Expectancies for Subjective and Antidepressant Effects in Psilocybin Users

IF 1.3 4区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Humanistic Psychology Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1177/00221678231194798
Mitch Earleywine, Maha N. Mian, Joseph A. De Leo
{"title":"Expectancies for Subjective and Antidepressant Effects in Psilocybin Users","authors":"Mitch Earleywine, Maha N. Mian, Joseph A. De Leo","doi":"10.1177/00221678231194798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Expectancy effects for many psychoactive substances appear to play a role in consumption, problematic use, subjective responses to acute administration, and subsequent effects. Expectancies of psychedelics have received little attention in published research despite their reputation for creating dramatic changes in subjective state. Psilocybin-assisted treatment (PAT) improves depression, but details of associated expected effects remain incomplete. Previous work suggests that PAT-induced changes in depression and other forms of well-being covary with specific subjective effects of psilocybin. Self-reports from over 500 psilocybin-using individuals revealed correlations with relevant subjective effects that appeared to mediate antidepressant effects in previous work (e.g., Mystical Experiences, Ego dissolution, and Emotional Breakthrough). Correlations with demographic variables, current depressive symptoms, and general hallucinogen involvement were markedly smaller. Expectancies on specific depressive symptoms also paralleled retrospective reports of other psychedelic-induced antidepressant effects. Regression revealed that current depressive symptoms, ego dissolution, and emotional breakthroughs accounted for unique variance in expected antidepressant effects, but expectancies on mystical effects did not. Although limitations suggest cautious interpretation, psilocybin-using individuals appear to hold relevant expectancies about subjective and antidepressant effects, which might play a role in treatment outcomes worthy of monitoring in clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":47290,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","volume":"59 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Humanistic Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00221678231194798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Expectancy effects for many psychoactive substances appear to play a role in consumption, problematic use, subjective responses to acute administration, and subsequent effects. Expectancies of psychedelics have received little attention in published research despite their reputation for creating dramatic changes in subjective state. Psilocybin-assisted treatment (PAT) improves depression, but details of associated expected effects remain incomplete. Previous work suggests that PAT-induced changes in depression and other forms of well-being covary with specific subjective effects of psilocybin. Self-reports from over 500 psilocybin-using individuals revealed correlations with relevant subjective effects that appeared to mediate antidepressant effects in previous work (e.g., Mystical Experiences, Ego dissolution, and Emotional Breakthrough). Correlations with demographic variables, current depressive symptoms, and general hallucinogen involvement were markedly smaller. Expectancies on specific depressive symptoms also paralleled retrospective reports of other psychedelic-induced antidepressant effects. Regression revealed that current depressive symptoms, ego dissolution, and emotional breakthroughs accounted for unique variance in expected antidepressant effects, but expectancies on mystical effects did not. Although limitations suggest cautious interpretation, psilocybin-using individuals appear to hold relevant expectancies about subjective and antidepressant effects, which might play a role in treatment outcomes worthy of monitoring in clinical trials.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
裸盖菇素使用者对主观和抗抑郁作用的预期
许多精神活性物质的预期效应似乎在消费、有问题的使用、对急性给药的主观反应和随后的影响中发挥作用。致幻剂的预期在已发表的研究中很少受到关注,尽管它们以能引起主观状态的巨大变化而闻名。裸盖菇素辅助治疗(PAT)可改善抑郁症,但相关预期效果的细节仍不完整。先前的研究表明,pat诱导的抑郁和其他形式的幸福感的变化与裸盖菇素的特定主观效应相关。来自500多名裸盖菇素使用者的自我报告揭示了与相关主观效应的相关性,这些主观效应似乎在之前的研究中介导了抗抑郁作用(例如,神秘体验、自我消解和情感突破)。与人口统计学变量、当前抑郁症状和一般致幻剂的相关性明显较小。对特定抑郁症状的预期也与其他致幻剂诱导的抗抑郁作用的回顾性报告相一致。回归显示,当前的抑郁症状、自我消解和情感突破解释了预期抗抑郁药效果的独特差异,但对神秘效果的预期却没有。尽管局限性需要谨慎解释,但使用裸盖菇素的个体似乎对主观和抗抑郁作用有相关的预期,这可能在临床试验中值得监测的治疗结果中发挥作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Humanistic Psychology
Journal of Humanistic Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
44
期刊介绍: The Journal of Humanistic Psychology is an interdisciplinary forum for contributions, controversies and diverse statements pertaining to humanistic psychology. It addresses personal growth, interpersonal encounters, social problems and philosophical issues. An international journal of human potential, self-actualization, the search for meaning and social change, the Journal of Humanistic Psychology was founded by Abraham Maslow and Anthony Sutich in 1961. It is the official journal of the Association for Humanistic Psychology.
期刊最新文献
From Wonder to Transformation: The Lived Experience of Profound Awe Medical School Civic Engagement During COVID-19: Activating Institutions for Equitable Community Response College Students’ Experiences of Freedom, Isolation, Meaninglessness, and Death: A Qualitative Examination Tom Greening—The Incomparable (Tribute Through Tears) The Mourning of the New Year
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1