Diagnostic accuracy and importance of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the prediction of malignancy in thyroid nodules

Hasan Atlı, Ramazan Dayanan
{"title":"Diagnostic accuracy and importance of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology in the prediction of malignancy in thyroid nodules","authors":"Hasan Atlı, Ramazan Dayanan","doi":"10.36472/msd.v10i10.1065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: Since thyroid nodules have low malignant potential and thyroid cancers progress slowly, early diagnosis is important for a longer life expectancy. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a cost-effective method with an easy application, low complication rate and high diagnostic value. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnosis accuracy and prevalence of thyroid cancer by comparing the findings of FNA procedures performed in our center with definitive histopathology results of patients undergoing surgery after FNA and then comparing these results to the literature. Materials and Methods: Cytology reports of 1040 patients who underwent thyroid FNA between January 2021 and October 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Definitive histopathology results of 146 patients who underwent total or subtotal thyroidectomy were compared with preoperative FNA cytology results. Thyroid cytological results were classified according to the 2017 Bethesda system diagnostic categories. Results: Cases with definitive histopathology results indicating malignancy accounted for 33.3% of non-diagnostic cases, 14.5% of benign, 18.5% of atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS)/FLUS, 33.3% of follicular neoplasm or suspected follicular neoplasm, 75.0% of suspected malignancy and 100% of malignant preoperative FNAC results. For malignant cases, FNA had a sensitivity of 47.5%, specificity of 98.1%, false-positive rate of 20.8%, false-negative rate of 17.2%, positive predictive value of 79.1%, negative predictive value of 82.8% and accuracy rate of 72.8%. Conclusion: In this study, the prevalence of thyroid cancer exceeded the cancer rates predicted by the 2017 Bethesda classification. Thyroid cancer may be predicted by the follow-up of patients with solitary or multiple nodules without a surgical indication, and a repeat FNA when necessary.","PeriodicalId":18486,"journal":{"name":"Medical Science and Discovery","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Science and Discovery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36472/msd.v10i10.1065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Since thyroid nodules have low malignant potential and thyroid cancers progress slowly, early diagnosis is important for a longer life expectancy. Fine needle aspiration (FNA) is a cost-effective method with an easy application, low complication rate and high diagnostic value. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnosis accuracy and prevalence of thyroid cancer by comparing the findings of FNA procedures performed in our center with definitive histopathology results of patients undergoing surgery after FNA and then comparing these results to the literature. Materials and Methods: Cytology reports of 1040 patients who underwent thyroid FNA between January 2021 and October 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. Definitive histopathology results of 146 patients who underwent total or subtotal thyroidectomy were compared with preoperative FNA cytology results. Thyroid cytological results were classified according to the 2017 Bethesda system diagnostic categories. Results: Cases with definitive histopathology results indicating malignancy accounted for 33.3% of non-diagnostic cases, 14.5% of benign, 18.5% of atypia or follicular lesion of undetermined significance (AUS)/FLUS, 33.3% of follicular neoplasm or suspected follicular neoplasm, 75.0% of suspected malignancy and 100% of malignant preoperative FNAC results. For malignant cases, FNA had a sensitivity of 47.5%, specificity of 98.1%, false-positive rate of 20.8%, false-negative rate of 17.2%, positive predictive value of 79.1%, negative predictive value of 82.8% and accuracy rate of 72.8%. Conclusion: In this study, the prevalence of thyroid cancer exceeded the cancer rates predicted by the 2017 Bethesda classification. Thyroid cancer may be predicted by the follow-up of patients with solitary or multiple nodules without a surgical indication, and a repeat FNA when necessary.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
细针穿刺细胞学在甲状腺结节恶性预测中的诊断准确性和重要性
目的:由于甲状腺结节的恶性潜能低,甲状腺癌进展缓慢,早期诊断对延长预期寿命很重要。细针抽吸(FNA)是一种应用简单、并发症发生率低、诊断价值高、性价比高的方法。本研究的目的是通过比较本中心FNA手术的结果与FNA手术后患者的明确组织病理学结果,并将这些结果与文献进行比较,来评估甲状腺癌的诊断准确性和患病率。材料和方法:回顾性分析2021年1月至2022年10月期间1040例甲状腺FNA患者的细胞学报告。我们将146例甲状腺全切除术或次全切除术患者的组织病理学结果与术前FNA细胞学结果进行比较。甲状腺细胞学结果根据2017 Bethesda系统诊断分类进行分类。结果:组织病理学结果明确为恶性的病例占未诊断病例的33.3%,良性占14.5%,异型或意义不明的滤泡性病变(AUS)/FLUS占18.5%,滤泡性肿瘤或疑似滤泡性肿瘤占33.3%,疑似恶性占75.0%,术前FNAC结果为恶性的占100%。FNA对恶性病例的敏感性为47.5%,特异性为98.1%,假阳性率为20.8%,假阴性率为17.2%,阳性预测值为79.1%,阴性预测值为82.8%,准确率为72.8%。结论:在本研究中,甲状腺癌的患病率超过了2017年Bethesda分类预测的癌率。甲状腺癌可以通过对无手术指征的单发或多发结节患者的随访来预测,必要时进行重复FNA检查。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Findings in Patients with Multinodular Vacuolating Neuronal Tumors Complicated Thoracic Hydatidosis Characterizing Bacterial Colonization in Pilonidal Sinus Abscesses: Insights from 159 Clinical Evaluations Efficacy of Ranibizumab in the Treatment of Macular Edema Secondary to Retinal Vein Occlusion Role of Osteopontin and NGAL in Differential Diagnosis of Acute Exacerbations of COPD and Pneumonia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1