Comparison between Two Competing Newton-Type High Convergence Order Schemes for Equations on Banach Spaces

Ioannis K. Argyros, Manoj K. Singh, Samundra Regmi
{"title":"Comparison between Two Competing Newton-Type High Convergence Order Schemes for Equations on Banach Spaces","authors":"Ioannis K. Argyros, Manoj K. Singh, Samundra Regmi","doi":"10.3390/foundations3040039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We carried out a local comparison between two ninth convergence order schemes for solving nonlinear equations, relying on first-order Fréchet derivatives. Earlier investigations require the existence as well as the boundedness of derivatives of a high order to prove the convergence of these schemes. However, these derivatives are not in the schemes. These assumptions restrict the applicability of the schemes, which may converge. Numerical results along with a boundary value problem are given to examine the theoretical results. Both schemes are symmetrical not only in the theoretical results (formation and convergence order), but the numerical and dynamical results are also similar. We calculated the convergence radii of the nonlinear schemes. Moreover, we obtained the extraneous fixed points for the proposed schemes, which are repulsive and are not part of the solution space. Lastly, the theoretical and numerical results are supported by the dynamic results, where we plotted basins of attraction for a selected test function.","PeriodicalId":81291,"journal":{"name":"Foundations","volume":"147 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Foundations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/foundations3040039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We carried out a local comparison between two ninth convergence order schemes for solving nonlinear equations, relying on first-order Fréchet derivatives. Earlier investigations require the existence as well as the boundedness of derivatives of a high order to prove the convergence of these schemes. However, these derivatives are not in the schemes. These assumptions restrict the applicability of the schemes, which may converge. Numerical results along with a boundary value problem are given to examine the theoretical results. Both schemes are symmetrical not only in the theoretical results (formation and convergence order), but the numerical and dynamical results are also similar. We calculated the convergence radii of the nonlinear schemes. Moreover, we obtained the extraneous fixed points for the proposed schemes, which are repulsive and are not part of the solution space. Lastly, the theoretical and numerical results are supported by the dynamic results, where we plotted basins of attraction for a selected test function.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Banach空间上两种竞争牛顿型高收敛阶方程格式的比较
我们对求解非线性方程的两种九阶收敛格式进行了局部比较,这些格式依赖于一阶fracimchet导数。先前的研究要求高阶导数的存在性和有界性来证明这些格式的收敛性。然而,这些衍生品并不在计划之内。这些假设限制了方案的适用性,这些方案可能会收敛。数值结果和边值问题验证了理论结果。两种方案不仅在理论结果(形成和收敛顺序)上是对称的,而且在数值和动力学结果上也是相似的。我们计算了非线性格式的收敛半径。此外,我们还得到了这些方案的不动点,这些不动点是相互排斥的,不属于解空间。最后,理论和数值结果得到了动态结果的支持,其中我们为选定的测试函数绘制了吸引力盆地。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Generalized Quasilinearization Method for Caputo Fractional Differential Equations with Initial Conditions with Applications Effects of Colored Noise in the Dynamic Motions and Conformational Exploration of Enzymes On the Algebraic Geometry of Multiview Characterization of the Solution Properties of Sodium Dodecylsulphate Containing Alkaline–Surfactant–Polymer Flooding Media Classifying Sets of Type (4,n) in PG(3,q)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1