Factors that influence the selection of conservative management for end stage renal disease – a systematic review

NDT Plus Pub Date : 2023-10-17 DOI:10.1093/ckj/sfad269
Pavithra Sakthivel, Alyaa Mostafa, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi
{"title":"Factors that influence the selection of conservative management for end stage renal disease – a systematic review","authors":"Pavithra Sakthivel, Alyaa Mostafa, Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi","doi":"10.1093/ckj/sfad269","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Background Most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are managed with dialysis and less commonly kidney transplantation. However, not all are suitable for or desire either of these renal replacement therapies. Conservative management (CM) is an option. However, the selection of CM is often not easy for patients and clinicians. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the key factors that influence the selection of CM for ESRD. Methods Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL Plus were systematically searched from inception to September 10, 2021. Titles/abstracts and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Reference lists of included articles were searched. An update search via PubMed was conducted on August 10, 2023. A narrative synthesis of review findings was conducted. Results At the end of the screening process, 15 qualitative and 8 survey articles were selected. Reference checking yielded no additional relevant studies. Main themes were: (i) Patient-specific factors; (ii) Clinician-specific factors; (iii) Organisational factors; and (iv) National and international factors. Patient-specific factors were awareness and perceptions of CM and dialysis, beliefs about survival, preferred treatment outcomes and influence of family/caregivers and clinicians. Clinician-specific factors included perceptions of CM as ‘non-intervention’, perceptions of clinician role in the decision-making process, and confidence and ability to initiate sensitive treatment discussions. Relationships with and involvement of other healthcare professionals, time constraints, and limited clinical guidance were also important factors. Conclusions An improvement in the provision of education regarding CM for patients, caregivers, and clinicians is essential. Robust studies are required to generate crucial evidence for the development of stronger recommendations and guidance for clinicians.","PeriodicalId":18987,"journal":{"name":"NDT Plus","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NDT Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/ckj/sfad269","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Background Most patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) are managed with dialysis and less commonly kidney transplantation. However, not all are suitable for or desire either of these renal replacement therapies. Conservative management (CM) is an option. However, the selection of CM is often not easy for patients and clinicians. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the key factors that influence the selection of CM for ESRD. Methods Medline, Embase, PsychINFO, and CINAHL Plus were systematically searched from inception to September 10, 2021. Titles/abstracts and full texts were independently screened by two reviewers. Reference lists of included articles were searched. An update search via PubMed was conducted on August 10, 2023. A narrative synthesis of review findings was conducted. Results At the end of the screening process, 15 qualitative and 8 survey articles were selected. Reference checking yielded no additional relevant studies. Main themes were: (i) Patient-specific factors; (ii) Clinician-specific factors; (iii) Organisational factors; and (iv) National and international factors. Patient-specific factors were awareness and perceptions of CM and dialysis, beliefs about survival, preferred treatment outcomes and influence of family/caregivers and clinicians. Clinician-specific factors included perceptions of CM as ‘non-intervention’, perceptions of clinician role in the decision-making process, and confidence and ability to initiate sensitive treatment discussions. Relationships with and involvement of other healthcare professionals, time constraints, and limited clinical guidance were also important factors. Conclusions An improvement in the provision of education regarding CM for patients, caregivers, and clinicians is essential. Robust studies are required to generate crucial evidence for the development of stronger recommendations and guidance for clinicians.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响终末期肾脏疾病保守治疗选择的因素综述
大多数终末期肾病(ESRD)患者采用透析治疗,较少采用肾移植。然而,并不是所有人都适合或渴望这些肾脏替代疗法。保守管理(CM)是一种选择。然而,对于患者和临床医生来说,CM的选择往往并不容易。本系统综述的目的是确定影响ESRD选择CM的关键因素。方法系统检索Medline、Embase、PsychINFO和CINAHL Plus自成立至2021年9月10日。题目/摘要和全文由两位审稿人独立筛选。检索纳入文献的参考文献列表。通过PubMed进行的更新搜索于2023年8月10日进行。对审查结果进行了叙述综合。结果筛选过程结束时,共筛选出15篇定性文章和8篇调查文章。参考资料核查未发现其他相关研究。主要主题是:(i)病人特有因素;临床特定因素;组织因素;(四)国内和国际因素。患者特异性因素包括对CM和透析的认识和认知、对生存的信念、首选治疗结果以及家庭/护理人员和临床医生的影响。临床特异性因素包括对CM“非干预”的认知,对临床医生在决策过程中的作用的认知,以及发起敏感治疗讨论的信心和能力。与其他医疗保健专业人员的关系和参与、时间限制和有限的临床指导也是重要因素。结论:改善对患者、护理人员和临床医生的CM教育至关重要。需要进行强有力的研究,为临床医生制定更有力的建议和指导提供关键证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Sleep apnea syndrome prevalence in chronic kidney disease and end stage kidney disease patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis Mechanisms and treatment of Obesity-Related Hypertension: Part 1. Mechanisms Twenty years of the French Renal Epidemiology and Information Network Replacing a kidney biopsy by exome sequencing in undetermined kidney diseases – not yet ready for prime time! Kidney and urine cell transcriptomics in IgA nephropathy and lupus nephritis: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1