Insights into outreach: the research potential of online focus groups

Neil Raven
{"title":"Insights into outreach: the research potential of online focus groups","authors":"Neil Raven","doi":"10.5456/wpll.25.1.51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Focus groups have become an established research instrument amongst those involved in widening participation (WP). However, COVID-19 presents a challenge to their use. The very strength of this method of data collection ‐ the opportunity to listen to those from WP backgrounds ‐ has been limited by the restricted access that outreach practitioners and researchers have had to schools and colleges since early 2020. Yet, the imperative of hearing from these students remains. Evidence suggests that the pandemic has had the most severe impact on those from the least advantaged backgrounds. Moreover, there is a need to establish the effectiveness of the outreach response, much of which has involved new modes of delivery. Online focus groups constitute a possible option. Whilst their potential has been recognised for a number of years, few studies have explored their use in the field. In seeking to offer insights, this article draws on the findings from two research projects that deployed online focus groups. Whilst various technical issues were encountered, the practical advantages they offered were evident in both studies, as was their capacity to generate highquality data. In recognising the contribution that online focus groups can make to the evidence base, this article concludes with some recommendations for their use.","PeriodicalId":90763,"journal":{"name":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","volume":"73 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Widening participation and lifelong learning : the journal of the Institute for Access Studies and the European Access Network","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5456/wpll.25.1.51","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Focus groups have become an established research instrument amongst those involved in widening participation (WP). However, COVID-19 presents a challenge to their use. The very strength of this method of data collection ‐ the opportunity to listen to those from WP backgrounds ‐ has been limited by the restricted access that outreach practitioners and researchers have had to schools and colleges since early 2020. Yet, the imperative of hearing from these students remains. Evidence suggests that the pandemic has had the most severe impact on those from the least advantaged backgrounds. Moreover, there is a need to establish the effectiveness of the outreach response, much of which has involved new modes of delivery. Online focus groups constitute a possible option. Whilst their potential has been recognised for a number of years, few studies have explored their use in the field. In seeking to offer insights, this article draws on the findings from two research projects that deployed online focus groups. Whilst various technical issues were encountered, the practical advantages they offered were evident in both studies, as was their capacity to generate highquality data. In recognising the contribution that online focus groups can make to the evidence base, this article concludes with some recommendations for their use.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
洞察外展:在线焦点小组的研究潜力
焦点小组已成为参与扩大参与(WP)的人员的既定研究工具。然而,2019冠状病毒病对它们的使用提出了挑战。这种数据收集方法的优势——有机会听取来自WP背景的人的意见——受到了限制,因为自2020年初以来,外展从业者和研究人员对学校和大学的访问受到限制。然而,听取这些学生的意见仍然是当务之急。有证据表明,疫情对最弱势群体的影响最为严重。此外,有必要确定外联反应的有效性,其中许多都涉及新的提供方式。在线焦点小组是一个可能的选择。虽然多年来人们已经认识到它们的潜力,但很少有研究探索它们在该领域的应用。为了提供一些见解,本文借鉴了两个研究项目的发现,这些研究项目部署了在线焦点小组。虽然遇到了各种技术问题,但在这两项研究中,它们提供的实际优势是显而易见的,它们产生高质量数据的能力也是如此。在认识到在线焦点小组对证据基础的贡献后,本文最后提出了一些使用它们的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher education policies for applicants with criminal records in the United Kingdom: Are universities ‘banning the box’? Scientist encounters: Igniting parental aspirations to support young scientists ‐ a pilot study Editorial – general edition A typology of social equity discourses and its contribution to a wicked problem Can role models help encourage young people to apply to (selective) universities? Evidence from a large-scale English field experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1