Dragana Filipović, Glynis Jones, Wiebke Kirleis, Amy Bogaard, Rachel Ballantyne, Michael Charles, Anne de Vareilles, Müge Ergun, Eugenia Gkatzogia, Amy Holguin, Ivanka Hristova, Angeliki Karathanou, Magda Kapcia, Dolores Knežić, Georgia Kotzamani, Pavlos Lathiras, Alexandra Livarda, Elena Marinova, Stavroula Michou, Marine Mosulishvili, Aldona Mueller-Bieniek, Djurdja Obradović, Matthew Padgett, Pelagia Paraskevopoulou, Chryssi Petridou, Haroula Stylianakou, Tanja Zerl, Doris Vidas, Soultana Maria Valamoti
{"title":"Triticum timopheevii s.l. (‘new glume wheat’) finds in regions of southern and eastern Europe across space and time","authors":"Dragana Filipović, Glynis Jones, Wiebke Kirleis, Amy Bogaard, Rachel Ballantyne, Michael Charles, Anne de Vareilles, Müge Ergun, Eugenia Gkatzogia, Amy Holguin, Ivanka Hristova, Angeliki Karathanou, Magda Kapcia, Dolores Knežić, Georgia Kotzamani, Pavlos Lathiras, Alexandra Livarda, Elena Marinova, Stavroula Michou, Marine Mosulishvili, Aldona Mueller-Bieniek, Djurdja Obradović, Matthew Padgett, Pelagia Paraskevopoulou, Chryssi Petridou, Haroula Stylianakou, Tanja Zerl, Doris Vidas, Soultana Maria Valamoti","doi":"10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Triticum timopheevii sensu lato (‘new glume wheat’, NGW) was first recognised as a distinct prehistoric cereal crop through work on archaeobotanical finds from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in northern Greece. This was later followed by its identification in archaeobotanical assemblages from other parts of Europe. This paper provides an overview of the currently known archaeobotanical finds of Timopheev’s wheat in southeastern and eastern Europe and observes their temporal span and spatial distribution. To date, there are 89 prehistoric sites with these finds, located in different parts of the study region and dated from the Neolithic to the very late Iron Age. Their latest recorded presence in the region is in the last centuries bce . For assemblages from the site as a whole containing at least 30 grain and/or chaff remains of Timopheev’s wheat, we take a brief look at the overall relative proportions of Triticum monococcum (einkorn), T. dicoccum (emmer) and T. timopheevii s.l. (Timopheev’s wheat), the three most common glume wheats in our study region in prehistory. We highlight several sites where the overall proportions of Timopheev’s wheat might be taken to suggest it was a minor component of a mixed crop (maslin), or an unmonitored inclusion in einkorn or emmer fields. At the same sites, however, there are also discrete contexts where this wheat is strongly predominant, pointing to its cultivation as a pure crop. We therefore emphasise the need to evaluate the relative representation of Timopheev’s wheat at the level of individual samples or contexts before making inferences on its cultivation status. We also encourage re-examination of prehistoric and historic cereal assemblages for its remains.","PeriodicalId":23527,"journal":{"name":"Vegetation History and Archaeobotany","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vegetation History and Archaeobotany","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00334-023-00954-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PALEONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract Triticum timopheevii sensu lato (‘new glume wheat’, NGW) was first recognised as a distinct prehistoric cereal crop through work on archaeobotanical finds from Neolithic and Bronze Age sites in northern Greece. This was later followed by its identification in archaeobotanical assemblages from other parts of Europe. This paper provides an overview of the currently known archaeobotanical finds of Timopheev’s wheat in southeastern and eastern Europe and observes their temporal span and spatial distribution. To date, there are 89 prehistoric sites with these finds, located in different parts of the study region and dated from the Neolithic to the very late Iron Age. Their latest recorded presence in the region is in the last centuries bce . For assemblages from the site as a whole containing at least 30 grain and/or chaff remains of Timopheev’s wheat, we take a brief look at the overall relative proportions of Triticum monococcum (einkorn), T. dicoccum (emmer) and T. timopheevii s.l. (Timopheev’s wheat), the three most common glume wheats in our study region in prehistory. We highlight several sites where the overall proportions of Timopheev’s wheat might be taken to suggest it was a minor component of a mixed crop (maslin), or an unmonitored inclusion in einkorn or emmer fields. At the same sites, however, there are also discrete contexts where this wheat is strongly predominant, pointing to its cultivation as a pure crop. We therefore emphasise the need to evaluate the relative representation of Timopheev’s wheat at the level of individual samples or contexts before making inferences on its cultivation status. We also encourage re-examination of prehistoric and historic cereal assemblages for its remains.
期刊介绍:
Vegetation History and Archaeobotany publishes research papers, review articles and short contributions of high quality from Europe, the Americas and other parts of the world. It covers the entire field of vegetation history – mainly the development of flora and vegetation during the Holocene (but also from the Pleistocene), and including related subjects such as palaeoecology. Of special interest is the human impact upon the natural environment in prehistoric and medieval times; this is reflected in pollen diagrams as well as in plant macroremains from archaeological contexts.