Surgical treatment of aortic root abscess: 10-year single center experience

S. T. Enginoev, A. A. Zenkov, G. M. Magomedov, U. K. Abdulmejidova, M. A. Guliyev, I. I. Chernov, E. Yu. Gubareva
{"title":"Surgical treatment of aortic root abscess: 10-year single center experience","authors":"S. T. Enginoev, A. A. Zenkov, G. M. Magomedov, U. K. Abdulmejidova, M. A. Guliyev, I. I. Chernov, E. Yu. Gubareva","doi":"10.15829/1560-4071-20235453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of optimal surgical scope in patients with aortic root abscess due to infective endocarditis remains open, since there are different strategies and interventional methods. In addition, the guidelines do not give preference to any particular type of surgical intervention and recommend an individual approach to each situation. The study included 25 patients with aortic root abscess due to aortic valve infective endocarditis. The most frequently performed surgical intervention in patients was the Ross procedure (n=12, 48%). Eight (32%) patients of the center underwent aortic homograft root replacement. Combined surgery was performed in 7 (28%) patients as follows: 3 (12%) patients — interventions on the mitral valve (all patients underwent mitral valve repair due to mitral valve involvement in abscess), 3 (12%) — coronary artery bypass grafting, 1 (4%) — ascending aortic replacement due to dilatation. Five- and ten-year survival after surgical treatment of patients with aortic root abscess was 86,9% and 78,6%, respectively. There was no reintervention and recurrence of infective endocarditis in the long-term period.","PeriodicalId":21389,"journal":{"name":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian Journal of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15829/1560-4071-20235453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The issue of optimal surgical scope in patients with aortic root abscess due to infective endocarditis remains open, since there are different strategies and interventional methods. In addition, the guidelines do not give preference to any particular type of surgical intervention and recommend an individual approach to each situation. The study included 25 patients with aortic root abscess due to aortic valve infective endocarditis. The most frequently performed surgical intervention in patients was the Ross procedure (n=12, 48%). Eight (32%) patients of the center underwent aortic homograft root replacement. Combined surgery was performed in 7 (28%) patients as follows: 3 (12%) patients — interventions on the mitral valve (all patients underwent mitral valve repair due to mitral valve involvement in abscess), 3 (12%) — coronary artery bypass grafting, 1 (4%) — ascending aortic replacement due to dilatation. Five- and ten-year survival after surgical treatment of patients with aortic root abscess was 86,9% and 78,6%, respectively. There was no reintervention and recurrence of infective endocarditis in the long-term period.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
主动脉根部脓肿的外科治疗:10年单中心经验
感染性心内膜炎所致主动脉根部脓肿的最佳手术范围,由于治疗策略和介入方法的不同,仍然是一个悬而未决的问题。此外,指南没有给予任何特定类型的手术干预的优先权,并建议针对每种情况采取单独的方法。本研究纳入25例主动脉瓣感染性心内膜炎所致主动脉根部脓肿患者。患者中最常见的手术干预是Ross手术(n=12, 48%)。本中心8例(32%)患者行同种主动脉移植物根置换。7例(28%)患者行联合手术:3例(12%)患者-二尖瓣干预(所有患者因二尖瓣累及脓肿而行二尖瓣修复),3例(12%)-冠状动脉旁路移植术,1例(4%)-扩张引起的升主动脉置换术。主动脉根部脓肿手术治疗后5年和10年生存率分别为86.9%和78.6%。长期无再干预及感染性心内膜炎复发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Russian Journal of Cardiology
Russian Journal of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Russian Journal of Cardiology has been issued since 1996. The language of this publication is Russian, with tables of contents and abstracts of all articles presented in English as well. Editor-in-Chief: Prof. Eugene V.Shlyakhto, President of the Russian Society of Cardiology. The aim of the journal is both scientific and practical, also with referring to organizing matters of the Society. The best of all cardiologic research in Russia is submitted to the Journal. Moreover, it contains useful tips and clinical examples for practicing cardiologists. Journal is peer-reviewed, with multi-stage editing. The editorial board is presented by the leading cardiologists from different cities of Russia.
期刊最新文献
Mature neutrophils as a marker of hypoechoic carotid plaques and a predictor of polyvascular disease progression Oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in the treatment of non-valvular atrial fibrillation in patients with stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease Myocardial infarction in persons aged ≥75 years: factors influencing inhospital mortality Comparative analysis of two multitask approaches to cognitive training in cardiac surgery patients Use of antiplatelet agents in patients after myocardial infarction followed up in Moscow outpatient clinics. Results of a non-interventional prospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1