Text classification in fair competition law violations using deep learning

IF 1.3 Q3 MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.3389/fams.2023.1177081
Yinying Kong, Niangqiu Huang, Haodong Deng, Junwen Feng, Xingyi Liang, Weisi Lv, Jingyi Liu
{"title":"Text classification in fair competition law violations using deep learning","authors":"Yinying Kong, Niangqiu Huang, Haodong Deng, Junwen Feng, Xingyi Liang, Weisi Lv, Jingyi Liu","doi":"10.3389/fams.2023.1177081","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction Ensuring fair competition through manual review is a complex undertaking. This paper introduces the utilization of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and TextCNN to establish a text classifier for classifying and reviewing normative documents. Methods The experimental dataset used consists of policy measure samples provided by the antitrust division of the Guangdong Market Supervision Administration. We conduct a comparative analysis of the performance of LSTM and TextCNN classification models. Results In three classification experiments conducted without an enhanced experimental dataset, the LSTM classifier achieved an accuracy of 95.74%, while the TextCNN classifier achieved an accuracy of 92.7% on the test set. Conversely, in three classification experiments utilizing an enhanced experimental dataset, the LSTM classifier demonstrated an accuracy of 96.36%, and the TextCNN classifier achieved an accuracy of 96.19% on the test set. Discussion The experimental results highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and TextCNN in classifying and reviewing normative documents. The superior accuracy achieved with the enhanced experimental dataset underscores the potential of these models in real-world applications, particularly in tasks involving fair competition review.","PeriodicalId":36662,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","volume":"55 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fams.2023.1177081","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction Ensuring fair competition through manual review is a complex undertaking. This paper introduces the utilization of Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) neural networks and TextCNN to establish a text classifier for classifying and reviewing normative documents. Methods The experimental dataset used consists of policy measure samples provided by the antitrust division of the Guangdong Market Supervision Administration. We conduct a comparative analysis of the performance of LSTM and TextCNN classification models. Results In three classification experiments conducted without an enhanced experimental dataset, the LSTM classifier achieved an accuracy of 95.74%, while the TextCNN classifier achieved an accuracy of 92.7% on the test set. Conversely, in three classification experiments utilizing an enhanced experimental dataset, the LSTM classifier demonstrated an accuracy of 96.36%, and the TextCNN classifier achieved an accuracy of 96.19% on the test set. Discussion The experimental results highlight the effectiveness of LSTM and TextCNN in classifying and reviewing normative documents. The superior accuracy achieved with the enhanced experimental dataset underscores the potential of these models in real-world applications, particularly in tasks involving fair competition review.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于深度学习的公平竞争法违规文本分类
通过人工审查确保公平竞争是一项复杂的工作。本文介绍了利用长短期记忆(LSTM)神经网络和TextCNN建立一个文本分类器,用于对规范性文件进行分类和审阅。方法实验数据集采用广东省市场监督管理局反垄断司提供的政策措施样本。我们对LSTM和TextCNN分类模型的性能进行了比较分析。结果在没有增强实验数据集的情况下进行的3次分类实验中,LSTM分类器的准确率为95.74%,TextCNN分类器在测试集上的准确率为92.7%。相反,在使用增强实验数据集的三个分类实验中,LSTM分类器在测试集上的准确率为96.36%,TextCNN分类器在测试集上的准确率为96.19%。实验结果突出了LSTM和TextCNN在规范文件分类和审查方面的有效性。通过增强的实验数据集获得的卓越准确性强调了这些模型在现实应用中的潜力,特别是在涉及公平竞争审查的任务中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics
Frontiers in Applied Mathematics and Statistics Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
7.10%
发文量
117
审稿时长
14 weeks
期刊最新文献
Third-degree B-spline collocation method for singularly perturbed time delay parabolic problem with two parameters Item response theory to discriminate COVID-19 knowledge and attitudes among university students Editorial: Justified modeling frameworks and novel interpretations of ecological and epidemiological systems Pneumonia and COVID-19 co-infection modeling with optimal control analysis Enhanced corn seed disease classification: leveraging MobileNetV2 with feature augmentation and transfer learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1