Constructing a transnational childcare bricolage: Chinese migrant families in Italy coordinating transnational mobility and childcare

IF 2.3 1区 社会学 Q2 SOCIOLOGY European Societies Pub Date : 2023-10-11 DOI:10.1080/14616696.2023.2267638
Ru Gao, Devi Sacchetto
{"title":"Constructing a transnational childcare bricolage: Chinese migrant families in Italy coordinating transnational mobility and childcare","authors":"Ru Gao, Devi Sacchetto","doi":"10.1080/14616696.2023.2267638","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACTResearch on the childcare arrangements of migrant families has primarily focused on transnational childcare practices or childcare-work reconciliation in the host society, without paying appropriate attention to the dynamic and complex negotiation processes that underlie mobility-childcare coordination. This study proposes the concept of transnational childcare bricolage to explore how Chinese migrant families in Italy mobilize and (re)assemble transnationally located and/or unconventional resources and constantly (re)adjust childcare arrangements to achieve a nuanced match between evolving childcare demand and capacity. The study draws on in-depth interviews with members from 50 Chinese migrant families in Italy, as well as participant observation and multi-sited ethnographic observation. Through analyses of their mobility-childcare negotiation processes, we illustrate how migrant families from different social class backgrounds navigate the complexities and contingencies embedded within a family-state-transnational triad. Additionally, our research questions the ethnicized division of care work between migrants and natives, highlighting common experiences of marginalization and work-care tensions faced by women of similar socio-economic positioning, regardless of their ethnicity and/or nationality.KEYWORDS: Transnational mobilitychildcaretransnational childcare bricolageChinese migrant familyItaly AcknowledgementsWe would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers and Professor Francesca Alice Vianello for their thoughtful and constructive comments, which greatly contributed to improving the quality of our manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In this article, we use business ownership as an analytical marker for social class positions within the specific context of Chinese migrants’ childcare strategies. We acknowledge that class identities and distinctions can be fluid, multifaceted, and situated on a continuum, as well as shaped by various factors, such as occupation, income, education, social status, and cultural capital. Nevertheless, our analysis of the interviewees’ experiences revealed the influential role of family businesses in shaping Chinese migrants’ childcare arrangements, which is consistent with the findings from prior studies (e.g., Ceccagno Citation2007; Citation2016; Krause and Bressan Citation2018). In our analysis of 50 Chinese migrant families, we observed limited ambiguity in class distinctions based on business ownership, as none of the interviewed parents occupied white-collar or managerial positions. Such occupations only have minimal representation within the overall employment landscape of Chinese migrants in Italy (Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali Citation2022: 19).2 http://dati.istat.it/, retrieved 2023, 04, 26.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Beijing Foreign Studies University, under Grant number 215500121003.Notes on contributorsRu GaoRu Gao holds a Ph.D. in social sciences from the University of Padua, Italy, and currently serves as a lecturer at Beijing Foreign Studies University within the School of European Languages and Cultures. Her research expertise lies in the field of population mobility and cultural interactions between China and Italy.Devi SacchettoDevi Sacchetto is a professor of sociology of work at the University of Padua. His research interest is in labour migration and labour process. He has published widely on these topics. His book with Gabriella Alberti, The Politics of Migrant Labour, is expected to be published in January 2024 by Bristol University Press.","PeriodicalId":47392,"journal":{"name":"European Societies","volume":"129 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14616696.2023.2267638","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACTResearch on the childcare arrangements of migrant families has primarily focused on transnational childcare practices or childcare-work reconciliation in the host society, without paying appropriate attention to the dynamic and complex negotiation processes that underlie mobility-childcare coordination. This study proposes the concept of transnational childcare bricolage to explore how Chinese migrant families in Italy mobilize and (re)assemble transnationally located and/or unconventional resources and constantly (re)adjust childcare arrangements to achieve a nuanced match between evolving childcare demand and capacity. The study draws on in-depth interviews with members from 50 Chinese migrant families in Italy, as well as participant observation and multi-sited ethnographic observation. Through analyses of their mobility-childcare negotiation processes, we illustrate how migrant families from different social class backgrounds navigate the complexities and contingencies embedded within a family-state-transnational triad. Additionally, our research questions the ethnicized division of care work between migrants and natives, highlighting common experiences of marginalization and work-care tensions faced by women of similar socio-economic positioning, regardless of their ethnicity and/or nationality.KEYWORDS: Transnational mobilitychildcaretransnational childcare bricolageChinese migrant familyItaly AcknowledgementsWe would like to express our sincere gratitude to the reviewers and Professor Francesca Alice Vianello for their thoughtful and constructive comments, which greatly contributed to improving the quality of our manuscript.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1 In this article, we use business ownership as an analytical marker for social class positions within the specific context of Chinese migrants’ childcare strategies. We acknowledge that class identities and distinctions can be fluid, multifaceted, and situated on a continuum, as well as shaped by various factors, such as occupation, income, education, social status, and cultural capital. Nevertheless, our analysis of the interviewees’ experiences revealed the influential role of family businesses in shaping Chinese migrants’ childcare arrangements, which is consistent with the findings from prior studies (e.g., Ceccagno Citation2007; Citation2016; Krause and Bressan Citation2018). In our analysis of 50 Chinese migrant families, we observed limited ambiguity in class distinctions based on business ownership, as none of the interviewed parents occupied white-collar or managerial positions. Such occupations only have minimal representation within the overall employment landscape of Chinese migrants in Italy (Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali Citation2022: 19).2 http://dati.istat.it/, retrieved 2023, 04, 26.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Beijing Foreign Studies University, under Grant number 215500121003.Notes on contributorsRu GaoRu Gao holds a Ph.D. in social sciences from the University of Padua, Italy, and currently serves as a lecturer at Beijing Foreign Studies University within the School of European Languages and Cultures. Her research expertise lies in the field of population mobility and cultural interactions between China and Italy.Devi SacchettoDevi Sacchetto is a professor of sociology of work at the University of Padua. His research interest is in labour migration and labour process. He has published widely on these topics. His book with Gabriella Alberti, The Politics of Migrant Labour, is expected to be published in January 2024 by Bristol University Press.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构建跨国托儿拼盘:意大利中国移民家庭跨国流动与托儿协调
关于移民家庭托儿安排的研究主要集中在东道国社会的跨国托儿实践或托儿-工作协调方面,而没有适当关注流动-托儿协调背后的动态和复杂的谈判过程。本研究提出了跨国托儿拼装的概念,以探讨在意大利的中国移民家庭如何调动和(重新)组装跨国和/或非常规资源,并不断(重新)调整托儿安排,以实现不断变化的托儿需求和能力之间的微妙匹配。本研究通过对意大利50个中国移民家庭成员的深入访谈,以及参与式观察和多地点民族志观察。通过对流动-儿童保育谈判过程的分析,我们说明了来自不同社会阶层背景的移民家庭如何在家庭-国家-跨国三位一体中应对复杂性和偶然性。此外,我们的研究对移民和本地人之间护理工作的种族分工提出了质疑,强调了具有相似社会经济地位的妇女所面临的边缘化和工作护理紧张关系的共同经历,无论其种族和/或国籍如何。关键词:跨国流动儿童保育跨国托儿拼贴中国移民家庭意大利致谢感谢审稿人和Francesca Alice Vianello教授的周到和建设性意见,对提高我们稿件的质量做出了很大的贡献。披露声明作者未报告潜在的利益冲突。注1在本文中,我们将企业所有权作为社会阶层地位的分析标记,并将其置于中国流动人口育儿策略的特定背景下。我们承认,阶级身份和区别可以是流动的、多方面的、处于连续统一体的,并受到职业、收入、教育、社会地位和文化资本等各种因素的影响。然而,我们对受访者经历的分析揭示了家族企业在塑造中国移民儿童保育安排方面的重要作用,这与之前的研究结果一致(例如,Ceccagno Citation2007;Citation2016;Krause and Bressan Citation2018)。在我们对50个中国移民家庭的分析中,我们观察到基于企业所有权的阶级区分有限的模糊性,因为受访的父母都没有担任白领或管理职位。这些职业在意大利中国移民的整体就业格局中只占最小的代表性(Ministero del Lavoro e delle Politiche Sociali Citation2022: 19)。2 http://dati.istat.it/,检索2023,04,26。本工作由北京外国语大学中央高校基本科研业务费资助,批准号:215500121003。高如,意大利帕多瓦大学社会科学博士,现任北京外国语大学欧洲语言与文化学院讲师。她的研究专长是中国和意大利的人口流动和文化互动领域。Devi Sacchetto是帕多瓦大学的工作社会学教授。主要研究方向为劳动力迁移与劳动力过程。他就这些主题发表了大量文章。他与加布里埃拉·阿尔贝蒂合著的《移民劳工的政治》一书预计将于2024年1月由布里斯托尔大学出版社出版。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Societies
European Societies SOCIOLOGY-
CiteScore
15.70
自引率
1.20%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: European Societies, the flagship journal of the European Sociological Association, aims to promote and share sociological research related to Europe. As a generalist sociology journal, we welcome research from all areas of sociology. However, we have a specific focus on addressing the socio-economic and socio-political challenges faced by European societies, as well as exploring all aspects of European social life and socioculture. Our journal is committed to upholding ethical standards and academic independence. We conduct a rigorous and anonymous review process for all submitted manuscripts. This ensures the quality and integrity of the research we publish. European Societies encourages a plurality of perspectives within the sociology discipline. We embrace a wide range of sociological methods and theoretical approaches. Furthermore, we are open to articles that adopt a historical perspective and engage in comparative research involving Europe as a whole or specific European countries. We also appreciate comparative studies that include societies beyond Europe. In summary, European Societies is dedicated to promoting sociological research with a focus on European societies. We welcome diverse methodological and theoretical approaches, historical perspectives, and comparative studies involving Europe and other societies.
期刊最新文献
Settling into uncertainty and risk amidst the COVID-19 pandemic and the war in Ukraine Gender compositions of occupations and firms jointly shape switches from gender-atypical towards more gender-typical positions The effect of the month of birth on academic achievement: heterogeneity by social origin and gender Do they think that joy and misery are temporary? Comparing trajectories of current and predicted life satisfaction across life events Narrowing inequalities through redistribution. A relational inequality approach to female managers and the gender wage gap
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1