Medical and technical aspects of using intraocular lenses with extended depth of field

M. E. Konovalov, A. V. Morenko
{"title":"Medical and technical aspects of using intraocular lenses with extended depth of field","authors":"M. E. Konovalov, A. V. Morenko","doi":"10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-3-159-164","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: to analyse the medical and technical aspects of intraocular lenses (IOLs) with extended depth of field (EDOF). Literature analysis was performed in the PubMed international database, the search keywords being “IOL with extended depth of field” (EDOF), “Optical Bench Evaluation of IOL”, “Preclinical evaluation of IOL”, “Aberrations”, “Monofocal IOL” (MOFIOL), “Multifocal IOLs” (MUFIOL). A total of 226 sources were analyzed, further using systematic review filters and the authors' knowledge of the topic. The duration of the retrospective analysis was 7 years (2016–2022), some of the considered work dates back to 2023. Unlike MUFIOL, EDOF lenses create a single elongated focal point to increase the depth of field, rather than several foci. Thus, EDOFs are aimed at reducing light phenomena, glare and halos, the occurrence of which is characteristic of MUFIOL. A potential disadvantage of EDOF is the reduction in retinal image quality with an excessive increase in the number of aberrations. The factors of the medical and technical assessment of the IOL indicate a high correlation with the predicted visual acuity (VA). EDOFs, whose design features are based on a higher order aspherical design, provide comparable optical quality for the far and extended intermediate ranges, while producing halo effects comparable to those of MOFIOL. Designed to improve depth of field with a full correction of corneal spherical aberration, EDOF provides intermediate-level pupil-independent improvement in VA and maintains visual acuity unlike conventional MOFIOLs. The quality of visual perception and the predicted VA of various types of EDOFs depend on the optical technology and the correction of corneal spherical aberrations. EDOFs can be expected to provide adequate vision at an intermediate distance (with a possibility of insufficient near vision). At the same time, the expansion of the depth of field varies between models, which should be taken into account when preoperatively choosing EDOF for a specific type of daily visual activity of the patient, especially for people with visually strenuous work. The results of the medical and technical assessment are widely used in the clinical testing of specific types of EDOF IOLs.","PeriodicalId":36080,"journal":{"name":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","volume":"148 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rossiiskii Oftal''mologicheskii Zhurnal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21516/2072-0076-2023-16-3-159-164","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: to analyse the medical and technical aspects of intraocular lenses (IOLs) with extended depth of field (EDOF). Literature analysis was performed in the PubMed international database, the search keywords being “IOL with extended depth of field” (EDOF), “Optical Bench Evaluation of IOL”, “Preclinical evaluation of IOL”, “Aberrations”, “Monofocal IOL” (MOFIOL), “Multifocal IOLs” (MUFIOL). A total of 226 sources were analyzed, further using systematic review filters and the authors' knowledge of the topic. The duration of the retrospective analysis was 7 years (2016–2022), some of the considered work dates back to 2023. Unlike MUFIOL, EDOF lenses create a single elongated focal point to increase the depth of field, rather than several foci. Thus, EDOFs are aimed at reducing light phenomena, glare and halos, the occurrence of which is characteristic of MUFIOL. A potential disadvantage of EDOF is the reduction in retinal image quality with an excessive increase in the number of aberrations. The factors of the medical and technical assessment of the IOL indicate a high correlation with the predicted visual acuity (VA). EDOFs, whose design features are based on a higher order aspherical design, provide comparable optical quality for the far and extended intermediate ranges, while producing halo effects comparable to those of MOFIOL. Designed to improve depth of field with a full correction of corneal spherical aberration, EDOF provides intermediate-level pupil-independent improvement in VA and maintains visual acuity unlike conventional MOFIOLs. The quality of visual perception and the predicted VA of various types of EDOFs depend on the optical technology and the correction of corneal spherical aberrations. EDOFs can be expected to provide adequate vision at an intermediate distance (with a possibility of insufficient near vision). At the same time, the expansion of the depth of field varies between models, which should be taken into account when preoperatively choosing EDOF for a specific type of daily visual activity of the patient, especially for people with visually strenuous work. The results of the medical and technical assessment are widely used in the clinical testing of specific types of EDOF IOLs.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用大景深人工晶状体的医学和技术方面
目的:分析大景深人工晶状体(iol)的医学和技术问题。在PubMed国际数据库中进行文献分析,检索关键词为“扩展景深IOL”(EDOF)、“光学台架评价IOL”、“临床前评价IOL”、“像差”、“单焦点IOL”(MOFIOL)、“多焦点IOL”(MUFIOL)。共分析了226个来源,并进一步使用系统评价过滤器和作者对该主题的了解。回顾性分析的持续时间为7年(2016-2022年),其中一些被考虑的工作可以追溯到2023年。与MUFIOL不同,EDOF镜头创建一个细长的焦点来增加景深,而不是几个焦点。因此,edof旨在减少光现象,眩光和光晕,这是MUFIOL的特征。EDOF的一个潜在的缺点是视网膜图像质量的降低与过度增加的数量像差。人工晶状体的医学和技术评价因素与预测视力(VA)高度相关。EDOFs,其设计特点是基于高阶非球面设计,提供相当的远和扩展的中间范围的光学质量,同时产生光晕效果可媲美那些MOFIOL。EDOF的设计目的是通过完全矫正角膜球差来改善景深,与传统mofiol不同,EDOF提供了中等水平的不依赖瞳孔的VA改善,并保持了视力。不同类型EDOFs的视觉感知质量和预估视差取决于光学技术和角膜球差的校正。edof可以在中距离提供足够的视力(有可能近距视力不足)。同时,不同模型的景深扩展不同,在术前为患者的特定类型的日常视觉活动选择EDOF时应考虑到这一点,特别是对于视觉工作繁重的人。医学和技术评估的结果被广泛应用于特定类型的EDOF人工晶体的临床检测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Telemedicine for glaucoma: the state-of-the-art and trends of development Modifying treatment of degenerative retinal diseases. Part 2. Conditioning therapy techniques and the problem of maximizing retinal plasticity Ocular proton therapy: state-of-the-art Methodological aspects of statistical analysis in ophthalmology Keratoprostheses: from the past to the future
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1