Mid-Term Survivorship, Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

IF 0.8 Q4 SURGERY Surgical technology international Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.52198/23.sti.42.os1660
Martin W. Roche, Tsun Yee Law, Rushabh M Vakharia, Kevin L. Mekkawy, Hugo C. Rodriguez
{"title":"Mid-Term Survivorship, Radiographic and Functional Outcomes of Robotic-Assisted Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty","authors":"Martin W. Roche, Tsun Yee Law, Rushabh M Vakharia, Kevin L. Mekkawy, Hugo C. Rodriguez","doi":"10.52198/23.sti.42.os1660","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The use of robotic-arm assistance for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) has become an area of interest to overcome technical challenges, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes. Due to the rise in osteoarthritis (OA) and robotic assistance, well-powered long-term studies are warranted. The aim of this study was to analyze midterm survivorship, radiographic changes, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) of RAUKA. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent RAUKA for medial compartmental OA were identified from April 2009 to May 2014. The query yielded 162 knees with a mean follow up of 6.5 years. Primary endpoints were to compare survivorship, final mechanical axis alignment, radiographic changes, mean ROM, and changes to the following PROMs: Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no revisions of the primary implant, one case required exchange of polyethylene bearing and debridement for deep infection, and five cases required additional surgical intervention with implant retention. Overall survivorship was 100%. Radiographic assessment demonstrated no mechanical loosening or osteolysis surrounding the implant. Mean ROM was 3 to 121.9º. Patients demonstrated a mean functional KSS of 78.55, IKDC of 78.22, and OKS of 43.94. Conclusions: The study supports excellent mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA. Longer term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of this technology for patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA.","PeriodicalId":22194,"journal":{"name":"Surgical technology international","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical technology international","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52198/23.sti.42.os1660","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The use of robotic-arm assistance for medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (RAUKA) has become an area of interest to overcome technical challenges, improve accuracy, and optimize patient outcomes. Due to the rise in osteoarthritis (OA) and robotic assistance, well-powered long-term studies are warranted. The aim of this study was to analyze midterm survivorship, radiographic changes, range of motion (ROM), and patient-reported outcome measurements (PROMs) of RAUKA. Materials and Methods: Patients who underwent RAUKA for medial compartmental OA were identified from April 2009 to May 2014. The query yielded 162 knees with a mean follow up of 6.5 years. Primary endpoints were to compare survivorship, final mechanical axis alignment, radiographic changes, mean ROM, and changes to the following PROMs: Knee Society Score (KSS), International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Statistical analyses were primarily descriptive. A p-value less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Results: There were no revisions of the primary implant, one case required exchange of polyethylene bearing and debridement for deep infection, and five cases required additional surgical intervention with implant retention. Overall survivorship was 100%. Radiographic assessment demonstrated no mechanical loosening or osteolysis surrounding the implant. Mean ROM was 3 to 121.9º. Patients demonstrated a mean functional KSS of 78.55, IKDC of 78.22, and OKS of 43.94. Conclusions: The study supports excellent mid-term outcomes in patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA. Longer term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the efficacy of this technology for patients undergoing RAUKA for medial compartment OA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
机器人辅助单室膝关节置换术的中期生存率、影像学和功能预后
导语:机械臂辅助内侧单室膝关节置换术(RAUKA)的使用已经成为克服技术挑战、提高准确性和优化患者预后的一个感兴趣的领域。由于骨关节炎(OA)和机器人辅助的增加,有必要进行有力的长期研究。本研究的目的是分析RAUKA的中期生存率、影像学改变、活动范围(ROM)和患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)。材料与方法:2009年4月至2014年5月,对内侧隔室性骨关节炎患者行RAUKA。研究人员对162人进行了调查,平均随访时间为6.5年。主要终点是比较生存率、最终机械轴对中、放射学变化、平均ROM和以下指标的变化:膝关节社会评分(KSS)、国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)和牛津膝关节评分(OKS)。统计分析主要是描述性的。p值小于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:没有对初级种植体进行修改,1例需要交换聚乙烯轴承并清除深部感染,5例需要额外的手术干预并保留种植体。总生存率为100%。x线评估显示植入物周围无机械松动或骨溶解。平均ROM为3 ~ 121.9º。患者的平均功能性KSS为78.55,IKDC为78.22,OKS为43.94。结论:该研究支持内侧室骨关节炎患者接受RAUKA治疗的中期预后良好。需要长期的随访研究来确定该技术对内侧室骨关节炎患者进行RAUKA的疗效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
141
期刊最新文献
Robotic Assisted Lapendoscopic Single-Site Surgery for Ileal Deep Endometriosis. A Case Report and Review of Literature. Robotic versus Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomised Trials. Cardiophrenic Lymph Node Resection Through Abdominal Subxiphoid Approach: Surgical Technique. What Happens to Endometriosis During the Menstrual Cycle? Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty is Associated with Thinner and Less Constrained Polyethylene Inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1