{"title":"Power quality assessment in different wind power plant models considering wind turbine wake effects","authors":"Mohsen Khatamiaghda, Saeed Bahraminejad, Roohollah Fadaeinedjad","doi":"10.1093/ce/zkad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The intense increase in the installed capacity of wind farms has required a computationally efficient dynamic equivalent model of wind farms. Various types of wind-farm modelling aim to identify the accuracy and simulation time in the presence of the power system. In this study, dynamic simulation of equivalent models of a sample wind farm, including single-turbine representation, multiple-turbine representation, quasi-multiple-turbine representation and full-turbine representation models, are performed using a doubly-fed induction generator wind turbine model developed in DIgSILENT software. The developed doubly-fed induction generator model in DIgSILENT is intended to simulate inflow wind turbulence for more accurate performance. The wake effects between wind turbines for the full-turbine representation and multiple-turbine representation models have been considered using the Jensen method. The developed model improves the extraction power of the turbine according to the layout of the wind farm. The accuracy of the mentioned methods is evaluated by calculating the output parameters of the wind farm, including active and reactive powers, voltage and instantaneous flicker intensity. The study was carried out on a sample wind farm, which included 39 wind turbines. The simulation results confirm that the computational loads of the single-turbine representation (STR), the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple-turbine representation are 1/39, 1/8 and 1/8 times the full-turbine representation model, respectively. On the other hand, the error of active power (voltage) with respect to the full-turbine representation model is 74.59% (1.31%), 43.29% (0.31%) and 7.19% (0.11%) for the STR, the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple representation, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36703,"journal":{"name":"Clean Energy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkad033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract The intense increase in the installed capacity of wind farms has required a computationally efficient dynamic equivalent model of wind farms. Various types of wind-farm modelling aim to identify the accuracy and simulation time in the presence of the power system. In this study, dynamic simulation of equivalent models of a sample wind farm, including single-turbine representation, multiple-turbine representation, quasi-multiple-turbine representation and full-turbine representation models, are performed using a doubly-fed induction generator wind turbine model developed in DIgSILENT software. The developed doubly-fed induction generator model in DIgSILENT is intended to simulate inflow wind turbulence for more accurate performance. The wake effects between wind turbines for the full-turbine representation and multiple-turbine representation models have been considered using the Jensen method. The developed model improves the extraction power of the turbine according to the layout of the wind farm. The accuracy of the mentioned methods is evaluated by calculating the output parameters of the wind farm, including active and reactive powers, voltage and instantaneous flicker intensity. The study was carried out on a sample wind farm, which included 39 wind turbines. The simulation results confirm that the computational loads of the single-turbine representation (STR), the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple-turbine representation are 1/39, 1/8 and 1/8 times the full-turbine representation model, respectively. On the other hand, the error of active power (voltage) with respect to the full-turbine representation model is 74.59% (1.31%), 43.29% (0.31%) and 7.19% (0.11%) for the STR, the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple representation, respectively.