Computed tomography-based delta-radiomics of tumor core_edge combination for systemic treatment response evaluation in pancreatic cancer

Xiang Li, Na Lu, Peijun Hu, Yiwen Chen, Liying Liu, Xinyuan Liu, Chengxiang Guo, Wenbo Xiao, Ke Sun, Jingsong Li, Xueli Bai, Tingbo Liang
{"title":"Computed tomography-based delta-radiomics of tumor core_edge combination for systemic treatment response evaluation in pancreatic cancer","authors":"Xiang Li, Na Lu, Peijun Hu, Yiwen Chen, Liying Liu, Xinyuan Liu, Chengxiang Guo, Wenbo Xiao, Ke Sun, Jingsong Li, Xueli Bai, Tingbo Liang","doi":"10.1097/jp9.0000000000000148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: As a systemic disease, pancreatic cancer (PC) can be treated systemically to raise the R 0 resection rate and enhance patient prognosis. The best ways to assess the treatment response to systemic treatment of patients with PC are still lacking. Methods: A total of 122 PC patients were enrolled; 25 of these patients were used as an independent testing set. According to the pathologic response, PC patients were classified into the responder and non-responder groups. The whole tumor, core, edge, and peritumoral were segmented from the enhanced CT images. Machine learning models were created by extracting the variations in radionics features before and after therapy (delta radiomics features). Finally, we compared the performance of models based on radiomics features, changes in tumor markers, and radiologic evaluation. Results: The model based on the core (Area under Curve, AUC=0.864) and edge features (AUC=0.853) showed better performance than that based on the whole tumor (AUC=0.847) or peritumoral area (AUC=0.846). Moreover, the tumor core_edge combination model (AUC=0.899) could better increase confidence in treatment response than using either of them alone. The accuracies of models based on changes in tumor markers and radiologic evaluation were relatively poorer than of the radiomics model. Moreover, Patients predicted to respond to therapy using the radiomics model showed a relatively longer overall survival (43 months vs 27 months), although there were no significant differences (p=0.063). Conclusions: The tumor core_edge combination delta radiomics model is an effective approach to evaluate pathologic response in PC patients with systemic treatment.","PeriodicalId":92925,"journal":{"name":"Journal of pancreatology","volume":"19 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of pancreatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/jp9.0000000000000148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: As a systemic disease, pancreatic cancer (PC) can be treated systemically to raise the R 0 resection rate and enhance patient prognosis. The best ways to assess the treatment response to systemic treatment of patients with PC are still lacking. Methods: A total of 122 PC patients were enrolled; 25 of these patients were used as an independent testing set. According to the pathologic response, PC patients were classified into the responder and non-responder groups. The whole tumor, core, edge, and peritumoral were segmented from the enhanced CT images. Machine learning models were created by extracting the variations in radionics features before and after therapy (delta radiomics features). Finally, we compared the performance of models based on radiomics features, changes in tumor markers, and radiologic evaluation. Results: The model based on the core (Area under Curve, AUC=0.864) and edge features (AUC=0.853) showed better performance than that based on the whole tumor (AUC=0.847) or peritumoral area (AUC=0.846). Moreover, the tumor core_edge combination model (AUC=0.899) could better increase confidence in treatment response than using either of them alone. The accuracies of models based on changes in tumor markers and radiologic evaluation were relatively poorer than of the radiomics model. Moreover, Patients predicted to respond to therapy using the radiomics model showed a relatively longer overall survival (43 months vs 27 months), although there were no significant differences (p=0.063). Conclusions: The tumor core_edge combination delta radiomics model is an effective approach to evaluate pathologic response in PC patients with systemic treatment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于计算机断层扫描的肿瘤核心边缘组合的δ放射组学用于胰腺癌的全身治疗反应评估
背景:胰腺癌作为一种全身性疾病,可通过系统治疗提高R - 0切除率,改善患者预后。目前仍缺乏评估全身治疗对PC患者治疗效果的最佳方法。方法:共纳入122例PC患者;其中25例患者作为独立测试集。根据病理反应将PC患者分为有反应组和无反应组。从增强CT图像上分割整个肿瘤、核心、边缘和肿瘤周围。通过提取治疗前后放射学特征的变化(δ放射组学特征)创建机器学习模型。最后,我们比较了基于放射组学特征、肿瘤标志物变化和放射学评估的模型的性能。结果:基于核心(曲线下面积,AUC=0.864)和边缘特征(AUC=0.853)的模型优于基于整个肿瘤(AUC=0.847)或肿瘤周围面积(AUC=0.846)的模型。此外,肿瘤core_edge联合模型(AUC=0.899)比单独使用它们中的任何一个都能更好地提高治疗反应的置信度。基于肿瘤标志物变化和放射学评估的模型的准确性相对较差。此外,使用放射组学模型预测对治疗有反应的患者显示出相对较长的总生存期(43个月对27个月),尽管没有显著差异(p=0.063)。结论:肿瘤core_edge联合δ放射组学模型是评估全身治疗PC患者病理反应的有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Reappraisal of the Parenchyma-Sparing Resections for Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Chinese High-volume Center Experience Phase angle is an indicator of GLIM-diagnosed malnutrition in patients undergoing major pancreatic and biliary surgery: a cross-sectional study Consensus on the Clinical Diagnosis and Treatment of Grade 3 Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors Urinastatin combined with octreotide versus sole octreotide in severe acute pancreatitis: a meta-analysis Integrated analysis of single-cell and bulk RNA sequencing to construct a CD8 + T cell-related immune gene signature in pancreatic cancer
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1