Identifying Influential Brokers on Social Media from Social Network Structure

Sho Tsugawa, Kohei Watabe
{"title":"Identifying Influential Brokers on Social Media from Social Network Structure","authors":"Sho Tsugawa, Kohei Watabe","doi":"10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying influencers in a given social network has become an important research problem for various applications, including accelerating the spread of information in viral marketing and preventing the spread of fake news and rumors. The literature contains a rich body of studies on identifying influential source spreaders who can spread their own messages to many other nodes. In contrast, the identification of influential brokers who can spread other nodes' messages to many nodes has not been fully explored. Theoretical and empirical studies suggest that involvement of both influential source spreaders and brokers is a key to facilitating large-scale information diffusion cascades. Therefore, this paper explores ways to identify influential brokers from a given social network. By using three social media datasets, we investigate the characteristics of influential brokers by comparing them with influential source spreaders and central nodes obtained from centrality measures. Our results show that (i) most of the influential source spreaders are not influential brokers (and vice versa) and (ii) the overlap between central nodes and influential brokers is small (less than 15%) in Twitter datasets. We also tackle the problem of identifying influential brokers from centrality measures and node embeddings, and we examine the effectiveness of social network features in the broker identification task. Our results show that (iii) although a single centrality measure cannot characterize influential brokers well, prediction models using node embedding features achieve F1 scores of 0.35--0.68, suggesting the effectiveness of social network features for identifying influential brokers.","PeriodicalId":338112,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","volume":"5 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v17i1.22193","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Identifying influencers in a given social network has become an important research problem for various applications, including accelerating the spread of information in viral marketing and preventing the spread of fake news and rumors. The literature contains a rich body of studies on identifying influential source spreaders who can spread their own messages to many other nodes. In contrast, the identification of influential brokers who can spread other nodes' messages to many nodes has not been fully explored. Theoretical and empirical studies suggest that involvement of both influential source spreaders and brokers is a key to facilitating large-scale information diffusion cascades. Therefore, this paper explores ways to identify influential brokers from a given social network. By using three social media datasets, we investigate the characteristics of influential brokers by comparing them with influential source spreaders and central nodes obtained from centrality measures. Our results show that (i) most of the influential source spreaders are not influential brokers (and vice versa) and (ii) the overlap between central nodes and influential brokers is small (less than 15%) in Twitter datasets. We also tackle the problem of identifying influential brokers from centrality measures and node embeddings, and we examine the effectiveness of social network features in the broker identification task. Our results show that (iii) although a single centrality measure cannot characterize influential brokers well, prediction models using node embedding features achieve F1 scores of 0.35--0.68, suggesting the effectiveness of social network features for identifying influential brokers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从社交网络结构看社交媒体上有影响力的经纪人
识别特定社交网络中的影响者已经成为各种应用的重要研究问题,包括加速病毒式营销中的信息传播,防止假新闻和谣言的传播。文献中包含了大量关于识别有影响力的源传播者的研究,这些传播者可以将自己的信息传播到许多其他节点。相比之下,识别能够将其他节点的消息传播给许多节点的有影响力的代理还没有得到充分的探索。理论和实证研究表明,有影响力的源传播者和中间商的参与是促进大规模信息扩散级联的关键。因此,本文探讨了从给定的社会网络中识别有影响力的经纪人的方法。通过使用三个社交媒体数据集,我们将有影响力的经纪人与有影响力的源传播者和由中心性度量获得的中心节点进行比较,研究了有影响力的经纪人的特征。我们的结果表明(i)大多数有影响力的源传播者不是有影响力的经纪人(反之亦然),(ii)在Twitter数据集中,中心节点和有影响力的经纪人之间的重叠很小(小于15%)。我们还解决了从中心性度量和节点嵌入中识别有影响力的经纪人的问题,并研究了社交网络特征在经纪人识别任务中的有效性。我们的研究结果表明:(iii)尽管单个中心性度量不能很好地表征有影响力的经纪人,但使用节点嵌入特征的预测模型的F1得分为0.35—0.68,表明社会网络特征在识别有影响力的经纪人方面是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Statement of Removal AnnoBERT: Effectively Representing Multiple Annotators’ Label Choices to Improve Hate Speech Detection Just Another Day on Twitter: A Complete 24 Hours of Twitter Data #RoeOverturned: Twitter Dataset on the Abortion Rights Controversy SexWEs: Domain-Aware Word Embeddings via Cross-Lingual Semantic Specialisation for Chinese Sexism Detection in Social Media
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1