Soil carbon stock and nutrient characteristics of forest–savanna transition: Estimates from four land use systems in Ghana

IF 2.3 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Environment Pub Date : 2023-10-12 DOI:10.1080/27658511.2023.2262684
Deborah Naa Akoto Dodoo, Philip Antwi-Agyei, Emmanuel Baidoo, Vincent Logah, Awudu Abubakari, Bright Oteng Adarkwa
{"title":"Soil carbon stock and nutrient characteristics of forest–savanna transition: Estimates from four land use systems in Ghana","authors":"Deborah Naa Akoto Dodoo, Philip Antwi-Agyei, Emmanuel Baidoo, Vincent Logah, Awudu Abubakari, Bright Oteng Adarkwa","doi":"10.1080/27658511.2023.2262684","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Land use change has led to drastic soil degradation and greenhouse gas emissions with implications for sustainable agriculture and climate change. Here, we report soil carbon stock and nutrient compositions of four land use types in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana. These were cashew, mango, oil palm and arable land. Soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths from each land use type. Soil nutrients and organic carbon content were greater in the tree-based land use types than in the arable land. Total soil organic carbon (SOC) ranged from 1.71% under cashew to 1.12% under the palms at the 0–15 cm depth. Soil carbon stock under the cashew was 12.5% greater than that of mango (56 Mg C/ha), and 40% more than that under oil palm. However, active carbon or permanganate oxidizable carbon was greatest (~130 mg/kg) under mango and least (~92.6 mg/kg) in arable land in the surface soil. Overall, active carbon was dependent on soil total carbon in the land use types (r = 0.81–0.91). Soil microbial biomass carbon was least in arable land (p < 0.05) and similar among the tree-based systems (p > 0.05) at 0–15 cm depth. No clear trend was observed in the exchangeable base compositions in the surface soils but cashew and mango systems appeared to show significantly greater levels of exchangeable calcium and magnesium, respectively. We conclude that strong nexus between soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus, and active soil carbon may drive soil carbon dynamics in land use systems of tropical forest-savanna ecotone.","PeriodicalId":29858,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Environment","volume":"113 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/27658511.2023.2262684","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Land use change has led to drastic soil degradation and greenhouse gas emissions with implications for sustainable agriculture and climate change. Here, we report soil carbon stock and nutrient compositions of four land use types in the forest-savanna transition agro-ecological zone of Ghana. These were cashew, mango, oil palm and arable land. Soil samples were collected at 0–15 cm and 15–30 cm depths from each land use type. Soil nutrients and organic carbon content were greater in the tree-based land use types than in the arable land. Total soil organic carbon (SOC) ranged from 1.71% under cashew to 1.12% under the palms at the 0–15 cm depth. Soil carbon stock under the cashew was 12.5% greater than that of mango (56 Mg C/ha), and 40% more than that under oil palm. However, active carbon or permanganate oxidizable carbon was greatest (~130 mg/kg) under mango and least (~92.6 mg/kg) in arable land in the surface soil. Overall, active carbon was dependent on soil total carbon in the land use types (r = 0.81–0.91). Soil microbial biomass carbon was least in arable land (p < 0.05) and similar among the tree-based systems (p > 0.05) at 0–15 cm depth. No clear trend was observed in the exchangeable base compositions in the surface soils but cashew and mango systems appeared to show significantly greater levels of exchangeable calcium and magnesium, respectively. We conclude that strong nexus between soil microbial biomass carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus, and active soil carbon may drive soil carbon dynamics in land use systems of tropical forest-savanna ecotone.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
森林-稀树草原过渡的土壤碳储量和养分特征:来自加纳四种土地利用系统的估算
土地利用变化导致严重的土壤退化和温室气体排放,对可持续农业和气候变化产生影响。在此,我们报告了加纳森林-稀树草原过渡农业生态区四种土地利用类型的土壤碳储量和养分组成。这些是腰果、芒果、油棕和可耕地。土壤样品采集深度分别为0 ~ 15 cm和15 ~ 30 cm。林地土壤养分和有机碳含量均高于耕地。0 ~ 15 cm土壤总有机碳(SOC)在腰果林下为1.71%,棕榈林下为1.12%。腰果土壤碳储量比芒果(56 Mg C/ hm2)高12.5%,比油棕高40%。表层土壤中活性碳或高锰酸盐可氧化碳在芒果地最多(~130 mg/kg),在耕地中最少(~92.6 mg/kg)。总体而言,不同土地利用类型的土壤活性碳依赖于土壤全碳(r = 0.81 ~ 0.91)。土壤微生物生物量碳以耕地最少(p < 0.05),在0 ~ 15 cm深度,乔木系统与耕地相似(p > 0.05)。表层土壤交换性碱组成没有明显的变化趋势,但腰果和芒果系统的交换性钙和镁含量明显高于其他土壤。研究认为,土壤微生物量碳、氮、磷和土壤活性碳之间的密切联系可能驱动热带森林-热带草原交换带土地利用系统土壤碳动态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Environment
Sustainable Environment ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.30%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Exploring loss and damage from climate change and global perspectives that influence response mechanism in vulnerable communities Exploring knowledge, attitudes and practices of farmers at the edge of Budongo forest on agrochemicals usage Pesticides in use, their application and risks on human health and ecosystems: A case of Fogera District, Ethiopia Hidden hazards in urban soils: A meta-analysis review of global heavy metal contamination (2010-2022), sources and its Ecological and health consequences Do innovation, financial development and institutional quality matter in managing carbon risk?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1