Return to work following brachial plexus injury: A cross-sectional study

IF 0.9 Q4 REHABILITATION Hand Therapy Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1177/17589983231205446
Hazel Brown, Kate Kennard, Rosalyn Tyreman, Ali Alim-Marvasti, Matthew Wilcox, Tom Quick
{"title":"Return to work following brachial plexus injury: A cross-sectional study","authors":"Hazel Brown, Kate Kennard, Rosalyn Tyreman, Ali Alim-Marvasti, Matthew Wilcox, Tom Quick","doi":"10.1177/17589983231205446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Qualitative studies following Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI) suggest that return to employment has a major influence on life satisfaction and psychological well-being. However, few studies have focused on return to work following BPI. The physical strain and intensity of an occupation may influence the ability of an individual to return to employment. This study aimed to provide information about the impact of workload intensity on employment status following BPI. Methods This is an observational, retrospective study of 74 participants who responded to a postal questionnaire, sharing information regarding their employment status pre- and post-BPI. The reported occupations were assessed for workload intensity and assigned a Reichsausschuss für Arbeitszeitermittlung (REFA) classification by two assessors. Results Forty-one out of 74 participants (57%) had to change their employment following their BPI. Changes in occupation were more likely if the pre-injury REFA score was 3 or 4 ( n = 22). In the Complete plexus injury group ( n = 8), 100% changed occupation. In the Partial plexus injury group ( n = 66) 50% changed occupation. Hand dominance had no significant influence on change of employment ( p = 0.37). Conclusion This study is the first to focus on the impact of BPI on employment status and workload intensity. Just over half the participants did not maintain the same employment following their BPI and one in five became unemployed. Future research should review the factors that contribute to the inability to return to work. This may direct enhancements in rehabilitation provision and enable healthcare services to focus on facilitating individuals back to the workplace.","PeriodicalId":43971,"journal":{"name":"Hand Therapy","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hand Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17589983231205446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Qualitative studies following Brachial Plexus Injury (BPI) suggest that return to employment has a major influence on life satisfaction and psychological well-being. However, few studies have focused on return to work following BPI. The physical strain and intensity of an occupation may influence the ability of an individual to return to employment. This study aimed to provide information about the impact of workload intensity on employment status following BPI. Methods This is an observational, retrospective study of 74 participants who responded to a postal questionnaire, sharing information regarding their employment status pre- and post-BPI. The reported occupations were assessed for workload intensity and assigned a Reichsausschuss für Arbeitszeitermittlung (REFA) classification by two assessors. Results Forty-one out of 74 participants (57%) had to change their employment following their BPI. Changes in occupation were more likely if the pre-injury REFA score was 3 or 4 ( n = 22). In the Complete plexus injury group ( n = 8), 100% changed occupation. In the Partial plexus injury group ( n = 66) 50% changed occupation. Hand dominance had no significant influence on change of employment ( p = 0.37). Conclusion This study is the first to focus on the impact of BPI on employment status and workload intensity. Just over half the participants did not maintain the same employment following their BPI and one in five became unemployed. Future research should review the factors that contribute to the inability to return to work. This may direct enhancements in rehabilitation provision and enable healthcare services to focus on facilitating individuals back to the workplace.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
臂丛神经损伤后恢复工作:一项横断面研究
背景对臂丛神经损伤(Brachial Plexus Injury, BPI)患者进行的定性研究表明,重返工作岗位对患者的生活满意度和心理健康有重要影响。然而,很少有研究关注BPI后的重返工作。职业的体力紧张和强度可能影响个人重返工作岗位的能力。本研究旨在提供工作负荷强度对BPI后就业状况的影响。这是一项观察性的回顾性研究,74名参与者回答了一份邮政问卷,分享了他们在bpi之前和之后的就业状况信息。对报告的职业进行了工作量强度评估,并由两名评估员分配了Reichsausschuss f r arbeitszeitmittlung (REFA)分类。结果74名参与者中有41人(57%)在BPI之后不得不改变他们的工作。损伤前REFA评分为3或4时,职业改变的可能性更大(n = 22)。在完全神经丛损伤组(n = 8), 100%改变了职业。部分神经丛损伤组(n = 66) 50%改变了职业。手优势对就业变化无显著影响(p = 0.37)。结论本研究首次探讨了工作绩效指数对就业状况和工作强度的影响。超过一半的参与者在BPI之后没有保持相同的工作,五分之一的人失业。未来的研究应该回顾导致无法重返工作岗位的因素。这可能会直接加强康复服务,并使医疗保健服务能够专注于促进个人重返工作场所。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hand Therapy
Hand Therapy REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
13
期刊最新文献
A survey of practice on the use of condition-specific patient reported outcome measures with patients who have distal radius fractures. The effect of preoperative interventions on postoperative outcomes following elective hand surgery: A systematic review. Exploring patient perception of decision-making in carpal tunnel release surgery: A systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies. Rehabilitation of stage-one scapholunate instability (ReSOS): An online survey of UK practice. Production time and practicability of 3D-Printed wrist orthoses versus low temperature thermoplastic wrist orthoses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1