Towards an interactional grammar of interjections: Expressing compassion in four Australian languages

IF 0.4 3区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Australian Journal of Linguistics Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1080/07268602.2023.2244442
Ilana Mushin, Joe Blythe, Josua Dahmen, Caroline de Dear, Rod Gardner, Francesco Possemato, Lesley Stirling
{"title":"Towards an interactional grammar of interjections: Expressing compassion in four Australian languages","authors":"Ilana Mushin, Joe Blythe, Josua Dahmen, Caroline de Dear, Rod Gardner, Francesco Possemato, Lesley Stirling","doi":"10.1080/07268602.2023.2244442","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Words classified as ‘interjections’ tend to be treated in descriptive grammars as outside of morphosyntax, too contextually bound to warrant a systematic description of their syntagmatic relations. In this paper we argue that if one takes grammar to include recurrent patterns in conversational turns that are routinely connected with particular interactional functions, such as assessments and acknowledgements, then the grammar of interjections can indeed be incorporated into language description in ways that show the systematic relationships between form and function. We use a comparative corpus of conversations in four typologically distinct Australian Aboriginal languages (Garrwa, Gija, Jaru and Murrinhpatha) to illustrate how such an analysis may be developed. We focus on forms which have been described as ‘compassionate interjections’, which express that the speaker takes a compassionate affective stance towards something described in prior talk or evident in the situation. Despite differences in the morphological properties of these words in the languages we compare here, they display remarkable similarities in where they occur within conversational turns, and the functions they serve in different turn-related positions.","PeriodicalId":44988,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Linguistics","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07268602.2023.2244442","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Words classified as ‘interjections’ tend to be treated in descriptive grammars as outside of morphosyntax, too contextually bound to warrant a systematic description of their syntagmatic relations. In this paper we argue that if one takes grammar to include recurrent patterns in conversational turns that are routinely connected with particular interactional functions, such as assessments and acknowledgements, then the grammar of interjections can indeed be incorporated into language description in ways that show the systematic relationships between form and function. We use a comparative corpus of conversations in four typologically distinct Australian Aboriginal languages (Garrwa, Gija, Jaru and Murrinhpatha) to illustrate how such an analysis may be developed. We focus on forms which have been described as ‘compassionate interjections’, which express that the speaker takes a compassionate affective stance towards something described in prior talk or evident in the situation. Despite differences in the morphological properties of these words in the languages we compare here, they display remarkable similarities in where they occur within conversational turns, and the functions they serve in different turn-related positions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
走向感叹词的互动语法:用四种澳大利亚语言表达同情
在描述性语法中,被归类为“感叹词”的词往往被视为形态语法之外的词,过于依赖上下文而不能保证对它们的句法关系进行系统的描述。在本文中,我们认为,如果一个人把语法包括在会话中与特定交互功能(如评估和确认)通常相关的循环模式,那么感叹词语法确实可以以显示形式和功能之间系统关系的方式纳入语言描述。我们使用四种不同类型的澳大利亚土著语言(Garrwa, Gija, Jaru和Murrinhpatha)的对话比较语料库来说明如何进行这样的分析。我们关注的是被称为“同情感叹词”的形式,它表达了说话者对之前谈话中描述的或在情境中明显的事情采取同情的情感立场。尽管我们在这里比较的语言中这些词的形态特征有所不同,但它们在会话回合中出现的位置以及在不同回合相关位置上所起的作用都显示出惊人的相似性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊最新文献
Introduction: Language corpora in Australia The GeSCA repository: Gesture and Sign Corpus of Australia Building a searchable online corpus of Australian and New Zealand aligned speech The longitudinal corpus of language acquisition, maintenance and contact: Warlpiri & Light Warlpiri Analyzing online public discourse in Australia: Australian Twittersphere and NewsTalk corpora
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1