The Effects of Hot Spot Policing on Community Experiences and Perceptions in a Time of COVID-19 and Calls for Police Reform

IF 2.9 2区 社会学 Q1 CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY Police Quarterly Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1177/10986111231202433
Christopher S. Koper, Weiwei Liu, Bruce G. Taylor, Xiaoyun Wu, William D. Johnson, Jackie Sheridan
{"title":"The Effects of Hot Spot Policing on Community Experiences and Perceptions in a Time of COVID-19 and Calls for Police Reform","authors":"Christopher S. Koper, Weiwei Liu, Bruce G. Taylor, Xiaoyun Wu, William D. Johnson, Jackie Sheridan","doi":"10.1177/10986111231202433","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To extend the limited evidence on how hot spot policing (HSP) strategies affect community experiences, perceptions, and attitudes, police agencies in two cities participated in a randomized experiment involving 102 hot spots that were assigned to a control condition ( n = 51) or to receive a HSP program emphasizing patrol, community engagement, and problem-solving for 14–17 months during 2019 and 2020 ( n = 51). Cross-sectional surveys with hot spot community members were conducted in person before the program ( n = 1082) and, due to COVID-19, by mail and internet afterwards ( n = 768) to assess program effects on crime victimization, views of crime and disorder, and attitudes towards police. In both cities, the evaluation period overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic and the national protests for police reform following the killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis during 2020; in one city, the program was ongoing during these events. Results showed the program had few effects on community experiences and views, though there were some indications it may have improved perceptions of police legitimacy and police misconduct in one city. The findings suggest that HSP strategies do not have harmful effects on community perceptions and might improve some aspects of police-community relations. However, weak program implementation, challenges to survey administration, and the occurrence of both COVID-19 and the George Floyd incident during the study period complicate interpretation of the results.","PeriodicalId":47610,"journal":{"name":"Police Quarterly","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Police Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10986111231202433","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To extend the limited evidence on how hot spot policing (HSP) strategies affect community experiences, perceptions, and attitudes, police agencies in two cities participated in a randomized experiment involving 102 hot spots that were assigned to a control condition ( n = 51) or to receive a HSP program emphasizing patrol, community engagement, and problem-solving for 14–17 months during 2019 and 2020 ( n = 51). Cross-sectional surveys with hot spot community members were conducted in person before the program ( n = 1082) and, due to COVID-19, by mail and internet afterwards ( n = 768) to assess program effects on crime victimization, views of crime and disorder, and attitudes towards police. In both cities, the evaluation period overlapped with the COVID-19 pandemic and the national protests for police reform following the killing of George Floyd by police in Minneapolis during 2020; in one city, the program was ongoing during these events. Results showed the program had few effects on community experiences and views, though there were some indications it may have improved perceptions of police legitimacy and police misconduct in one city. The findings suggest that HSP strategies do not have harmful effects on community perceptions and might improve some aspects of police-community relations. However, weak program implementation, challenges to survey administration, and the occurrence of both COVID-19 and the George Floyd incident during the study period complicate interpretation of the results.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
新冠肺炎疫情下热点警务对社区经验和认知的影响及对警务改革的呼吁
为了扩大热点警务(HSP)策略如何影响社区经验、观念和态度的有限证据,两个城市的警察机构参与了一项随机实验,涉及102个热点,这些热点被分配到控制条件(n = 51)或接受强调巡逻、社区参与和解决问题的HSP计划,时间为2019年至2020年的14-17个月(n = 51)。对热点社区成员进行了横断面调查,在项目实施前进行了面对面调查(n = 1082),由于COVID-19的原因,在项目实施后通过邮件和互联网进行了调查(n = 768),以评估项目对犯罪受害、对犯罪和混乱的看法以及对警察的态度的影响。在这两个城市,评估期与新冠肺炎疫情和2020年明尼阿波利斯警察杀害乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)后的全国警察改革抗议活动重叠;在一个城市,该项目在这些活动期间正在进行。结果显示,该项目对社区经验和观点几乎没有影响,尽管有一些迹象表明,它可能改善了一个城市对警察合法性和警察不当行为的看法。研究结果表明,HSP策略对社区观念没有有害影响,可能会改善警察与社区关系的某些方面。然而,薄弱的计划执行,调查管理的挑战,以及在研究期间同时发生的COVID-19和乔治·弗洛伊德事件使结果的解释复杂化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Police Quarterly
Police Quarterly CRIMINOLOGY & PENOLOGY-
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
6.50%
发文量
22
期刊介绍: Police Quarterly is a scholarly, peer-reviewed journal that publishes theoretical contributions, empirical studies, essays, comparative analyses, critiques, innovative program descriptions, debates, and book reviews on issues related to policing.
期刊最新文献
Factors Promoting and Inhibiting Use of Wellness Resources Among Police: A Mixed Methods Study Law Enforcement-Based Outreach and Treatment Referral as a Response to Opioid Misuse: Assessing Reductions in Overdoses and Costs The 2020 De-Policing: An Empirical Analysis Sergeant Coffee Needs You: Evaluation of a Police Officer Bystander Intervention Program An Examination of Unintentional Use of Force by the Police
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1