“We have to improve our culture about this”: Family planning decision-making among women and men living in Florence, Italy

Alyssa Amidei, Taylor Raff, Andrea L. DeMaria
{"title":"“We have to improve our culture about this”: Family planning decision-making among women and men living in Florence, Italy","authors":"Alyssa Amidei, Taylor Raff, Andrea L. DeMaria","doi":"10.4148/2572-1836.1196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The male condom is the most widely used family planning method in Italy and Southern Europe. Most family planning research is focused on women and, therefore, could be missing significant gender differences in behavior, as male partners play a critical role in decision-making and pregnancy prevention. This study aimed to explore attitudes toward contraceptive methods, including decision-making and desired improvements related to family planning in Italy. Semi- structured interviews with 42 men and women aged 18–50 years (29.1±7.9) living in or near Florence, Italy, were conducted between May and June 2019. Techniques from thematic analysis allowed for a constant comparative approach to contextualize data and identify emergent themes. HyperRESEARCH assisted in data management and analysis. Data resulted in three emerging themes: (1) Family planning decision-making dynamics; (2) Outside sources that influence family planning decision-making; and (3) Desired improvements to family planning. Participants engaged in most forms of family planning methods; however, participants also had knowledge gaps and misinformation about hormonal contraceptive methods' efficacy and long-term health effects. Participants clarified that family, general doctors, and other important persons (i.e., intimate partners) were the primary source of information about family planning methods. Findings offer practical recommendations to guide social marketing and behavior change interventions to increase family planning access among women and men in Italy. Improved messaging strategies could address concerns and knowledge gaps, improving family planning decision-making among couples.","PeriodicalId":73205,"journal":{"name":"Health behavior research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health behavior research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4148/2572-1836.1196","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The male condom is the most widely used family planning method in Italy and Southern Europe. Most family planning research is focused on women and, therefore, could be missing significant gender differences in behavior, as male partners play a critical role in decision-making and pregnancy prevention. This study aimed to explore attitudes toward contraceptive methods, including decision-making and desired improvements related to family planning in Italy. Semi- structured interviews with 42 men and women aged 18–50 years (29.1±7.9) living in or near Florence, Italy, were conducted between May and June 2019. Techniques from thematic analysis allowed for a constant comparative approach to contextualize data and identify emergent themes. HyperRESEARCH assisted in data management and analysis. Data resulted in three emerging themes: (1) Family planning decision-making dynamics; (2) Outside sources that influence family planning decision-making; and (3) Desired improvements to family planning. Participants engaged in most forms of family planning methods; however, participants also had knowledge gaps and misinformation about hormonal contraceptive methods' efficacy and long-term health effects. Participants clarified that family, general doctors, and other important persons (i.e., intimate partners) were the primary source of information about family planning methods. Findings offer practical recommendations to guide social marketing and behavior change interventions to increase family planning access among women and men in Italy. Improved messaging strategies could address concerns and knowledge gaps, improving family planning decision-making among couples.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
“我们必须改善我们的文化”:生活在意大利佛罗伦萨的女性和男性的计划生育决策
在意大利和南欧,男用避孕套是最广泛使用的计划生育方法。大多数计划生育研究都集中在女性身上,因此可能会忽略行为上的重大性别差异,因为男性伴侣在决策和预防怀孕方面发挥着关键作用。本研究旨在探讨对避孕方法的态度,包括决策和期望改进有关计划生育在意大利。研究人员在2019年5月至6月期间对42名年龄在18-50岁(29.1±7.9)之间居住在意大利佛罗伦萨或其附近的男性和女性进行了半结构化访谈。主题分析的技术允许采用持续的比较方法来将数据置于背景中并确定紧急主题。HyperRESEARCH协助进行数据管理和分析。数据产生了三个新主题:(1)计划生育决策动态;(二)影响计划生育决策的外部来源;(三)提高计划生育水平的意愿。参与大多数形式的计划生育方法;然而,参与者在激素避孕方法的功效和长期健康影响方面也存在知识空白和错误信息。与会者澄清说,家庭、普通医生和其他重要人士(即亲密伴侣)是关于计划生育方法的主要信息来源。研究结果为指导社会营销和行为改变干预措施提供了实用建议,以增加意大利女性和男性的计划生育机会。改进的信息传递策略可以解决人们的担忧和知识差距,改善夫妇之间的计划生育决策。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
The American Academy of Health Behavior 2024 Annual Scientific Meeting: "Health Communication, (Mis-)Information, and Behavior: Leveraging Technology for Behavioral Interventions and Health Behavior Research" Sapere Aude — Dare to Be Wise: Robert J. McDermott Examining the Relationship between Health Literacy and Preventive Care Use A Longitudinal Examination of Multiple Forms of Stigma on Minority Stress, Belongingness, and Problematic Alcohol Use Associations of essential worker status, sex, lifestyle behaviors, and moods: Findings from a sample of working adults in the United States during the early stages of the COVID-19 pandemic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1