Jeopardizing liberal democracy: the trouble with demarchy

Abstract

ABSTRACTFriedrich Hayek presents a demarchic conception of democracy as a solution for what he takes to be the inherently corrupt and totalitarian nature of liberal democracy. While still preserving the label ‘liberal representative democracy’, this Hayekian demarchy precludes parliamentary and governmental institutions from providing positive laws and policies on behalf of their constituents where this would require the transfer of the private property of individuals. Such laws and policies would, on this demarchic conception of liberal democracy, undermine individuals’ free usufruct. I argue that demarchy’s detachment from any concern with the well-being of many of its citizens is an illiberal and anti-democratic (sub)version of liberal democracy that increases populism and risks crushing liberal democracy between the pseudo- and anti-liberal support of a totalitarian majoritarian people’s sovereign power and a minoritarian anti-democratic elite. As such, liberal democracy conceived of in Hayekian demarchic terms is itself an oppressive totalitarian political theory incapable of preventing an increase in illiberal and anti-liberal political forces. Moreover, I argue that it is imperative that we acknowledge and appreciate the extent to which demarchy undermines, rather than strengthens, liberal democracy.KEYWORDS: Demarchyilliberalismliberal democracymarketspopulism AcknowledgmentsThe author is grateful for the helpful comments and suggestions of the anonymous reviewers and Britt Harrison.Disclosure statementNo potential conflict of interest was reported by the author(s).Notes1. https://www.blaetter.de/aktuell/dokumente/»wir-werden-wege-finden-die-parlamentarische-mitbestimmung-so-zu-gestalten-dass-si, accessed 27th July.2. See Law No. 31/2012 of 14/08 (Lei n. 31/2012, de 14 de Agosto (pgdlisboa.pt) acceded 29 January 2021.3. The authors report there are no competing interests to declare.Additional informationFundingThis work was supported by the Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia [0].Notes on contributorsRegina QueirozRegina Queiroz is a researcher at IFILNOVA, NOVA University Lisbon, and teaches at Lusófona University. Her interests lie in the justice and rationality of social and political institutions, uniting Rawlsian theories of fairness, Aristotelian theories of phronesis, comparative analysis of liberalism and neoliberalism, and gender and racial discrimination.