Dominic A. Trevisan, Sherab Tsheringla, James C. McPartland
{"title":"On the relation between interoceptive attention and health anxiety: Distinguishing adaptive and maladaptive bodily awareness","authors":"Dominic A. Trevisan, Sherab Tsheringla, James C. McPartland","doi":"10.1080/23311908.2023.2262855","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were to (1) demonstrate differences in the most common measures of interoceptive attention based on correlations with theoretically relevant emotional constructs, and (2) explore the interoceptive mechanisms contributing to health anxiety. Participants were 327 adults from the general population who completed a series of questionnaires on an online survey tool called Qualtrics. Associations among variables were ana-lyzed using simple correlations and a hierarchical multiple regression. The two most common measures of interoceptive attention were statistically unrelated to each other and had opposite patterns of relationships with measures of worry, health anxiety, and alexithymia. Results from a regression analysis suggest that an interoceptive profile of “high interoceptive attention” and “low interoceptive accuracy” is most predictive of health anxiety. Results suggest that there are “adaptive” and “maladaptive” forms of interoceptive attention that are captured by different measures of interoceptive attention. Researchers should choose measures of interoceptive attention carefully based on their own unique research needs. Findings about the interoceptive correlates of health anxiety may have implications for treatment of illness anxiety disorder.","PeriodicalId":46323,"journal":{"name":"Cogent Psychology","volume":"278 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cogent Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23311908.2023.2262855","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to (1) demonstrate differences in the most common measures of interoceptive attention based on correlations with theoretically relevant emotional constructs, and (2) explore the interoceptive mechanisms contributing to health anxiety. Participants were 327 adults from the general population who completed a series of questionnaires on an online survey tool called Qualtrics. Associations among variables were ana-lyzed using simple correlations and a hierarchical multiple regression. The two most common measures of interoceptive attention were statistically unrelated to each other and had opposite patterns of relationships with measures of worry, health anxiety, and alexithymia. Results from a regression analysis suggest that an interoceptive profile of “high interoceptive attention” and “low interoceptive accuracy” is most predictive of health anxiety. Results suggest that there are “adaptive” and “maladaptive” forms of interoceptive attention that are captured by different measures of interoceptive attention. Researchers should choose measures of interoceptive attention carefully based on their own unique research needs. Findings about the interoceptive correlates of health anxiety may have implications for treatment of illness anxiety disorder.
期刊介绍:
One of the largest multidisciplinary open access journals serving the psychology community, Cogent Psychology provides a home for scientifically sound peer-reviewed research. Part of Taylor & Francis / Routledge, the journal provides authors with fast peer review and publication and, through open access publishing, endeavours to help authors share their knowledge with the world. Cogent Psychology particularly encourages interdisciplinary studies and also accepts replication studies and negative results. Cogent Psychology covers a broad range of topics and welcomes submissions in all areas of psychology, ranging from social psychology to neuroscience, and everything in between. Led by Editor-in-Chief Professor Peter Walla of Webster Private University, Austria, and supported by an expert editorial team from institutions across the globe, Cogent Psychology provides our authors with comprehensive and quality peer review. Rather than accepting manuscripts based on their level of importance or impact, editors assess manuscripts objectively, accepting valid, scientific research with sound rigorous methodology. Article-level metrics let the research speak for itself.