Rh negativity seems to predispose to a milder COVID-19 course

Monika Paskudzka, Aleksandra Kumorek, Aleksandra Kijak, Marcin Śmiarowski, Dagmara Kogut, Milena Małecka-Giełdowska, Olga Ciepiela
{"title":"Rh negativity seems to predispose to a milder COVID-19 course","authors":"Monika Paskudzka, Aleksandra Kumorek, Aleksandra Kijak, Marcin Śmiarowski, Dagmara Kogut, Milena Małecka-Giełdowska, Olga Ciepiela","doi":"10.5603/mrj.96960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can lead to the development of COVID-19. Currently, more than 700 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with COVID-19, of which nearly 7 million have died from the severe course of the disease. Recent reports suggest that patients with blood group A are most at risk of developing COVID-19, and people with natural anti-A antibodies (especially those with blood type 0) have a milder course of the disease. This study aimed to assess the humoral response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 depending on the patient’s blood type. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 147 patients with confirmed previous COVID-19 (convalescents) and 147 individuals who declared no previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. All enrolled subjects were blood donors registered at Regional Blood Center. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was determined in the serum of the patients using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test. The blood group was determined by a manual method using anti-A, anti-B, and anti-D monoclonal sera and A, B, and 0 standard red blood cells (RBC). Results and conclusions: Based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 detection 68 people who denied contact with SARS-CoV-2 had previous asymptomatic infection. Blood type distribution differed between the asymptomatic convalescents and the declared convalescents, p = 0.0013. People with Arh–, BRh+, BRh–, and 0Rh– blood type were more often asymptomatically infected. Moreover, the Rh- subjects more often didn’t know about the previous infection than those with Rh+, p = 0.0012. It seems that subjects with Rh– blood type have a significantly milder course of disease than Rh+.","PeriodicalId":18485,"journal":{"name":"Medical Research Journal","volume":"44 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5603/mrj.96960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus can lead to the development of COVID-19. Currently, more than 700 million people worldwide have been diagnosed with COVID-19, of which nearly 7 million have died from the severe course of the disease. Recent reports suggest that patients with blood group A are most at risk of developing COVID-19, and people with natural anti-A antibodies (especially those with blood type 0) have a milder course of the disease. This study aimed to assess the humoral response to infection with SARS-CoV-2 depending on the patient’s blood type. Material and methods: The study group consisted of 147 patients with confirmed previous COVID-19 (convalescents) and 147 individuals who declared no previous infection with SARS-CoV-2. All enrolled subjects were blood donors registered at Regional Blood Center. The concentration of SARS-CoV-2 anti-nucleocapsid antibodies was determined in the serum of the patients using the Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2 test. The blood group was determined by a manual method using anti-A, anti-B, and anti-D monoclonal sera and A, B, and 0 standard red blood cells (RBC). Results and conclusions: Based on anti-SARS-CoV-2 detection 68 people who denied contact with SARS-CoV-2 had previous asymptomatic infection. Blood type distribution differed between the asymptomatic convalescents and the declared convalescents, p = 0.0013. People with Arh–, BRh+, BRh–, and 0Rh– blood type were more often asymptomatically infected. Moreover, the Rh- subjects more often didn’t know about the previous infection than those with Rh+, p = 0.0012. It seems that subjects with Rh– blood type have a significantly milder course of disease than Rh+.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Rh阴性似乎倾向于较温和的COVID-19病程
简介:感染SARS-CoV-2病毒可导致COVID-19的发展。目前,全世界有7亿多人被诊断患有COVID-19,其中近700万人死于该疾病的严重病程。最近的报告表明,A型血的患者患COVID-19的风险最高,而天然抗A抗体的人(特别是0型血的人)的病程较轻。本研究旨在评估根据患者血型对SARS-CoV-2感染的体液反应。材料和方法:研究组由147例既往确诊的COVID-19患者(恢复期)和147例既往未感染SARS-CoV-2的个体组成。所有受试者均为在地区血液中心登记的献血者。采用Elecsys Anti-SARS-CoV-2试验检测患者血清中SARS-CoV-2抗核衣壳抗体的浓度。用抗a、抗B、抗d单克隆血清和a、B、0标准红细胞(RBC)手工测定血型。结果与结论:经抗新冠病毒检测,68例否认接触过新冠病毒者既往无症状感染。无症状恢复者与宣告恢复者的血型分布差异,p = 0.0013。Arh -, BRh+, BRh -和0Rh -血型的人通常无症状感染。Rh-组对既往感染的不了解程度高于Rh+组,p = 0.0012。Rh -血型的受试者似乎比Rh+血型的患者病程要轻得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy initiation in maxillary sinus cancer patients Aftereffects of delayed intracavitary brachytherapy in cancer cervix patients during COVID-19 lockdown — a tertiary care centre review Influence on polymorphism of visfatin (rs 4730153) and nesfatin (rs 1330) genes on the development of the metabolic syndrome Optimal timing of postoperative radiotherapy initiation in maxillary sinus cancer patients Influence on polymorphism of visfatin (rs 4730153) and nesfatin (rs 1330) genes on the development of the metabolic syndrome
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1