Do conspiracy theories circulating in the media or their debunking affect people’s trust in the media?

IF 1.9 4区 社会学 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1177/05390184231205174
Nicoleta Corbu, Alina Bârgăoanu, Georgiana Udrea, Mihai Gavrilescu
{"title":"Do conspiracy theories circulating in the media or their debunking affect people’s trust in the media?","authors":"Nicoleta Corbu, Alina Bârgăoanu, Georgiana Udrea, Mihai Gavrilescu","doi":"10.1177/05390184231205174","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic has fostered an unprecedented number of conspiracy theories about the virus and the vaccine against the disease. Current research has tried to make sense of the effects of conspiracy narratives and debunking them in both mainstream and social media. However, the effect of such narratives or their debunking on media trust has not been investigated to date. By means of a 2 × 2 experimental design (N = 945) in Romania, we investigate how mainstream and social media content containing conspiracy theories about vaccination against COVID-19 and debunking them influence people’s trust in both mainstream and social media. People’s own beliefs in such narratives are used as moderators of these effects. Findings show that only the debunking content circulating in mainstream media decreases people’s trust in both mainstream and social media, and only for people exhibiting high levels of belief in conspiracy theories, that is only when people are exposed to counter-attitudinal content. Implications for stakeholders are discussed.","PeriodicalId":47697,"journal":{"name":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","volume":"42 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Science Information Sur Les Sciences Sociales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/05390184231205174","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has fostered an unprecedented number of conspiracy theories about the virus and the vaccine against the disease. Current research has tried to make sense of the effects of conspiracy narratives and debunking them in both mainstream and social media. However, the effect of such narratives or their debunking on media trust has not been investigated to date. By means of a 2 × 2 experimental design (N = 945) in Romania, we investigate how mainstream and social media content containing conspiracy theories about vaccination against COVID-19 and debunking them influence people’s trust in both mainstream and social media. People’s own beliefs in such narratives are used as moderators of these effects. Findings show that only the debunking content circulating in mainstream media decreases people’s trust in both mainstream and social media, and only for people exhibiting high levels of belief in conspiracy theories, that is only when people are exposed to counter-attitudinal content. Implications for stakeholders are discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
媒体上流传的阴谋论或揭穿阴谋论会影响人们对媒体的信任吗?
COVID-19大流行催生了前所未有的关于该病毒和该疾病疫苗的阴谋论。目前的研究试图弄清楚阴谋叙事的影响,并在主流媒体和社交媒体上揭穿它们。然而,迄今为止,此类叙述或其揭穿对媒体信任的影响尚未得到调查。通过罗马尼亚的2 × 2实验设计(N = 945),我们调查了主流和社交媒体内容中包含的关于COVID-19疫苗接种的阴谋论以及揭穿这些阴谋论如何影响人们对主流和社交媒体的信任。人们自己对这种叙事的信念被用作这些影响的调节者。研究结果表明,只有在主流媒体上传播的揭穿内容才会降低人们对主流媒体和社交媒体的信任,而且只有在人们对阴谋论表现出高度信仰的情况下,也就是只有当人们接触到反态度的内容时。讨论了对利益相关者的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: Social Science Information is an international peer reviewed journal that publishes the highest quality original research in the social sciences at large with special focus on theoretical debates, methodology and comparative and (particularly) cross-cultural research.
期刊最新文献
Social science research: An analysis of BRICS countries Trust and distrust in science: Embedding the interplay among scientists, mass media and public in Italy during the SARS-Cov-2 outbreak The boundary contest that never was: Shadow banking and the relation between monetary system and financial system What is neoliberalism really? A global analysis of its real-world consequences for development, inequality, and democracy Capitalism, autocracy, distrust: Elements of a diagnosis of the present
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1