Comparison of cancer stem cell enrichment between spheroids derived from single-cell and multicellular aggregate cultures

IF 0.6 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL Biomedical Research and Therapy Pub Date : 2023-08-31 DOI:10.15419/bmrat.v10i8.823
Omar Nafiis Hairuddin, Badrul Hisham Yahaya, Mohamad Johari Ibahim, Abhi Verakumarasivam, Chan Soon Choy, Musalmah Mazlan, Nurhidayah Ab. Rahim, Syarifah Masyitah Habib Dzulkarnain, Siti Farizan Mansor
{"title":"Comparison of cancer stem cell enrichment between spheroids derived from single-cell and multicellular aggregate cultures","authors":"Omar Nafiis Hairuddin, Badrul Hisham Yahaya, Mohamad Johari Ibahim, Abhi Verakumarasivam, Chan Soon Choy, Musalmah Mazlan, Nurhidayah Ab. Rahim, Syarifah Masyitah Habib Dzulkarnain, Siti Farizan Mansor","doi":"10.15419/bmrat.v10i8.823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a distinct group of cells within cancerous tissue that possess the ability to initiate tumorigenesis and exhibit potency, self-renewal, and drug resistance. The study of CSCs often encounters challenges in obtaining these cells of interest or generating a sufficient quantity for downstream analysis. Nevertheless, it is feasible to enrich CSCs in vitro by subjecting them to conditions that stimulate their CSC properties, such as prolonged exposure to drugs or radiation, or by promoting their self-renewal capability through spheroid culture. Spheroids are a specific type of cell culture that organizes cells into a three-dimensional structure, closely mimicking the in vivo environment. These spheroids consist of a heterogeneous cell population, including CSCs or tumor-propagating cells responsible for tumor growth and maintenance. In our study, we cultured spheroids derived from single cells as well as multicellular aggregates to enrich CSCs based on their self-renewal capability and the structural organization provided by the three-dimensional context. Methods: Comparing the spheroid cultures with the parental adherent monolayer cells, we observed higher expression of CSC markers, pluripotent genes, and adipogenic differentiation in both multicellular spheroids (MCS) and single cell-derived spheroids (SCDS) of the two tested cell lines. Results: The spheroids exhibited progressive growth in size throughout the culture period. When comparing the two methods, SCDS demonstrated greater expression of surface markers and all three pluripotent genes associated with CSCs. Furthermore, when assessing drug resistance potential and the expression of the ABCG2 drug efflux gene, only 5637 SCDS displayed increased resistance to cisplatin and upregulation of ABCG2. Conclusion: In conclusion, both the MCS and SCDS methods effectively enriched the population of bladder CSCs in the 5637 and HT-1376 bladder cancer cell lines. However, the SCDS method demonstrated a higher upregulation of CSC markers and pluripotent gene expression compared to MCS. It is worth noting that spheroid culture and CSC enrichment are not mutually exclusive and can coexist with increased chemotherapy resistance and upregulation of ABCG2 drug efflux gene expression. Moreover, the drug efflux capability may vary depending on the specific cell line and clonal lineage. These strategies can serve as valuable models for CSC enrichment, the study of cancer cell behavior, disease modeling, and personalized chemotherapy investigations.","PeriodicalId":8870,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical Research and Therapy","volume":"63 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15419/bmrat.v10i8.823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Cancer stem cells (CSCs) represent a distinct group of cells within cancerous tissue that possess the ability to initiate tumorigenesis and exhibit potency, self-renewal, and drug resistance. The study of CSCs often encounters challenges in obtaining these cells of interest or generating a sufficient quantity for downstream analysis. Nevertheless, it is feasible to enrich CSCs in vitro by subjecting them to conditions that stimulate their CSC properties, such as prolonged exposure to drugs or radiation, or by promoting their self-renewal capability through spheroid culture. Spheroids are a specific type of cell culture that organizes cells into a three-dimensional structure, closely mimicking the in vivo environment. These spheroids consist of a heterogeneous cell population, including CSCs or tumor-propagating cells responsible for tumor growth and maintenance. In our study, we cultured spheroids derived from single cells as well as multicellular aggregates to enrich CSCs based on their self-renewal capability and the structural organization provided by the three-dimensional context. Methods: Comparing the spheroid cultures with the parental adherent monolayer cells, we observed higher expression of CSC markers, pluripotent genes, and adipogenic differentiation in both multicellular spheroids (MCS) and single cell-derived spheroids (SCDS) of the two tested cell lines. Results: The spheroids exhibited progressive growth in size throughout the culture period. When comparing the two methods, SCDS demonstrated greater expression of surface markers and all three pluripotent genes associated with CSCs. Furthermore, when assessing drug resistance potential and the expression of the ABCG2 drug efflux gene, only 5637 SCDS displayed increased resistance to cisplatin and upregulation of ABCG2. Conclusion: In conclusion, both the MCS and SCDS methods effectively enriched the population of bladder CSCs in the 5637 and HT-1376 bladder cancer cell lines. However, the SCDS method demonstrated a higher upregulation of CSC markers and pluripotent gene expression compared to MCS. It is worth noting that spheroid culture and CSC enrichment are not mutually exclusive and can coexist with increased chemotherapy resistance and upregulation of ABCG2 drug efflux gene expression. Moreover, the drug efflux capability may vary depending on the specific cell line and clonal lineage. These strategies can serve as valuable models for CSC enrichment, the study of cancer cell behavior, disease modeling, and personalized chemotherapy investigations.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
单细胞和多细胞聚集培养的球状肿瘤干细胞富集的比较
简介:癌症干细胞(CSCs)是癌组织中一组独特的细胞,具有启动肿瘤发生的能力,并表现出效力、自我更新和耐药性。CSCs的研究在获得这些感兴趣的细胞或产生足够数量的下游分析方面经常遇到挑战。然而,体外富集CSC是可行的,方法是将其置于刺激其CSC特性的条件下,如长时间暴露于药物或辐射中,或通过球体培养促进其自我更新能力。球状体是一种特殊类型的细胞培养,它将细胞组织成三维结构,密切模仿体内环境。这些球体由异质细胞群组成,包括csc或负责肿瘤生长和维持的肿瘤增殖细胞。在我们的研究中,我们培养了来自单细胞和多细胞聚集体的球体,以丰富CSCs的自我更新能力和三维环境提供的结构组织。方法:将球体培养物与亲本贴壁单层细胞进行比较,观察到两种被试细胞系在多细胞球体(MCS)和单细胞衍生球体(SCDS)中CSC标记物、多能基因和脂肪分化的表达均较高。结果:在整个培养过程中,球体呈渐进式增长。当比较两种方法时,SCDS显示出更多的表面标记和与CSCs相关的所有三种多能性基因的表达。此外,在评估耐药潜力和ABCG2药物外排基因表达时,只有5637 SCDS对顺铂的耐药增加和ABCG2上调。结论:MCS和SCDS方法均能有效富集5637和HT-1376膀胱癌细胞系膀胱CSCs。然而,与MCS相比,SCDS方法显示出更高的CSC标记和多能基因表达上调。值得注意的是,球体培养和CSC富集并不相互排斥,可以与化疗耐药增加和ABCG2药物外排基因表达上调共存。此外,药物外排能力可能取决于特定的细胞系和克隆谱系。这些策略可以作为CSC富集、癌细胞行为研究、疾病建模和个性化化疗研究的有价值模型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical Research and Therapy
Biomedical Research and Therapy MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
自引率
11.10%
发文量
55
期刊最新文献
Characteristics and Outcomes of Pediatric Ovarian Germ Cell Tumors: A Report of 162 Cases Statin-associated new-onset diabetes mellitus and insulin resistance: a 30-year bibliometric study (1992-2022) Remarkable and Prolonged Response to Melphalan and High-Dose Dexamethasone Combined Therapy of a Patient with Light-Chain Cardiac Amyloidosis Association Between Anisometropia and Amblyopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study Teucrium montanum extract drives effector and memory differentiation of CD8+ T cells
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1