Comparison of immune response to various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines within 6 months after starting vaccination and following revaccination

Irina V. Astrakhantseva
{"title":"Comparison of immune response to various SARS-CoV-2 vaccines within 6 months after starting vaccination and following revaccination","authors":"Irina V. Astrakhantseva","doi":"10.46235/1028-7221-13943-coi","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The pandemic of coronavirus infection (COVID-19) has stimulated the development, testing and widespread use of preventive vaccines based on various platforms. Our aim was to perform a direct comparison of immunogenicity of various vaccines within a single study in small groups within six months of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and revaccination.
 The stdy group included subjects vaccinated with Sputnik V adenovirus vaccine, mRNA vaccines, and CoviVac whole-virion vaccine. Their immune status was assessed by enzyme immunoassay as specific antibody levels. Moreover, the neutralizing ability of detected antibodies was assessed using a cell test system based on pseudoviral technology.
 All of the mentioned vaccines were shown to elicit an immune response against SARS-CoV-2 RBD antigen, however, appropriate antibody titers and neutralizing capacities differed depending on the type of vaccine. The mRNA vaccines proved to be the most immunogenic, the effectiveness of the immune response to the Sputnik V adenovirus-based vaccine was lower. However, 6 months after vaccination, the effectiveness of virus neutralizing antibodies induced by these vaccines did not differ. The whole-virion CoviVac vaccine with proven efficiency by independent epidemiological studies, induced an antibody response against the RBD protein to a lesser extent.
 The seropositive participants of the study, both previously exposed to COVID-19 disease or vaccinated, exhibited high-titer production of antibodies already after the first dose of the Sputnik V vaccine, and a significantly higher antibody titer 6 months after the booster immunization as compared with initial level of antibodies, along with direct correlation between the antibody titers and their neutralizing activity.","PeriodicalId":21507,"journal":{"name":"Russian journal of immunology : RJI : official journal of Russian Society of Immunology","volume":"6 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Russian journal of immunology : RJI : official journal of Russian Society of Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46235/1028-7221-13943-coi","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The pandemic of coronavirus infection (COVID-19) has stimulated the development, testing and widespread use of preventive vaccines based on various platforms. Our aim was to perform a direct comparison of immunogenicity of various vaccines within a single study in small groups within six months of SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and revaccination. The stdy group included subjects vaccinated with Sputnik V adenovirus vaccine, mRNA vaccines, and CoviVac whole-virion vaccine. Their immune status was assessed by enzyme immunoassay as specific antibody levels. Moreover, the neutralizing ability of detected antibodies was assessed using a cell test system based on pseudoviral technology. All of the mentioned vaccines were shown to elicit an immune response against SARS-CoV-2 RBD antigen, however, appropriate antibody titers and neutralizing capacities differed depending on the type of vaccine. The mRNA vaccines proved to be the most immunogenic, the effectiveness of the immune response to the Sputnik V adenovirus-based vaccine was lower. However, 6 months after vaccination, the effectiveness of virus neutralizing antibodies induced by these vaccines did not differ. The whole-virion CoviVac vaccine with proven efficiency by independent epidemiological studies, induced an antibody response against the RBD protein to a lesser extent. The seropositive participants of the study, both previously exposed to COVID-19 disease or vaccinated, exhibited high-titer production of antibodies already after the first dose of the Sputnik V vaccine, and a significantly higher antibody titer 6 months after the booster immunization as compared with initial level of antibodies, along with direct correlation between the antibody titers and their neutralizing activity.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
开始接种和重新接种后6个月内对各种SARS-CoV-2疫苗免疫反应的比较
冠状病毒感染(COVID-19)大流行刺激了基于各种平台的预防性疫苗的开发、测试和广泛使用。我们的目的是在接种SARS-CoV-2疫苗和重新接种疫苗六个月内的小群体中,在一项单一研究中对各种疫苗的免疫原性进行直接比较。研究组包括接种了Sputnik V腺病毒疫苗、mRNA疫苗和CoviVac全病毒粒子疫苗的受试者。采用酶免疫分析法测定其特异性抗体水平,评估其免疫状态。此外,使用基于伪病毒技术的细胞测试系统评估检测到的抗体的中和能力。 所有上述疫苗均显示出针对SARS-CoV-2 RBD抗原的免疫应答,然而,适当的抗体滴度和中和能力因疫苗类型而异。mRNA疫苗被证明是最具免疫原性的,而基于Sputnik V腺病毒的疫苗免疫应答的有效性较低。然而,接种疫苗6个月后,这些疫苗诱导的病毒中和抗体的有效性没有差异。经独立流行病学研究证实有效的全病毒粒子CoviVac疫苗在较小程度上诱导了针对RBD蛋白的抗体应答。该研究的血清阳性参与者,无论是先前暴露于COVID-19疾病还是接种过疫苗,在第一剂Sputnik V疫苗后已经表现出高滴度的抗体产生,并且在加强免疫后6个月的抗体滴度与初始抗体水平相比显着更高,并且抗体滴度与其中和活性之间存在直接相关性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Levels of TREC and KREC molecules significance determining in peripheral blood for predicting the outcome of COVID-19 disease in the acute period Characteristic changes of extracellular Dna levels, indices of netosis and inflammation in peripheral blood in patients with asthma Contents of matrix metalloproteinase type 2 (MMP-2) and complexes MMP-9/TIMP-1, MMP-2/TIMP-2, and total cholesterol in practically healthy people and patients with hypertension Immunological and biochemical markers of adverse outcome in COVID-19 and arterial hypertension Clinical and immunological efficacy of immunomodulating hexapeptide associated with the restoration of CD11b<sup>+</sup>CD64<sup>-</sup>CD32<sup>+</sup>CD16<sup>+</sup> and CD11b<sup>+</sup>CD64<sup>+</sup>CD32<sup>+</sup>CD16<sup>+</sup> neutrophil granulocytes subset in women with chronic infectious and inflammatory diseases of the pelvic organs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1