Literacy instructional coaching practices in writing and writing instruction: an exploration of K–6 teachers' perspectives

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education Pub Date : 2023-10-30 DOI:10.1108/ijmce-02-2023-0023
Jadelyn Abbott, Katherine Landau Wright, Hannah Carter
{"title":"Literacy instructional coaching practices in writing and writing instruction: an exploration of K–6 teachers' perspectives","authors":"Jadelyn Abbott, Katherine Landau Wright, Hannah Carter","doi":"10.1108/ijmce-02-2023-0023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify if and how K–6 teachers perceive that their literacy instructional coaches influence their writing teaching. Design/methodology/approach The authors employed a parallel convergent mixed-methods design with survey data. The authors used thematic analysis to identify patterns within short-answer responses. Findings K–6 teachers receive little literacy coaching specific to writing. However, when they do receive coaching, they believe it benefits their writing instruction. Sustained coaching through the coaching cycle, frequent collaborations, and support with writing instructional resources and strategies were reported as the most influential writing coaching practices. Research limitations/implications Sample size was a limitation to this study. Of the 66 participants, 41 (62%) completed the entire survey. Practical implications This research provides coaches with valuable insights about coaching practices that teachers find to be the most effective in influencing their writing instruction. The increase in teachers' competence in writing instruction due to coaching provides evidence to administrators and stakeholders that coaching in writing is an area in need of attention. Originality/value This study adds to research specific to the coaching of writing within the K–6 context, which currently is sparse.","PeriodicalId":45297,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ijmce-02-2023-0023","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to identify if and how K–6 teachers perceive that their literacy instructional coaches influence their writing teaching. Design/methodology/approach The authors employed a parallel convergent mixed-methods design with survey data. The authors used thematic analysis to identify patterns within short-answer responses. Findings K–6 teachers receive little literacy coaching specific to writing. However, when they do receive coaching, they believe it benefits their writing instruction. Sustained coaching through the coaching cycle, frequent collaborations, and support with writing instructional resources and strategies were reported as the most influential writing coaching practices. Research limitations/implications Sample size was a limitation to this study. Of the 66 participants, 41 (62%) completed the entire survey. Practical implications This research provides coaches with valuable insights about coaching practices that teachers find to be the most effective in influencing their writing instruction. The increase in teachers' competence in writing instruction due to coaching provides evidence to administrators and stakeholders that coaching in writing is an area in need of attention. Originality/value This study adds to research specific to the coaching of writing within the K–6 context, which currently is sparse.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
写作与写作教学中的识字教学辅导实践:从小学六年级教师的角度探讨
目的本研究的目的是确定K-6教师是否以及如何感知他们的识字教学教练影响他们的写作教学。设计/方法/方法作者采用平行收敛混合方法设计调查数据。作者使用主题分析来识别简短回答中的模式。K-6教师很少接受专门针对写作的读写培训。然而,当他们接受指导时,他们相信这有利于他们的写作指导。据报道,通过指导周期进行持续的指导,频繁的合作,以及写作教学资源和策略的支持是最具影响力的写作指导实践。研究局限性/启示样本量是本研究的局限性。在66名参与者中,41人(62%)完成了整个调查。本研究为教练提供了有价值的指导实践见解,教师发现这些指导实践最有效地影响了他们的写作教学。教师在写作指导能力的提高,由于辅导提供了证据,行政人员和利益相关者,写作辅导是一个需要关注的领域。独创性/价值本研究增加了针对K-6背景下写作指导的研究,目前这方面的研究很少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
33.30%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education (IJMCE) publishes cutting edge research, theoretical accounts and emerging issues of mentoring and coaching in educational contexts, including schools, colleges and universities. IJMCE provides global insights and critical accounts of how mentoring and coaching are evolving on a global platform evidencing their situated nature and generic characteristics. This unique journal highlights what is recognised as effective and less effective practice in specific contexts, as well as demonstrating why this is so and discussing possible transferability to other contexts. Coverage includes, but is not limited to: Pre-service teacher education, New teacher induction and early professional learning, Teachers’ CPD provision, Educational technology provision, Educational leadership, Pre-school education and care, School/FE and HE education, Undergraduate student tuition, Postgraduate student tuition, Educational consultancy services, Children’s support services, Adult learning services.
期刊最新文献
Effective mentoring strategies to support underrepresented students during a virtual summer research experience for engineering education undergraduates Women in academia: mentorship from a gendered perspective The long-term implications of an after-school STEM mentoring program: the perspectives of former STEM undergraduate student mentors The role of teachers’ direct and emotional mentoring in shaping undergraduates’ research aspirations: a social cognitive career theory perspective Am I in charge? An examination of mentor perception of power from the Indian context with a global perspective
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1