Belief as Status: Premodern Islamic Law, Duties, and the Martyr Conundrum

IF 0.6 Q2 LAW AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1093/ajlh/njad022
Adnan A Zulfiqar
{"title":"Belief as Status: Premodern Islamic Law, Duties, and the Martyr Conundrum","authors":"Adnan A Zulfiqar","doi":"10.1093/ajlh/njad022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The normative universe of the premodern Islamic legal tradition revolves around duties. These duties are determined by an individual’s status both as an autonomous entity and as part of the collective. The duties one owes and those that one is owed, are primarily constructed around belief. Belief, and its absence, function as the primary vehicles for affirming or denying an individual’s place within the moral community. In the jurists discourse on warfare, during the fifth ah/eleventh ce and sixth ah/twelfth ce centuries, we find an illustrative example of how belief dictates the duties that must be performed. Who is obligated to fight, who must be fought, and what obligations are owed in death all depend, though not exclusively, on the belief status of the relevant actors. In the process jurists constructed status hierarchies based on belief and, as in the case of martyrs, negotiated a delicate balance between preserving the sacredness of belief status and accounting for the pragmatic requirements of the battlefield.","PeriodicalId":54164,"journal":{"name":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","volume":"34 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AMERICAN JOURNAL OF LEGAL HISTORY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ajlh/njad022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The normative universe of the premodern Islamic legal tradition revolves around duties. These duties are determined by an individual’s status both as an autonomous entity and as part of the collective. The duties one owes and those that one is owed, are primarily constructed around belief. Belief, and its absence, function as the primary vehicles for affirming or denying an individual’s place within the moral community. In the jurists discourse on warfare, during the fifth ah/eleventh ce and sixth ah/twelfth ce centuries, we find an illustrative example of how belief dictates the duties that must be performed. Who is obligated to fight, who must be fought, and what obligations are owed in death all depend, though not exclusively, on the belief status of the relevant actors. In the process jurists constructed status hierarchies based on belief and, as in the case of martyrs, negotiated a delicate balance between preserving the sacredness of belief status and accounting for the pragmatic requirements of the battlefield.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
信仰作为地位:前现代伊斯兰法律、义务和殉道者难题
前现代伊斯兰法律传统的规范世界围绕着义务展开。这些责任是由个人作为一个自治实体和作为集体的一部分的地位决定的。一个人所欠的和别人所欠的责任,主要是围绕信念构建的。信仰,以及信仰的缺失,作为肯定或否定个人在道德共同体中的地位的主要工具。在公元前5世纪/ 11世纪和公元6世纪/ 12世纪的法学家关于战争的论述中,我们发现了一个说明性的例子,说明信仰如何规定了必须履行的义务。谁有义务战斗,谁必须战斗,死亡对谁负有什么义务,这些都取决于,但并非完全取决于相关行为者的信仰状况。在这个过程中,法学家根据信仰构建了地位等级,就像在烈士的案例中一样,他们在维护信仰地位的神圣性和考虑战场的实用需求之间达成了微妙的平衡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Legal History was established in 1957 as the first English-language legal history journal. The journal remains devoted to the publication of articles and documents on the history of all legal systems. The journal is refereed, and members of the Judiciary and the Bar form the advisory board.
期刊最新文献
Letter Writing and Legal Consciousness during World War I Exemplary Damages Practice in Late Eighteenth and Early Nineteenth-Century England Alexander Hamilton's Constitutional Jurisprudence and the Bank Bill The Early Years of Congress’s Anti-Removal Power Movement on Removal: An Emerging Consensus about The First Congress and Presidential Power
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1