Assessment of ammonium fluoride as a mobile phase additive for sensitivity gains in electrospray ionization

IF 3 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL Analytical science advances Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1002/ansa.202300031
Jeremy Ryan McFadden, David Michael Ames
{"title":"Assessment of ammonium fluoride as a mobile phase additive for sensitivity gains in electrospray ionization","authors":"Jeremy Ryan McFadden,&nbsp;David Michael Ames","doi":"10.1002/ansa.202300031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Ammonium fluoride has been shown to improve sensitivity when using electrospray ionization (ESI) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). Recent internal investigation furthered that claim, through the observation of improved sensitivity when analyzing steroid molecules. This work focuses on extending those observations to other small molecules to understand the impact ammonium fluoride has on detection sensitivity with optimized instrument conditions. Using conventional liquid chromatography ESI-MS we investigated sensitivity differences between ammonium fluoride, formic acid, or ammonium hydroxide as mobile phase additives. Full source optimization was performed for nine compounds at three different organic concentrations (30%, 60%, or 90%) with formic acid, ammonium fluoride, and ammonium hydroxide adjustment. Optimization results were compiled to generate individual methods by compound, polarity, mobile phase, and organic concentration. Flow injection analysis was performed with fully optimized methods to compare compounds across different solvent systems under optimal conditions. Negative ESI data showed 2–22-fold sensitivity improvements for all compounds with ammonium fluoride. Positive ESI data showed &gt; 1–11-fold improvement in sensitivity for four of seven compounds and no change for three of seven compounds with ammonium fluoride. Ammonium fluoride improved ESI<sup>−</sup> sensitivity for all compounds studied when using optimized source conditions. Investigation with ESI<sup>+</sup> analyses showed mixed results, with four of seven compounds showing improvement and others showing equivalency or slight loss in sensitivity, suggesting potential sensitivity gains for some analogs with ESI<sup>+</sup>.</p>","PeriodicalId":93411,"journal":{"name":"Analytical science advances","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://chemistry-europe.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/ansa.202300031","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical science advances","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ansa.202300031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ammonium fluoride has been shown to improve sensitivity when using electrospray ionization (ESI) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). Recent internal investigation furthered that claim, through the observation of improved sensitivity when analyzing steroid molecules. This work focuses on extending those observations to other small molecules to understand the impact ammonium fluoride has on detection sensitivity with optimized instrument conditions. Using conventional liquid chromatography ESI-MS we investigated sensitivity differences between ammonium fluoride, formic acid, or ammonium hydroxide as mobile phase additives. Full source optimization was performed for nine compounds at three different organic concentrations (30%, 60%, or 90%) with formic acid, ammonium fluoride, and ammonium hydroxide adjustment. Optimization results were compiled to generate individual methods by compound, polarity, mobile phase, and organic concentration. Flow injection analysis was performed with fully optimized methods to compare compounds across different solvent systems under optimal conditions. Negative ESI data showed 2–22-fold sensitivity improvements for all compounds with ammonium fluoride. Positive ESI data showed > 1–11-fold improvement in sensitivity for four of seven compounds and no change for three of seven compounds with ammonium fluoride. Ammonium fluoride improved ESI sensitivity for all compounds studied when using optimized source conditions. Investigation with ESI+ analyses showed mixed results, with four of seven compounds showing improvement and others showing equivalency or slight loss in sensitivity, suggesting potential sensitivity gains for some analogs with ESI+.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估氟化铵作为流动相添加剂对提高电喷雾电离灵敏度的作用
在使用电喷雾离子化(ESI)与质谱联用技术(MS)时,氟化铵可提高灵敏度。最近的内部调查进一步证实了这一说法,观察到在分析类固醇分子时灵敏度有所提高。这项工作的重点是将这些观察结果扩展到其他小分子,以了解氟化铵在优化仪器条件下对检测灵敏度的影响。我们使用传统的液相色谱法 ESI-MS 研究了氟化铵、甲酸或氢氧化铵作为流动相添加剂时的灵敏度差异。在三种不同的有机物浓度(30%、60% 或 90%)条件下,对九种化合物进行了全源优化,并对甲酸、氟化铵和氢氧化铵进行了调整。优化结果经汇总后,按化合物、极性、流动相和有机物浓度生成了各种方法。使用完全优化的方法进行了流动注射分析,以比较不同溶剂系统在最佳条件下的化合物。负 ESI 数据显示,氟化铵对所有化合物的灵敏度都提高了 2-22 倍。正 ESI 数据显示,氟化铵使 7 种化合物中 4 种的灵敏度提高了 1-11 倍,7 种化合物中 3 种的灵敏度没有变化。在使用优化源条件时,氟化铵提高了所有研究化合物的 ESI- 灵敏度。对 ESI+ 分析的研究结果参差不齐,7 种化合物中有 4 种的灵敏度有所提高,其他化合物的灵敏度与之相当或略有下降,这表明某些类似物的灵敏度可能会因 ESI+ 而提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Emerging Scientists in Analytical Sciences: Zhuoheng Zhou Sensitive and Cost-Effective Tools in the Detection of Ovarian Cancer Biomarkers Preprocessing of spectroscopic data to highlight spectral features of materials Bioactive Potential of the Sulfated Exopolysaccharides From the Brown Microalga Halamphora sp.: Antioxidant, Antimicrobial, and Antiapoptotic Profiles Effect of orange fruit peel extract concentration on the synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1