Power quality assessment in different wind power plant models considering wind turbine wake effects

IF 2.9 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENERGY & FUELS Clean Energy Pub Date : 2023-08-01 DOI:10.1093/ce/zkad033
Mohsen Khatamiaghda, Saeed Bahraminejad, Roohollah Fadaeinedjad
{"title":"Power quality assessment in different wind power plant models considering wind turbine wake effects","authors":"Mohsen Khatamiaghda, Saeed Bahraminejad, Roohollah Fadaeinedjad","doi":"10.1093/ce/zkad033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The intense increase in the installed capacity of wind farms has required a computationally efficient dynamic equivalent model of wind farms. Various types of wind-farm modelling aim to identify the accuracy and simulation time in the presence of the power system. In this study, dynamic simulation of equivalent models of a sample wind farm, including single-turbine representation, multiple-turbine representation, quasi-multiple-turbine representation and full-turbine representation models, are performed using a doubly-fed induction generator wind turbine model developed in DIgSILENT software. The developed doubly-fed induction generator model in DIgSILENT is intended to simulate inflow wind turbulence for more accurate performance. The wake effects between wind turbines for the full-turbine representation and multiple-turbine representation models have been considered using the Jensen method. The developed model improves the extraction power of the turbine according to the layout of the wind farm. The accuracy of the mentioned methods is evaluated by calculating the output parameters of the wind farm, including active and reactive powers, voltage and instantaneous flicker intensity. The study was carried out on a sample wind farm, which included 39 wind turbines. The simulation results confirm that the computational loads of the single-turbine representation (STR), the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple-turbine representation are 1/39, 1/8 and 1/8 times the full-turbine representation model, respectively. On the other hand, the error of active power (voltage) with respect to the full-turbine representation model is 74.59% (1.31%), 43.29% (0.31%) and 7.19% (0.11%) for the STR, the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple representation, respectively.","PeriodicalId":36703,"journal":{"name":"Clean Energy","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clean Energy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ce/zkad033","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract The intense increase in the installed capacity of wind farms has required a computationally efficient dynamic equivalent model of wind farms. Various types of wind-farm modelling aim to identify the accuracy and simulation time in the presence of the power system. In this study, dynamic simulation of equivalent models of a sample wind farm, including single-turbine representation, multiple-turbine representation, quasi-multiple-turbine representation and full-turbine representation models, are performed using a doubly-fed induction generator wind turbine model developed in DIgSILENT software. The developed doubly-fed induction generator model in DIgSILENT is intended to simulate inflow wind turbulence for more accurate performance. The wake effects between wind turbines for the full-turbine representation and multiple-turbine representation models have been considered using the Jensen method. The developed model improves the extraction power of the turbine according to the layout of the wind farm. The accuracy of the mentioned methods is evaluated by calculating the output parameters of the wind farm, including active and reactive powers, voltage and instantaneous flicker intensity. The study was carried out on a sample wind farm, which included 39 wind turbines. The simulation results confirm that the computational loads of the single-turbine representation (STR), the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple-turbine representation are 1/39, 1/8 and 1/8 times the full-turbine representation model, respectively. On the other hand, the error of active power (voltage) with respect to the full-turbine representation model is 74.59% (1.31%), 43.29% (0.31%) and 7.19% (0.11%) for the STR, the multiple-turbine representation and the quasi-multiple representation, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
考虑尾流效应的不同风电场模型的电能质量评价
摘要随着风电场装机容量的急剧增加,需要一种计算效率高的风电场动态等效模型。各种类型的风电场建模旨在确定在电力系统存在的情况下的精度和仿真时间。本研究利用DIgSILENT软件开发的双馈感应发电机风力机模型,对某样例风电场的等效模型进行了动态仿真,包括单机表示、多机表示、准多机表示和全机表示模型。DIgSILENT中开发的双馈感应发电机模型旨在模拟入流风湍流,以获得更准确的性能。采用Jensen方法考虑了全机表示和多机表示模型中风力机之间的尾迹效应。该模型根据风电场的布局,提高了风机的抽油功率。通过计算风电场的输出参数,包括有功功率、无功功率、电压和瞬时闪变强度,对上述方法的准确性进行了评价。这项研究是在一个风电场样本上进行的,其中包括39个风力涡轮机。仿真结果表明,单涡轮表示、多涡轮表示和准多涡轮表示的计算负荷分别是全涡轮表示模型的1/39、1/8和1/8。另一方面,STR、多机表示和准多机表示的有功功率(电压)相对于全机表示模型的误差分别为74.59%(1.31%)、43.29%(0.31%)和7.19%(0.11%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clean Energy
Clean Energy Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Exploring commercial water electrolyser systems: a data-based analysis of product characteristics A hybrid machine-learning model for solar irradiance forecasting An application of a genetic algorithm in co-optimization of geological CO2 storage based on artificial neural networks Optimal design of hybrid renewable-energy microgrid system: a techno–economic–environment–social–reliability perspective A hybrid solar–biogas system for post-COVID-19 rural energy access
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1