Consistent estimation of panel data sample selection models

IF 2 Q2 ECONOMICS Econometrics and Statistics Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ecosta.2023.11.003
Sergi Jiménez-Martín, José M. Labeaga, Majid al Sadoon
{"title":"Consistent estimation of panel data sample selection models","authors":"Sergi Jiménez-Martín, José M. Labeaga, Majid al Sadoon","doi":"10.1016/j.ecosta.2023.11.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The properties of classical panel data estimators including fixed effect, first-differences, random effects, and generalized method of moments-instrumental variables estimators in both static as well as dynamic panel data models are investigated under sample selection. The correlation of the unobserved errors is shown not to be sufficient for the inconsistency of these estimators. A necessary condition for this to arise is the presence of common (and/or non-independent) non-deterministic covariates in the selection and outcome equations. When both equations do not have covariates in common and independent of each other, the fixed effects, and random effects estimators in static models with exogenous covariates are consistent. Furthermore, the first-differenced generalized method of moments estimator uncorrected for sample selection as well as the instrumental variables estimator uncorrected for sample selection are both consistent for autoregressive models even with endogenous covariates. The same results hold when both equations have no covariates in common but are correlated once we account for such correlation. Under the same circumstances, the system generalized method of moments estimator adding more moments from the levels equation has moderate bias. Alternatively, when both equations have common covariates the appropriate correction method is suggested. Serial correlation of the errors being a key determinant for that choice. The finite sample properties of the proposed estimators are evaluated using a Monte Carlo study. Two empirical illustrations are provided.","PeriodicalId":54125,"journal":{"name":"Econometrics and Statistics","volume":"46 11","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Econometrics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecosta.2023.11.003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The properties of classical panel data estimators including fixed effect, first-differences, random effects, and generalized method of moments-instrumental variables estimators in both static as well as dynamic panel data models are investigated under sample selection. The correlation of the unobserved errors is shown not to be sufficient for the inconsistency of these estimators. A necessary condition for this to arise is the presence of common (and/or non-independent) non-deterministic covariates in the selection and outcome equations. When both equations do not have covariates in common and independent of each other, the fixed effects, and random effects estimators in static models with exogenous covariates are consistent. Furthermore, the first-differenced generalized method of moments estimator uncorrected for sample selection as well as the instrumental variables estimator uncorrected for sample selection are both consistent for autoregressive models even with endogenous covariates. The same results hold when both equations have no covariates in common but are correlated once we account for such correlation. Under the same circumstances, the system generalized method of moments estimator adding more moments from the levels equation has moderate bias. Alternatively, when both equations have common covariates the appropriate correction method is suggested. Serial correlation of the errors being a key determinant for that choice. The finite sample properties of the proposed estimators are evaluated using a Monte Carlo study. Two empirical illustrations are provided.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面板数据样本选择模型的一致性估计
在样本选择的条件下,研究了静态和动态面板数据模型中经典面板数据估计量的性质,包括固定效应、第一差分、随机效应和广义矩量方法-工具变量估计量。未观测误差的相关性不足以解释这些估计的不一致性。出现这种情况的必要条件是在选择和结果方程中存在共同(和/或非独立)非确定性协变量。当两个方程没有共同且相互独立的协变量时,具有外源性协变量的静态模型中的固定效应和随机效应估计量是一致的。此外,对于自回归模型,即使存在内源性协变量,一阶差分广义矩估计法和工具变量估计法在样本选择上都是一致的。当两个方程没有共同的协变量,但一旦我们考虑到这种相关性,就会产生相同的结果。在相同的情况下,从水平方程中加入更多矩的系统广义矩估计方法具有中等的偏差。或者,当两个方程有共同的协变量时,建议适当的修正方法。误差的序列相关性是该选择的关键决定因素。利用蒙特卡罗方法对所提估计量的有限样本性质进行了评估。给出了两个实证例证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
10.50%
发文量
84
期刊介绍: Econometrics and Statistics is the official journal of the networks Computational and Financial Econometrics and Computational and Methodological Statistics. It publishes research papers in all aspects of econometrics and statistics and comprises of the two sections Part A: Econometrics and Part B: Statistics.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Empirical best predictors under multivariate Fay-Herriot models and their numerical approximation Forecasting with Machine Learning methods and multiple large datasets[formula omitted] Specification tests for normal/gamma and stable/gamma stochastic frontier models based on empirical transforms A Bayesian flexible model for testing Granger causality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1