Investigating and Analyzing Self-Reporting of Long COVID on Twitter: Findings from Sentiment Analysis

IF 3.8 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS Applied System Innovation Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.3390/asi6050092
Nirmalya Thakur
{"title":"Investigating and Analyzing Self-Reporting of Long COVID on Twitter: Findings from Sentiment Analysis","authors":"Nirmalya Thakur","doi":"10.3390/asi6050092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper presents multiple novel findings from a comprehensive analysis of a dataset comprising 1,244,051 Tweets about Long COVID, posted on Twitter between 25 May 2020 and 31 January 2023. First, the analysis shows that the average number of Tweets per month wherein individuals self-reported Long COVID on Twitter was considerably high in 2022 as compared to the average number of Tweets per month in 2021. Second, findings from sentiment analysis using VADER show that the percentages of Tweets with positive, negative, and neutral sentiments were 43.1%, 42.7%, and 14.2%, respectively. To add to this, most of the Tweets with a positive sentiment, as well as most of the Tweets with a negative sentiment, were not highly polarized. Third, the result of tokenization indicates that the tweeting patterns (in terms of the number of tokens used) were similar for the positive and negative Tweets. Analysis of these results also shows that there was no direct relationship between the number of tokens used and the intensity of the sentiment expressed in these Tweets. Finally, a granular analysis of the sentiments showed that the emotion of sadness was expressed in most of these Tweets. It was followed by the emotions of fear, neutral, surprise, anger, joy, and disgust, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36273,"journal":{"name":"Applied System Innovation","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied System Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/asi6050092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper presents multiple novel findings from a comprehensive analysis of a dataset comprising 1,244,051 Tweets about Long COVID, posted on Twitter between 25 May 2020 and 31 January 2023. First, the analysis shows that the average number of Tweets per month wherein individuals self-reported Long COVID on Twitter was considerably high in 2022 as compared to the average number of Tweets per month in 2021. Second, findings from sentiment analysis using VADER show that the percentages of Tweets with positive, negative, and neutral sentiments were 43.1%, 42.7%, and 14.2%, respectively. To add to this, most of the Tweets with a positive sentiment, as well as most of the Tweets with a negative sentiment, were not highly polarized. Third, the result of tokenization indicates that the tweeting patterns (in terms of the number of tokens used) were similar for the positive and negative Tweets. Analysis of these results also shows that there was no direct relationship between the number of tokens used and the intensity of the sentiment expressed in these Tweets. Finally, a granular analysis of the sentiments showed that the emotion of sadness was expressed in most of these Tweets. It was followed by the emotions of fear, neutral, surprise, anger, joy, and disgust, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调查和分析Twitter上长COVID的自我报告:情绪分析的结果
本文介绍了对2020年5月25日至2023年1月31日期间在Twitter上发布的关于Long COVID的1,244,051条推文的数据集进行综合分析的多项新发现。首先,分析显示,与2021年的平均每月推文数量相比,2022年个人在推特上自我报告长COVID的平均每月推文数量相当高。其次,使用VADER进行情绪分析的结果显示,积极、消极和中性情绪的推文比例分别为43.1%、42.7%和14.2%。除此之外,大多数带有积极情绪的推文,以及大多数带有消极情绪的推文,并没有高度两极分化。第三,标记化的结果表明,积极和消极推文的推文模式(就使用的令牌数量而言)是相似的。对这些结果的分析还表明,使用代币的数量与这些推文中表达的情绪强度之间没有直接关系。最后,对这些情绪的细致分析表明,这些推文中的大多数都表达了悲伤的情绪。紧随其后的情绪分别是恐惧、中性、惊讶、愤怒、喜悦和厌恶。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Applied System Innovation
Applied System Innovation Mathematics-Applied Mathematics
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
5.30%
发文量
102
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Research on Chinese Nested Entity Recognition Based on IDCNNLR and GlobalPointer AI-Powered Academic Guidance and Counseling System Based on Student Profile and Interests Using Smart Traffic Lights to Reduce CO2 Emissions and Improve Traffic Flow at Intersections: Simulation of an Intersection in a Small Portuguese City Predictive Modeling of Light–Matter Interaction in One Dimension: A Dynamic Deep Learning Approach Project Management Efficiency Measurement with Data Envelopment Analysis: A Case in a Petrochemical Company
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1