的保护,即使人工再生isÂ也不会成功。因此,ofÂ本研究的目的是toÂ实验测试aÂ范围ofÂ驱避剂和其他方法ofÂ机械保护ofÂ幼苗免受浏览。5个重复ofÂ样地分别放置in Torres del Paine NP、inÂ不同生境条件和不同防虫方法(11Â驱虫剂、丝网、塑料管和对照)ofÂ。InÂ每个小区,12Â苗木分别进行不同类型ofÂ保护处理。InÂ在我们的实验中,只有8% ofÂ的幼苗被破坏byÂ浏览,而死亡率为38%。结果表明aÂ对ofÂ非生物因子(主要是霜冻、干旱orÂ风)onÂ幼苗死亡率的影响比浏览更显著。然而InÂ平行,it isÂ明确,与对照相比,6 of 11种驱蚊剂使用inÂ实验显示aÂ显著的积极作用。WeÂ建议使用ofÂ塑料管asÂ最好的选择toÂ保护幼苗,其中,inÂ加上toÂ提供100%的保护,防止浏览,可能toÂ为幼苗提供更有利的小气候条件,类似toÂ留下烧伤的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
9.10%
发文量
48
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊介绍: Original results of basic and applied research from all fields of forestry related to European forest ecosystems and their functions including those in the landscape and wood production chain are published in original scientific papers, short communications and review articles. Papers are published in English
期刊最新文献
Change in forest species composition and its projections into the economy of forest owners Over- and under-bark volume estimation of European larch timber produced by mechanised harvesting in Czechia Overgrazing strongly impedes the natural regeneration of the endemic Boswellia species on Socotra Island Innovations in the methodological approach to quantifying and evaluating the supported effects of forests for recreational and educational ecosystem services Calculation and operational assessment of tyre contact areas in the tractor-and-trailer unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1