Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Boon or Bane – A Single Centre Retrospective Observational Study from India

Darpanarayan Hazra, Gina Maryann Chandy, Amit Ghosh
{"title":"Subthalamic Deep Brain Stimulation in Parkinson's Disease: A Boon or Bane – A Single Centre Retrospective Observational Study from India","authors":"Darpanarayan Hazra, Gina Maryann Chandy, Amit Ghosh","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771318","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) is more of a modality of treatment that is empirical, for which a physiological explanation is being sought. This study was done to determine the outcome and complications of patients undergoing STN-DBS for PD. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in an advanced neuromedicine facility in eastern India for 9 years (August 2013–August 2022), which included all patients undergoing STN-DBS. Results A total of 53 patients were operated on during the study period. The mean age group of the study population was 60.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 8.2) years with a male (33 [62.3%]) predominance. The most common presenting complaints included rigidity and hypokinesia (27), severe dyskinesia (21), and tremors (17). During the postoperative period, rigidity and hypokinesia (21), severe dyskinesia (16), and tremors (12) improved significantly in a subset of the patients. The majority (45 [84.9%]) of these cases received bilateral monopolar simulation, whereas three patients (5.7%) had bilateral bipolar stimulation. Unilateral bipolar stimulation was used in five (9.4%) patients. In the immediate postoperative period, they were initiated on limb, speech, and swallowing therapy as indicated. Surgery-related complications were seen in five (9.4%) cases. At 6 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in the Unified PD rating scale component (mainly motor examination and complication of PD therapy) was noted in the majority (36 [67.9%]) of patients. One patient developed neuroleptic malignant syndrome and succumbed to his illness on the fourth postoperative day. Conclusion Given these findings, STN-DBS appears to be a good, safe, and effective treatment for a subset of medically refractory PD with an overall improvement in two-thirds of the study cohort and less than 10% risk of complications.","PeriodicalId":94300,"journal":{"name":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","volume":"47 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771318","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Subthalamic deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) for refractory Parkinson's disease (PD) is more of a modality of treatment that is empirical, for which a physiological explanation is being sought. This study was done to determine the outcome and complications of patients undergoing STN-DBS for PD. Methods This retrospective observational cohort study was conducted in an advanced neuromedicine facility in eastern India for 9 years (August 2013–August 2022), which included all patients undergoing STN-DBS. Results A total of 53 patients were operated on during the study period. The mean age group of the study population was 60.5 (standard deviation [SD]: 8.2) years with a male (33 [62.3%]) predominance. The most common presenting complaints included rigidity and hypokinesia (27), severe dyskinesia (21), and tremors (17). During the postoperative period, rigidity and hypokinesia (21), severe dyskinesia (16), and tremors (12) improved significantly in a subset of the patients. The majority (45 [84.9%]) of these cases received bilateral monopolar simulation, whereas three patients (5.7%) had bilateral bipolar stimulation. Unilateral bipolar stimulation was used in five (9.4%) patients. In the immediate postoperative period, they were initiated on limb, speech, and swallowing therapy as indicated. Surgery-related complications were seen in five (9.4%) cases. At 6 months of follow-up, a significant improvement in the Unified PD rating scale component (mainly motor examination and complication of PD therapy) was noted in the majority (36 [67.9%]) of patients. One patient developed neuroleptic malignant syndrome and succumbed to his illness on the fourth postoperative day. Conclusion Given these findings, STN-DBS appears to be a good, safe, and effective treatment for a subset of medically refractory PD with an overall improvement in two-thirds of the study cohort and less than 10% risk of complications.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
丘脑下深部脑刺激治疗帕金森病:是利还是弊——一项来自印度的单中心回顾性观察研究
背景丘脑底深部脑刺激(STN-DBS)治疗难治性帕金森病(PD)更多的是一种经经验的治疗方式,其生理学解释正在寻求中。本研究旨在确定接受STN-DBS治疗PD患者的预后和并发症。方法本回顾性观察队列研究于2013年8月至2022年8月在印度东部一家先进的神经医学机构进行,为期9年,包括所有接受STN-DBS的患者。结果研究期间共手术53例。研究人群的平均年龄为60.5岁(标准差[SD]: 8.2)岁,以男性(33岁[62.3%])为主。最常见的主诉包括僵硬和运动障碍(27例),严重运动障碍(21例)和震颤(17例)。在术后期间,部分患者的僵硬和运动障碍(21例)、严重运动障碍(16例)和震颤(12例)显著改善。这些病例中大多数(45例[84.9%])接受双侧单极模拟,而3例(5.7%)接受双侧双极刺激。5例(9.4%)患者采用单侧双相刺激。术后立即开始肢体、言语和吞咽治疗。手术相关并发症5例(9.4%)。在随访6个月时,大多数患者(36例[67.9%])在统一PD评定量表(主要是运动检查和PD治疗并发症)方面有显著改善。1例患者出现抗精神病药恶性综合征,术后第4天病逝。鉴于这些发现,STN-DBS似乎是一种良好、安全、有效的治疗难治性帕金森病的方法,三分之二的研究队列总体改善,并发症风险低于10%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Traumatic Middle Meningeal Artery Aneurysm: A Rare Cause of Recurrent Acute Epidural Hematoma. A Case Report. Case Report and Literature Review: A Severe Case of Blast-Related Traumatic Brain Injury. Management of Compound Depressed Fractures over Venous Sinuses. The Impact of the Pandemic of COVID-19 on the Head Injury Fast-Track System and Surgical Outcome. The Role of Helmet Therapy in Craniosynostosis: A Systematic Review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1