Acute responses to repeated sprints on a non-motorized treadmill on dominant- and non-dominant leg sprint parameters

IF 0.8 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Physical Education of Students Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.15561/20755279.2023.0502
Mehmet Kale, Kerim Aktürkoğlu, Yeliz Yol, Esen Kizildag Kale
{"title":"Acute responses to repeated sprints on a non-motorized treadmill on dominant- and non-dominant leg sprint parameters","authors":"Mehmet Kale, Kerim Aktürkoğlu, Yeliz Yol, Esen Kizildag Kale","doi":"10.15561/20755279.2023.0502","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background and Study Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the acute responses to repeated sprints on a non-motorized treadmill on dominant leg (DL) and non-dominant leg (NDL) sprint parameters. Material and Methods. Volunteered students from Sports Sciences Faculty were randomly divided into experimental group (EG) and control group (CG). As pre- and post-tests, each participant performed 30m sprint test on a non-motorized treadmill. There were 6x20m with 1min on a non-motorized treadmill as repetitive sprints. As a statistical analysis, whether there is pre-test and post-test differences were analysed with independent t test between the groups and paired t test within the groups. The level of significance was taken as p≤0.05. Results. In comparisons within the groups, both groups had significant pre- and post-test differences in parameters of time (t), velocity (V), and power (P) [for EG, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001; for CG, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.01, respectively]. CG had significant pre- and post-test differences in parameters of stride length (SL) and horizontal force (HF) (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant pre-test differences in 30m sprint parameters of NDL and DL. In post-tests, there were only significant differences in SLDL, HFDL, PNDL, and PDL (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, and p<0.01, respectively). CG had only significant pre- and post-test differences in SLNDL and SLDL within the group’s comparisons (p<0.05). Either EG or CG had significant pre- and post-test differences in PDL (p<0.05). Conclusions. In conclusion, repeated sprints may exhibit shorter strides to overcome horizontal resistance and fatigue, resulting in reduced SL and greater P exerted in the DL.","PeriodicalId":51897,"journal":{"name":"Physical Education of Students","volume":"149 ","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Education of Students","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15561/20755279.2023.0502","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and Study Aim. The aim of this study was to examine the acute responses to repeated sprints on a non-motorized treadmill on dominant leg (DL) and non-dominant leg (NDL) sprint parameters. Material and Methods. Volunteered students from Sports Sciences Faculty were randomly divided into experimental group (EG) and control group (CG). As pre- and post-tests, each participant performed 30m sprint test on a non-motorized treadmill. There were 6x20m with 1min on a non-motorized treadmill as repetitive sprints. As a statistical analysis, whether there is pre-test and post-test differences were analysed with independent t test between the groups and paired t test within the groups. The level of significance was taken as p≤0.05. Results. In comparisons within the groups, both groups had significant pre- and post-test differences in parameters of time (t), velocity (V), and power (P) [for EG, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.001; for CG, p<0.001, p<0.001, and p<0.01, respectively]. CG had significant pre- and post-test differences in parameters of stride length (SL) and horizontal force (HF) (p<0.05). There were no statistically significant pre-test differences in 30m sprint parameters of NDL and DL. In post-tests, there were only significant differences in SLDL, HFDL, PNDL, and PDL (p<0.05, p<0.05, p<0.05, and p<0.01, respectively). CG had only significant pre- and post-test differences in SLNDL and SLDL within the group’s comparisons (p<0.05). Either EG or CG had significant pre- and post-test differences in PDL (p<0.05). Conclusions. In conclusion, repeated sprints may exhibit shorter strides to overcome horizontal resistance and fatigue, resulting in reduced SL and greater P exerted in the DL.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在非机动跑步机上对优势腿和非优势腿冲刺参数重复冲刺的急性反应
背景与研究目的。本研究的目的是检查在非电动跑步机上对优势腿(DL)和非优势腿(NDL)冲刺参数重复冲刺的急性反应。材料和方法。将体育科学学院的志愿者随机分为实验组(EG)和对照组(CG)。作为前后测试,每个参与者在非电动跑步机上进行30米短跑测试。在非电动跑步机上进行6 × 20米1分钟的重复冲刺。作为统计分析,采用组间独立t检验和组内配对t检验分析检验前、检验后是否存在差异。p≤0.05为显著性水平。结果。在组内比较中,两组在时间(t)、速度(V)和功率(P)参数的测试前和测试后差异显著[EG, p<0.001, p<0.001和p<0.001;对于CG,分别为p<0.001, p<0.001和p<0.01]。CG在步长(SL)和水平力(HF)参数测试前后差异有统计学意义(p<0.05)。NDL和DL的30m冲刺参数测前差异无统计学意义。后验中,SLDL、HFDL、PNDL、PDL差异有统计学意义(分别为p<0.05、p<0.05、p<0.05、p<0.01)。在组内比较,CG组在SLNDL和SLDL测试前和测试后只有显著差异(p<0.05)。EG和CG在PDL测试前和测试后均有显著差异(p < 0.05)。结论。总之,重复冲刺可以表现出较短的步幅,以克服水平阻力和疲劳,从而减少左下肢的动压,增加左下肢的动压。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Education of Students
Physical Education of Students EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
University students’ physical features- reasons, consequences, solutions Remote versus onsite proctored exams: comparing students’ results in physical fitness testing Acute effects of repeated isoinertial lunges on jump and sprint parameters Sensory integration research: priority scientific directions based on the analysis of Web of Science Core Collection resources 3D kinematic analysis of salto backward in acrobatic rock and roll: a case study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1