Design's secret partner in research: Cybernetic practices for design research pedagogy

IF 1.8 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE Pub Date : 2023-09-10 DOI:10.1002/sres.2974
Ben Sweeting, Sally Sutherland
{"title":"Design's secret partner in research: Cybernetic practices for design research pedagogy","authors":"Ben Sweeting, Sally Sutherland","doi":"10.1002/sres.2974","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract How to understand the relation between design and research is a longstanding question in design theory and practice. It is also a question in design pedagogy, especially in taught postgraduate programmes where students are expected to engage with and conduct research in formal ways, often for the first time. In this article, we discuss a curriculum that we have developed for introducing research literacy to taught postgraduate students in architecture and design disciplines. The curriculum draws both explicitly and implicitly on an analogy between designing and researching developed through the lens of cybernetics, a transdisciplinary field that relates to both design and science. When cybernetics has been invoked in the context of design, it has usually been as a form of explanatory theory, contributing to the theoretical foundations of design research and its relations with other disciplines. Our approach instead positions cybernetics as a mode of transdisciplinary engagement within students' own learning where an unfamiliar topic (research) is approached through analogy to a familiar one (design). We begin by contextualizing the curriculum and introducing the rationale for this approach in the context of design research. We then summarize key moments in the curriculum and our observations of its impact in students' work. We conclude by speculating on the extent to which enacted analogies such as the example presented here may be taken up in other practical situations, and the potential value of doing so in reformulating cybernetics in ways that are practiced (rather than abstract) and methodological (not just explanatory).","PeriodicalId":47538,"journal":{"name":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","volume":"35 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SYSTEMS RESEARCH AND BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2974","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract How to understand the relation between design and research is a longstanding question in design theory and practice. It is also a question in design pedagogy, especially in taught postgraduate programmes where students are expected to engage with and conduct research in formal ways, often for the first time. In this article, we discuss a curriculum that we have developed for introducing research literacy to taught postgraduate students in architecture and design disciplines. The curriculum draws both explicitly and implicitly on an analogy between designing and researching developed through the lens of cybernetics, a transdisciplinary field that relates to both design and science. When cybernetics has been invoked in the context of design, it has usually been as a form of explanatory theory, contributing to the theoretical foundations of design research and its relations with other disciplines. Our approach instead positions cybernetics as a mode of transdisciplinary engagement within students' own learning where an unfamiliar topic (research) is approached through analogy to a familiar one (design). We begin by contextualizing the curriculum and introducing the rationale for this approach in the context of design research. We then summarize key moments in the curriculum and our observations of its impact in students' work. We conclude by speculating on the extent to which enacted analogies such as the example presented here may be taken up in other practical situations, and the potential value of doing so in reformulating cybernetics in ways that are practiced (rather than abstract) and methodological (not just explanatory).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
设计在研究中的秘密伙伴:设计研究教学法的控制论实践
如何理解设计与研究的关系是设计理论与实践中一个长期存在的问题。这也是设计教育学中的一个问题,特别是在授课型研究生课程中,学生通常是第一次以正式的方式参与和开展研究。在这篇文章中,我们讨论了我们为向建筑和设计学科的研究生介绍研究素养而开发的课程。该课程既明确又含蓄地通过控制论的视角来类比设计和研究,这是一个涉及设计和科学的跨学科领域。当控制论在设计的背景下被引用时,它通常是作为一种解释理论的形式,有助于设计研究的理论基础及其与其他学科的关系。相反,我们的方法将控制论定位为学生自己学习中的跨学科参与模式,通过类比熟悉的主题(设计)来接近不熟悉的主题(研究)。我们首先将课程背景化,并在设计研究的背景下介绍这种方法的基本原理。然后,我们总结了课程中的关键时刻,以及我们观察到的课程对学生工作的影响。最后,我们推测在何种程度上制定的类比,如这里提出的例子,可能会在其他实际情况下被采用,以及这样做的潜在价值,以实践(而不是抽象)和方法(而不仅仅是解释)的方式重新制定控制论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
14.80%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: Systems Research and Behavioral Science publishes original articles on new theories, experimental research, and applications relating to all levels of living and non-living systems. Its scope is comprehensive, dealing with systems approaches to: the redesign of organisational and societal structures; the management of administrative and business processes; problems of change management; the implementation of procedures to increase the quality of work and life; the resolution of clashes of norms and values; social cognitive processes; modelling; the introduction of new scientific results, etc. The editors especially want manuscripts of a theoretical or empirical nature which have broad interdisciplinary implications not found in a journal devoted to a single discipline.
期刊最新文献
Rural electrification in India: A wicked problem Enhancing group recommender systems: A fusion of social tagging and collaborative filtering for cohesive recommendations Archetypal representations of dilemmas concerning invasive alien species management—A case of invasive Lantana camara in the protected areas of Nilgiri Biosphere Reserve, India Understanding vehicle demand dynamics in Indian road transport: A qualitative framework An application of systems thinking to group-based organisations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1