Investigation of the Effect of Online (Web-Based) Formative Assessment Applications on Students' Academic Achievement

Bayram ÇETİN, Şeref AKPINAR
{"title":"Investigation of the Effect of Online (Web-Based) Formative Assessment Applications on Students' Academic Achievement","authors":"Bayram ÇETİN, Şeref AKPINAR","doi":"10.21031/epod.1320182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of this research is to determine the secondary education 10. the aim of this study is to examine the effect of the applications of providing resources for learning disabilities by the system and providing feedback for learning disabilities by the teacher within the scope of online (web-based) formative evaluation application of mathematics course of second-degree equations of classroom students on the students' achievements. In the research, it was used using a semi-experimental pattern. Pre-test - post-test success tests and monitoring facilities were used. The research was conducted in the 2022-2023 academic year with a total of 302 students selected from 4 schools and 12 branches in Göksun and Ağrın districts using stratified, random cluster sampling method. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance analysis (ANCOVA). According to the results of the research, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre-test averages of the groups, but a statistically significant difference appeared in the post-test. Dec. The provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the Experiment-2 group and the provision of detailed feedback by the teacher according to the Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (BTM) for learning disabilities, the provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the Experiment-1 group and normal teaching applied to the Control group; the provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the experiment-1 group and normal teaching applied to the control group were also found to be effective. In addition, according to the results of the experimental processing process, Experiment-2 showed a higher level of development between the pre- and Decal test averages than Experiment-1 and Experiment-1 from the Control group.","PeriodicalId":43015,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology-EPOD","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21031/epod.1320182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the secondary education 10. the aim of this study is to examine the effect of the applications of providing resources for learning disabilities by the system and providing feedback for learning disabilities by the teacher within the scope of online (web-based) formative evaluation application of mathematics course of second-degree equations of classroom students on the students' achievements. In the research, it was used using a semi-experimental pattern. Pre-test - post-test success tests and monitoring facilities were used. The research was conducted in the 2022-2023 academic year with a total of 302 students selected from 4 schools and 12 branches in Göksun and Ağrın districts using stratified, random cluster sampling method. The data were analyzed by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and covariance analysis (ANCOVA). According to the results of the research, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the pre-test averages of the groups, but a statistically significant difference appeared in the post-test. Dec. The provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the Experiment-2 group and the provision of detailed feedback by the teacher according to the Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling (BTM) for learning disabilities, the provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the Experiment-1 group and normal teaching applied to the Control group; the provision of resources for learning disabilities by the system applied to the experiment-1 group and normal teaching applied to the control group were also found to be effective. In addition, according to the results of the experimental processing process, Experiment-2 showed a higher level of development between the pre- and Decal test averages than Experiment-1 and Experiment-1 from the Control group.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
网络形成性评价应用对学生学业成绩影响的调查
本研究的目的是确定中等教育的10。本研究旨在探讨系统提供学习障碍资源和教师提供学习障碍反馈在课堂学生二次方程数学课程在线(网络)形成性评价应用范围内对学生成绩的影响。在这项研究中,它采用了半实验模式。使用了测试前-测试后成功测试和监测设施。研究时间为2022-2023学年,采用分层随机整群抽样的方法,从Göksun和Ağrın地区的4所学校和12个分校中抽取302名学生。采用单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和协方差分析(ANCOVA)对资料进行分析。根据研究结果,两组的前测平均值差异无统计学意义,后测平均值差异有统计学意义。12 .实验2组使用系统提供学习障碍资源,教师根据学习障碍认知诊断模型(Cognitive Diagnostic Modeling, BTM)提供详细反馈,实验1组使用系统提供学习障碍资源,对照组使用正常教学;实验1组使用系统提供学习障碍资源,对照组使用正常教学,均取得了良好效果。此外,根据实验加工过程的结果,实验-2在前测验和贴花测验平均值之间的发展水平高于对照组的实验-1和实验-1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
20.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Learning analytics in formative assessment: A systematic literature review Analysis of Peer and Self-Assessments Using the Many-facet Rasch Measurement Model and Student Opinions Ability Estimation with Polytomous Items in Computerized Multistage Tests Investigation of The Measurement Invariance of Affective Characteristics Related to TIMSS 2019 Mathematics Achievement by Gender A Bibliometric Analysis on Power Analysis Studies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1