Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Natural History Sciences Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.4081/nhs.2023.680
Mark Massaad, Rafael Da Silveira Bueno, Ilham Bentaleb, Tommaso La Mantia
{"title":"Bats of Sicily: historical evidence, current knowledge, research biases and trends","authors":"Mark Massaad, Rafael Da Silveira Bueno, Ilham Bentaleb, Tommaso La Mantia","doi":"10.4081/nhs.2023.680","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Insular bat communities are a preeminent conservation taxon due to their ecological role and intriguing and unique species composition. Sicily is the largest island in the Mediterranean. However, research on Sicilian bats is still scattered, with substantial information being overlooked. Here we present a systematic review of all available bibliographic information from 1810 to 2022, including grey literature, archives, and peer-reviewed publications. The analyses of bibliographic sources permitted us to evaluate the status of research on bats using the Bat Research Efficiency (BRE) and Species-Research Effort Allocation (SREA) metrics. A total of 81 documents were obtained. Since 1955, an average of 1.2 contributions have been issued per year. Over half of the documents are in Italian. The studies are primarily conducted in north-western (40%) and south-eastern (28%) Sicily, mainly in the provinces of Palermo and Siracusa. Most of the contributions concern “Species records” (61%) and “Ecology” (21%). There were 28 species reported, but a significant bias exists towards Myotis myotis, Miniopterus schreibersii, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Myotis capaccinii, and Rhinolophus euryale. Around 31.5% of the studies focused on threatened species, while 68.5% concentrated on non-threatened species, with an overall preference for cave-dwelling species. Yet, SREA analysis demonstrates a lack of research efforts for all species. We encourage the use of a multidisciplinary approach towards under-studied species while covering geographical gaps and increasing public awareness of the functional role of bats in natural ecosystems.","PeriodicalId":52358,"journal":{"name":"Natural History Sciences","volume":"48 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Natural History Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4081/nhs.2023.680","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insular bat communities are a preeminent conservation taxon due to their ecological role and intriguing and unique species composition. Sicily is the largest island in the Mediterranean. However, research on Sicilian bats is still scattered, with substantial information being overlooked. Here we present a systematic review of all available bibliographic information from 1810 to 2022, including grey literature, archives, and peer-reviewed publications. The analyses of bibliographic sources permitted us to evaluate the status of research on bats using the Bat Research Efficiency (BRE) and Species-Research Effort Allocation (SREA) metrics. A total of 81 documents were obtained. Since 1955, an average of 1.2 contributions have been issued per year. Over half of the documents are in Italian. The studies are primarily conducted in north-western (40%) and south-eastern (28%) Sicily, mainly in the provinces of Palermo and Siracusa. Most of the contributions concern “Species records” (61%) and “Ecology” (21%). There were 28 species reported, but a significant bias exists towards Myotis myotis, Miniopterus schreibersii, Rhinolophus ferrumequinum, Myotis capaccinii, and Rhinolophus euryale. Around 31.5% of the studies focused on threatened species, while 68.5% concentrated on non-threatened species, with an overall preference for cave-dwelling species. Yet, SREA analysis demonstrates a lack of research efforts for all species. We encourage the use of a multidisciplinary approach towards under-studied species while covering geographical gaps and increasing public awareness of the functional role of bats in natural ecosystems.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
西西里蝙蝠:历史证据、当前知识、研究偏差和趋势
岛屿蝙蝠群落由于其生态作用和独特的物种组成而成为一个卓越的保护分类群。西西里岛是地中海最大的岛屿。然而,关于西西里蝙蝠的研究仍然零散,大量的信息被忽视了。在这里,我们对1810年至2022年所有可用的书目信息进行了系统回顾,包括灰色文献、档案和同行评审的出版物。对文献来源的分析使我们能够使用蝙蝠研究效率(Bat research Efficiency, BRE)和物种研究努力分配(Species-Research Effort Allocation, SREA)指标来评估蝙蝠的研究现状。共获得81份文件。自1955年以来,每年平均分发1.2份捐款。超过一半的文件是意大利语。这些研究主要在西西里岛西北部(40%)和东南部(28%)进行,主要在巴勒莫和锡拉库萨省。大部分的贡献是关于“物种记录”(61%)和“生态”(21%)。报告的种类有28种,但对Myotis Myotis, schreibersii Miniopterus schreibersii, Rhinolophus ferrummequinum, Myotis capaccinii和euryale Rhinolophus存在明显的偏见。约31.5%的研究集中在受威胁物种上,而68.5%的研究集中在非受威胁物种上,总体上倾向于穴居物种。然而,SREA分析表明缺乏对所有物种的研究。我们鼓励对研究不足的物种采用多学科方法,同时弥补地理空白,提高公众对蝙蝠在自然生态系统中的功能作用的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Natural History Sciences
Natural History Sciences Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Plant Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Erratum. First documented observation of differential dorsoventral coat colouration in wild boar Sus scrofa (Artyodactyla: Suidae) in Italy Two new species of Aulacoscelis Duponchel & Chevrolat 1842 from Mexico (Coleoptera: Orsodacnidae: Aulacoscelidinae) Griburius leonardii, a new species from French Guiana (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Cryptocephalinae) New data on Longitarsus rubellus species group with description of a new species from Western Balkans (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae: Alticini) Redescription of Longitarsus ferruginipennis Fuente 1910 and resurrection of L. seticollis Mohr 1962 (Chrysomelidae: Galerucinae: Alticini)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1