Delimiting design: expanding the limits of concurrency through set-based concurrent engineering

IF 2.5 2区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Engineering Design Pub Date : 2023-09-22 DOI:10.1080/09544828.2023.2260665
Sean Rismiller, Jonathan Cagan, Christopher McComb
{"title":"Delimiting design: expanding the limits of concurrency through set-based concurrent engineering","authors":"Sean Rismiller, Jonathan Cagan, Christopher McComb","doi":"10.1080/09544828.2023.2260665","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AbstractEngineering design problems are often decomposed and distributed among design teams so that their components may be developed concurrently in a project. Set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE) details a development process that reduces the need for communication and rework, often considered limiting factors to concurrency, by maintaining many candidate designs for each subproblem throughout the design process. This ensures that candidates have some compatible options to combine with as the project progresses rather than needing constant coordination and adaptation. Previous studies of SBCE found positive results in industry and corroborated its claimed benefits with computational models but have yet to study how it interacts with problem decomposition. This work uses the Point/Set-Organised Research Teams (PSORT) platform, a computational model developed to simulate and study SBCE, to investigate how SBCE interacts with a problem decomposed to different degrees to understand its impact on the limits of concurrency. Problem decompositions are also formulated with varying amounts of coupling to further test the interactions of SBCE and concurrency in different situations. Simulations with PSORT find that SBCE becomes more beneficial as problem decomposition increases, suggesting that SBCE expands the limits of concurrency; however small teams may prefer not to use SBCE.KEYWORDS: Concurrent engineeringmulti-agent systemsset-based designproblem decomposition AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Guanglu Zhang and Wenzhuo Xu for their review and comments on this work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data and software availabilityThe data and software used to generate it can be found at the Sean Rismiller PSORT dissertation repository in the ch4 folder at http://doi.org/, reference number 10.5281/zenodo.7814683.","PeriodicalId":50207,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Engineering Design","volume":"334 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Engineering Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09544828.2023.2260665","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

AbstractEngineering design problems are often decomposed and distributed among design teams so that their components may be developed concurrently in a project. Set-based concurrent engineering (SBCE) details a development process that reduces the need for communication and rework, often considered limiting factors to concurrency, by maintaining many candidate designs for each subproblem throughout the design process. This ensures that candidates have some compatible options to combine with as the project progresses rather than needing constant coordination and adaptation. Previous studies of SBCE found positive results in industry and corroborated its claimed benefits with computational models but have yet to study how it interacts with problem decomposition. This work uses the Point/Set-Organised Research Teams (PSORT) platform, a computational model developed to simulate and study SBCE, to investigate how SBCE interacts with a problem decomposed to different degrees to understand its impact on the limits of concurrency. Problem decompositions are also formulated with varying amounts of coupling to further test the interactions of SBCE and concurrency in different situations. Simulations with PSORT find that SBCE becomes more beneficial as problem decomposition increases, suggesting that SBCE expands the limits of concurrency; however small teams may prefer not to use SBCE.KEYWORDS: Concurrent engineeringmulti-agent systemsset-based designproblem decomposition AcknowledgementsThe authors would like to thank Guanglu Zhang and Wenzhuo Xu for their review and comments on this work.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Data and software availabilityThe data and software used to generate it can be found at the Sean Rismiller PSORT dissertation repository in the ch4 folder at http://doi.org/, reference number 10.5281/zenodo.7814683.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
划定设计:通过基于集合的并发工程扩展并发的限制
摘要工程设计问题通常被分解并分布在各个设计团队中,以便他们的组件可以在一个项目中并行开发。基于集合的并发工程(SBCE)详细描述了一个开发过程,通过在整个设计过程中为每个子问题维护许多候选设计,减少了通信和返工的需要,这通常被认为是并发性的限制因素。这确保了候选人有一些兼容的选项来结合项目的进展,而不是需要不断的协调和适应。先前对SBCE的研究在工业中发现了积极的结果,并通过计算模型证实了它所声称的好处,但尚未研究它如何与问题分解相互作用。这项工作使用点/集组织研究团队(PSORT)平台,这是一种用于模拟和研究SBCE的计算模型,研究SBCE如何与不同程度分解的问题相互作用,以了解其对并发限制的影响。问题分解还使用不同数量的耦合来制定,以进一步测试不同情况下SBCE和并发性的相互作用。使用PSORT进行的仿真发现,随着问题分解的增加,SBCE变得更加有利,这表明SBCE扩大了并发性的限制;然而,小团队可能不喜欢使用SBCE。关键词:并行工程多智能体系统基于集的设计问题分解感谢张光禄和徐文卓对本文的回顾和评论。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。数据和软件可用性用于生成它的数据和软件可以在Sean Rismiller PSORT论文存储库中找到,地址为http://doi.org/,参考编号为10.5281/zenodo.7814683。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Engineering Design
Journal of Engineering Design 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
33.30%
发文量
18
审稿时长
4.5 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Engineering Design is a leading international publication that provides an essential forum for dialogue on important issues across all disciplines and aspects of the design of engineered products and systems. The Journal publishes pioneering, contemporary, best industrial practice as well as authoritative research, studies and review papers on the underlying principles of design, its management, practice, techniques and methodologies, rather than specific domain applications. We welcome papers that examine the following topics: Engineering design aesthetics, style and form- Big data analytics in engineering design- Collaborative design in engineering- Engineering concept design- Creativity and innovation in engineering- Engineering design architectures- Design costing in engineering Design education and pedagogy in engineering- Engineering design for X, e.g. manufacturability, assembly, environment, sustainability- Engineering design management- Design risk and uncertainty in engineering- Engineering design theory and methodology- Designing product platforms, modularity and reuse in engineering- Emotive design, e.g. Kansei engineering- Ergonomics, styling and the design process- Evolutionary design activity in engineering (product improvement & refinement)- Global and distributed engineering design- Inclusive design and assistive engineering technology- Engineering industrial design and total design- Integrated engineering design development- Knowledge and information management in engineering- Engineering maintainability, sustainability, safety and standards- Multi, inter and trans disciplinary engineering design- New engineering product design and development- Engineering product introduction process[...]
期刊最新文献
Integrating GRA with intuitionistic fuzzy VIKOR model to explore attractive design solution of wickerwork cultural and creative products Modularity and new product performance: the role of new product development speed and task uncertainty Reconciling platform vs. product optimisation by value-based margins on solutions and parameters Smart industrial information integration: a lightweight privacy protection model in an intelligent manufacturing architecture Lumos: AI-driven prompt optimisation tool for assisting conceptual design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1