On efficiency and the Jain’s fairness index in integer assignment problems

IF 1.3 Q3 SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS Computational Management Science Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1007/s10287-023-00477-9
Nahid Rezaeinia, Julio C. Góez, Mario Guajardo
{"title":"On efficiency and the Jain’s fairness index in integer assignment problems","authors":"Nahid Rezaeinia, Julio C. Góez, Mario Guajardo","doi":"10.1007/s10287-023-00477-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Given two sets of objects, the integer assignment problem consists of assigning objects of one set to objects in the other set. Traditionally, the goal of this problem is to find an assignment that minimizes or maximizes a measure of efficiency, such as maximization of utility or minimization of cost. Lately, the interest in incorporating a measure of fairness in addition to efficiency has gained importance. This paper studies how to incorporate these two criteria in an integer assignment, using the Jain’s index as a measure of fairness. The original formulation of the assignment problem with this index involves a non-concave function, which renders a non-linear non-convex problem, usually hard to solve. To this aim, we develop two reformulations, where one is based on a quadratic objective function and the other one is based on integer second-order cone programming. We explore the performance of these reformulations in instances of real-world data derived from an application of assigning personnel to projects, and also in instances of randomly generated data. In terms of solution quality, all formulations prove to be effective in finding solutions capturing both efficiency and fairness criteria, with some slight differences depending on the type of instance. In terms of solving time, however, the performances of the formulations differ considerably. In particular, the integer quadratic approach proves to be much faster in finding optimal solutions.","PeriodicalId":46743,"journal":{"name":"Computational Management Science","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computational Management Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-023-00477-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Given two sets of objects, the integer assignment problem consists of assigning objects of one set to objects in the other set. Traditionally, the goal of this problem is to find an assignment that minimizes or maximizes a measure of efficiency, such as maximization of utility or minimization of cost. Lately, the interest in incorporating a measure of fairness in addition to efficiency has gained importance. This paper studies how to incorporate these two criteria in an integer assignment, using the Jain’s index as a measure of fairness. The original formulation of the assignment problem with this index involves a non-concave function, which renders a non-linear non-convex problem, usually hard to solve. To this aim, we develop two reformulations, where one is based on a quadratic objective function and the other one is based on integer second-order cone programming. We explore the performance of these reformulations in instances of real-world data derived from an application of assigning personnel to projects, and also in instances of randomly generated data. In terms of solution quality, all formulations prove to be effective in finding solutions capturing both efficiency and fairness criteria, with some slight differences depending on the type of instance. In terms of solving time, however, the performances of the formulations differ considerably. In particular, the integer quadratic approach proves to be much faster in finding optimal solutions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
整数分配问题的效率与Jain公平性指标
摘要给定两组对象,整数赋值问题是将一个集合中的对象赋值给另一个集合中的对象。传统上,这个问题的目标是找到最小化或最大化效率度量的分配,例如效用最大化或成本最小化。最近,在效率之外加入公平标准的兴趣变得越来越重要。本文研究了如何将这两个准则结合到整数赋值中,并使用Jain指数作为公平性度量。该指标赋值问题的原始表述涉及一个非凹函数,这使得非线性非凸问题通常难以求解。为此,我们提出了两种重新表述,其中一种是基于二次目标函数,另一种是基于整数二阶锥规划。我们探讨了这些重新公式在从分配人员到项目的应用程序中获得的真实世界数据实例中的性能,以及在随机生成数据的实例中。在解决方案质量方面,所有公式都证明在找到既符合效率又符合公平标准的解决方案方面是有效的,根据实例的类型有一些细微的差异。然而,在求解时间方面,这些公式的性能差别很大。特别是,整数二次方法在寻找最优解方面被证明要快得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Computational Management Science
Computational Management Science SOCIAL SCIENCES, MATHEMATICAL METHODS-
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
11.10%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Computational Management Science (CMS) is an international journal focusing on all computational aspects of management science. These include theoretical and empirical analysis of computational models; computational statistics; analysis and applications of constrained, unconstrained, robust, stochastic and combinatorial optimisation algorithms; dynamic models, such as dynamic programming and decision trees; new search tools and algorithms for global optimisation, modelling, learning and forecasting; models and tools of knowledge acquisition. The emphasis on computational paradigms is an intended feature of CMS, distinguishing it from more classical operations research journals. Officially cited as: Comput Manag Sci
期刊最新文献
Nested Benders’s decomposition of capacity-planning problems for electricity systems with hydroelectric and renewable generation Preconditioning meets biased compression for efficient distributed optimization Affiliations based bibliometric analysis of publications on parkinson’s disease Addressing the economic and demographic complexity via a neural network approach: risk measures for reverse mortgages Potts game on graphs: static equilibria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1