HbA1c control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa

Lona Mhlaba, Dineo Mpanya, Nqoba Tsabedze
{"title":"HbA1c control in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients with coronary artery disease: a retrospective study in a tertiary hospital in South Africa","authors":"Lona Mhlaba, Dineo Mpanya, Nqoba Tsabedze","doi":"10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1258792","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. These patients require optimal glucose control to prevent the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Contemporary guidelines recommend an HbA1c ≤7% to mitigate this risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate HbA1c control in T2DM patients with angiographically proven ASCVD. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study on consecutive T2DM patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes managed in a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. Glycaemic control was assessed by evaluating the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level measured at index presentation with acute and chronic coronary syndromes and during the most recent follow-up visit. Results The study population comprised 262 T2DM patients with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.4 years. At index presentation, 110 (42.0%) T2DM patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 69 (26.3%) had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 43 (16.4%) had unstable angina, and 40 (15.3%) had stable angina. After a median duration of 16.5 months (IQR: 7-29), 28.7% of the study participants had an HbA1c ≤7%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, females were less likely to have poor glycaemic control (HbA1c above 7%) [odds ratio (OR): 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.95, p=0.038]. Also, T2DM patients prescribed metformin monotherapy (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.82, p=0.017) and patients with ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96, p=0.041) were less likely to have poor glycaemic control. Conclusion After a median duration of 16.5 months, only 28.7% of T2DM patients with CAD had an HbA1c ≤7%. This finding underscores the substantial unmet need for optimal diabetes control in this very high-risk group.","PeriodicalId":73075,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","volume":"534 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in clinical diabetes and healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fcdhc.2023.1258792","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) have an increased risk of recurrent cardiovascular events. These patients require optimal glucose control to prevent the progression of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Contemporary guidelines recommend an HbA1c ≤7% to mitigate this risk. The aim of this study was to evaluate HbA1c control in T2DM patients with angiographically proven ASCVD. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional, retrospective study on consecutive T2DM patients with acute and chronic coronary syndromes managed in a tertiary academic hospital in South Africa. Glycaemic control was assessed by evaluating the glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) level measured at index presentation with acute and chronic coronary syndromes and during the most recent follow-up visit. Results The study population comprised 262 T2DM patients with a mean age of 61.3 ± 10.4 years. At index presentation, 110 (42.0%) T2DM patients presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 69 (26.3%) had non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, 43 (16.4%) had unstable angina, and 40 (15.3%) had stable angina. After a median duration of 16.5 months (IQR: 7-29), 28.7% of the study participants had an HbA1c ≤7%. On multivariable logistic regression analysis, females were less likely to have poor glycaemic control (HbA1c above 7%) [odds ratio (OR): 0.42, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.19-0.95, p=0.038]. Also, T2DM patients prescribed metformin monotherapy (OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.82, p=0.017) and patients with ST-segment depression on the electrocardiogram (OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96, p=0.041) were less likely to have poor glycaemic control. Conclusion After a median duration of 16.5 months, only 28.7% of T2DM patients with CAD had an HbA1c ≤7%. This finding underscores the substantial unmet need for optimal diabetes control in this very high-risk group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2型糖尿病合并冠状动脉疾病患者HbA1c控制:南非某三级医院回顾性研究
背景2型糖尿病(T2DM)合并冠状动脉疾病(CAD)的患者心血管事件复发的风险增加。这些患者需要最佳的血糖控制,以防止动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)的进展。现代指南建议HbA1c≤7%以减轻这种风险。本研究的目的是评估T2DM合并血管造影证实的ASCVD患者的HbA1c控制。方法:我们对在南非一家三级学术医院治疗的连续T2DM急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征患者进行了横断面、回顾性研究。通过评估急性和慢性冠状动脉综合征指数表现时以及最近随访期间测量的糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)水平来评估血糖控制。结果T2DM患者262例,平均年龄61.3±10.4岁。T2DM患者有110例(42.0%)表现为st段抬高型心梗,69例(26.3%)表现为非st段抬高型心梗,43例(16.4%)表现为不稳定型心绞痛,40例(15.3%)表现为稳定型心绞痛。中位持续时间为16.5个月(IQR: 7-29)后,28.7%的研究参与者HbA1c≤7%。在多变量logistic回归分析中,女性血糖控制不良(HbA1c高于7%)的可能性较小[优势比(OR): 0.42, 95%可信区间(CI): 0.19-0.95, p=0.038]。此外,使用二甲双胍单药治疗的T2DM患者(OR: 0.34, 95% CI: 0.14-0.82, p=0.017)和心电图上st段下降的患者(OR: 0.39, 95% CI: 0.16-0.96, p=0.041)血糖控制不良的可能性较小。结论中位病程16.5个月后,只有28.7%的T2DM合并CAD患者HbA1c≤7%。这一发现强调了在这一高危人群中对最佳糖尿病控制的大量未满足需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Utilization of basic diabetes mellitus services among adult patients with diabetes mellitus at Mbarara Regional Referral Hospital diabetes clinic, Uganda: a cross-sectional study. Optimizing glycemic control in type 2 diabetes: the impact of the GLIDE program's personalized digital health intervention. Metabolic syndrome among type 2 Diabetes Mellitus patients in Ethiopia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Novel antidiabetic therapies in patients with peripheral artery disease: current perspective. Editorial: Gestational diabetes: where are we and where are we going?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1