Grounding, framing, and problematising research in online, distance and digital education (ODDE)

Q1 Social Sciences AAOU Journal Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1108/aaouj-11-2022-0166
David C.L. Lim, Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Insung Jung
{"title":"Grounding, framing, and problematising research in online, distance and digital education (ODDE)","authors":"David C.L. Lim, Olaf Zawacki-Richter, Insung Jung","doi":"10.1108/aaouj-11-2022-0166","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper engages Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Insung Jung in a frank and penetrating conversation that seeks to ground, frame, and problematise research in the field conceptualised as “open, distance and digital education” (ODDE). Taking as starting point the recent publication of the landmark Handbook of Open, Distance, and Digital Education (2022), it segues into a broad critique of the shortcomings of ODDE research, the importance of knowledge production on the meso- and macro-levels, the autonomy of ODDE as a field coming into its own, the place of postfoundationalism in ODDE discourse, and related topics that are pivotal in ODDE today. Design/methodology/approach The semi-structured interview was employed as the primary qualitative research method. Findings The research imperative of the relatively young but complex field of ODDE today is not the incessant reiteration of the same but rather a strategic reorientation that, first, circumvents the well-documented yet too-often-overlooked shortcomings of ODDE research and, second, promotes transboundary collaborations with the potential for system-wide impact. Originality/value This novel interview-based critique of ODDE research demonstrates that extending the scholarly discourse beyond the conventional report format is a productive method for enriching conversations on ODDE and vitalising the field itself.","PeriodicalId":32802,"journal":{"name":"AAOU Journal","volume":"61 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AAOU Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/aaouj-11-2022-0166","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Purpose This paper engages Olaf Zawacki-Richter and Insung Jung in a frank and penetrating conversation that seeks to ground, frame, and problematise research in the field conceptualised as “open, distance and digital education” (ODDE). Taking as starting point the recent publication of the landmark Handbook of Open, Distance, and Digital Education (2022), it segues into a broad critique of the shortcomings of ODDE research, the importance of knowledge production on the meso- and macro-levels, the autonomy of ODDE as a field coming into its own, the place of postfoundationalism in ODDE discourse, and related topics that are pivotal in ODDE today. Design/methodology/approach The semi-structured interview was employed as the primary qualitative research method. Findings The research imperative of the relatively young but complex field of ODDE today is not the incessant reiteration of the same but rather a strategic reorientation that, first, circumvents the well-documented yet too-often-overlooked shortcomings of ODDE research and, second, promotes transboundary collaborations with the potential for system-wide impact. Originality/value This novel interview-based critique of ODDE research demonstrates that extending the scholarly discourse beyond the conventional report format is a productive method for enriching conversations on ODDE and vitalising the field itself.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在线、远程和数字教育(ODDE)的基础、框架和问题研究
本文邀请奥拉夫·扎瓦奇-里希特和荣仁成进行了一场坦率而深入的对话,旨在为“开放、远程和数字教育”(ODDE)领域的研究奠定基础、构建框架并提出问题。本文以最近出版的具有里程碑意义的《开放、远程和数字教育手册》(2022)为出发点,对ODDE研究的缺陷、知识生产在中观和宏观层面的重要性、ODDE作为一个领域的自主性、后基础主义在ODDE话语中的地位以及当今ODDE中至关重要的相关主题进行了广泛的批评。设计/方法/方法采用半结构化访谈作为主要的定性研究方法。今天,在相对年轻但复杂的ODDE领域,研究的当务之急不是不断重复相同的内容,而是战略性的重新定位,首先,避免ODDE研究中有充分记录但往往被忽视的缺点,其次,促进跨界合作,可能产生全系统的影响。这一新颖的基于访谈的对ODDE研究的批评表明,将学术话语扩展到传统的报告格式之外,是丰富关于ODDE的对话并使该领域本身充满活力的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
AAOU Journal
AAOU Journal Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learner support services at distance higher education institutions in the union territory of Jammu and Kashmir The library's influence and impact on learning: a case study from The Open University (UK) Automatic essay scoring for discussion forum in online learning based on semantic and keyword similarities Examining the efficacy of online learning in nurturing students' learning: an analysis of students' experiences Gamification and its challenges in e-learning: a case study of computer science learners in KKHSOU
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1