Antimicrobial Prophylaxis in Lymphoma by Chemotherapy Regimen

Abstract

Treatment of lymphomas involves a wide variety of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted-agents tailored to disease biology and patient characteristics. Each of these regimens carry their own risk of opportunistic infections in an immunocompromised population. In addition to the treatment associated immunosuppression, lymphoma itself is immunosuppressive. Lymphoma associated immunosuppression is secondary to increased production of abnormal lymphocytes resulting in decreased production of normally functioning lymphocytes. Additionally, lymphoma cells induce both humoral and cellular immunosuppression through effects on numerous cytokines, T-cells, myeloid-derived suppressor cells, and macrophages. Clinical trials, patient co-morbidities, and institutional preferences all play a role in determining the preferred antimicrobial prophylaxis. While there is a paucity of data on systematic reviews and guidelines for standardized chemotherapy regimens in lymphoma patients, the efficacy and recommendations for antimicrobial prophylaxis in specific chemotherapy regimens for lymphoma has not been fully reviewed. According to the National Comprehensive Cancer Network, lymphoma is generally regarded as an ‘intermediate risk’ cancer with regards to overall infection risk. This results in discordance between research data and clinical practice. This is reiterated in the SIGNIFICANT trial which reported that while guidelines previously advised against fluoroquinolone prophylaxis in lymphoma and solid cancers, a survey of 3,600 physicians revealed that 45% routinely used fluoroquinolone prophylaxis despite these recommendations. This review article analyzes numerous research studies with summarization of findings and antimicrobial prophylaxis recommendations based on specific lymphoma chemotherapy regimens. With regards to each specific chemotherapy regimen assessed, indications for antibacterial, anti-viral, anti-fungal, and Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia (PJP) prophylaxis were determined for each regimen. The degree of immunosuppression and the necessary prophylaxis varies across different regimens and lymphoma subgroups; and thus, an individualized approach is necessary to optimize the supportive care during lymphoma treatment.